Exploring Gender and Career Implicit Associations in Research
School
Ingleside School**We aren't endorsed by this school
Course
PSY 18
Subject
Psychology
Date
Dec 12, 2024
Pages
4
Uploaded by jasminezc
1.Answers to these questions, based on the study spreadsheet on Gorilla1.How many practice trials with the gendered-names stimuli arethere at the very start?162.How many experimental trials are in the “congruent” condition?(Do not include “congruent_practice.”)323.List the items that were used as gendered-names stimuli.JohnPaulMikeKevinSteveJeffBillAmyJoanLisaSarahDianaKateAnnaDonna4.List the items that were used as career stimuli.ExecutiveCareerCorporationSalaryOfficeProfessional
ManagementBusiness5.List the items that were used as family stimuli.WeddingMarriageParentsRelativesFamilyHomeCousinsChildren6.Screenshot of the layout of the decision screen
2.Answer these questions based on your data that you downloaded fromJamovi:1.A density plot, split by condition, of your data2.Some other plot compare the two conditions in your data
3.Your conclusions about your implicit associations, based on thesetwo plotsBased on the density plot above, I conclude that the higher more prominentbell-shaped curve in the incongruent scores suggest a more uniform distribution ofassociations. Meaning that I have a more nonstereotypical association betweengender and career. With the reaction time being mostly between 400 and 600.Whereas the congruent curve demonstrates my reaction time varying more as it ismore spread out, from before 400 and passing 600 at about 700.Based on the box plot, the incongruent box being smaller suggests a morenarrow interquartile range for reaction time when it comes to incongruentassociations. Compared to the box for congruent, which is bigger, showing thatthere is a wider range of reaction time for more stereotypical associationsbetween gender and career. I think it is worth noting that the median for both isabout the same, suggesting similar central tendencies for congruent andincongruent.