VictoriaDerricoCIS211Week2Assignment
.docx
School
Strayer University**We aren't endorsed by this school
Course
CIS 211
Subject
Computer Science
Date
Dec 16, 2024
Pages
7
Uploaded by CoachTitanium10152
Victoria DerricoCIS211 - Intro to AI10/13/2024Part I: Comparing ChatGPT and GeminiPrompt: “Can you provide a brief overview of the capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT?”ChatGPT response:
Google Gemini response: ChatGPTis a large language model developed by OpenAI. It's designed to interact with users in a conversational way, providing information and completing tasks as instructed. Here's a brief overview of its capabilities and limitations:Capabilities:Generating human-quality text:ChatGPT can produce text that is often indistinguishable from human-written content.Answering your questions in an informative way:It can provide summaries of factual topics or create stories.Translating languages:It can translate text from one language to another.Writing different kinds of creative content:It can write poems, code, scripts, musical pieces, email, letters, etc.Providing summaries of lengthy documents:It can condense information into a more digestible format.Limitations:Lack of real-world understanding:While it can process information and respond in a human-like way, it doesn't have a deep understanding of the world.Potential for bias:The data it was trained on may contain biases, which can influence its responses.Inability to access and process real-time information:It relies onthe data it was trained on, which may not be up-to-date.May generate incorrect or misleading information:While it's designed to be informative, it can sometimes provide incorrect or misleading answers.Overall, ChatGPT is a powerful tool that can be used for a variety of tasks. However, it's important to be aware of its limitations and to use it critically.
Comparison of Google Gemini and ChatGPT Responses1. Tone:Google Gemini:The tone is straightforward and informative, maintaining a neutral and slightly formal style. It presents the information clearly and methodically.ChatGPT:The tone is conversational and slightly more casual, which may make it feel more approachable. It uses a friendly structure, including bullet points that enhance readability.2. Amount of Information:Google Gemini:Offers a comprehensive list of capabilities and limitations, covering a broad range of functions, including specific examples of creative tasks.ChatGPT:Provides a detailed overview but emphasizes conversationalskills and personalization, which highlights its interactive nature. However, it could be seen as slightly less exhaustive in listing specific capabilities.3. Accuracy:Google Gemini:The information is accurate and presents a solid understanding of ChatGPT’s functions and limitations, aligning closely with established knowledge.ChatGPT:Also accurate, but the emphasis on personalization and emotional understanding may come off as slightly more subjective. Themention of "real-time knowledge" is framed as a limitation without explicitly mentioning a knowledge cutoff date.4. Focus:Google Gemini:Focuses more on the functionalities and potential uses of ChatGPT, providing a balanced view of both capabilities and limitations.ChatGPT:Focuses on how it engages with users, highlighting conversational skills and emotional elements, which may be more relevant for users interested in interaction quality.Reflection on UsefulnessI found Google Gemini's response slightly more useful due to its comprehensive overview thatincludes specific examples of tasks. The structured layout makes it easy to digest and reference,especially for someone looking for a broad understanding of ChatGPT's capabilities. While
ChatGPT provided valuable insights into its conversational nature, the emphasis on emotionalunderstanding and personalization, while relevant, could be less critical for users primarilyseeking functional information.Part II: Refining a PromptPrompt 1:Explain the concept of artificial intelligence in a way that is easy for a child to understand.Prompt 2:Discuss the ethical implications of artificial intelligence development.ChatGPT Responses:Prompt 1 Response:
Prompt 2 Response:
Comparison:
1.Tone:The first response is more informal and conversational, while thesecond response is more serious and academic.2.Audience:The first response is clearly aimed at a child audience, while the second response is aimed at a more general audience.3.Purpose:The first response is intended to provide a basic understanding of AI, while the second response is intended to explore the potential ethical implications of AI development.4.Format:The first response is shorter and more concise than the second response.By adding specific words like "child" and "ethical implications" to the prompts, I was able to effectively guide ChatGPT's responses towards different audiences and purposes.