Multiple and Maximal Oppositions Intervention- Brook and Roxana
.pdf
School
Stephen F Austin State University**We aren't endorsed by this school
Course
SPH 300
Subject
Chemistry
Date
Dec 16, 2024
Pages
1
Uploaded by Clark_mg
ComparisonInfographicAge range --> 3:0-6:6 Moderate to severephonological disorderMissing at least 6 soundsacross 3 manners Demonstrate extensivephonemic homonym Multiple OppositionsIntervention:Child is confronted with severalsounds simultaneously within aphoneme collapse; this treatmentoccurs in 4 phases: Familiarizationand Initial Production of contrasts,Production of contrasts andinteractive play, Contracts withcommunicative contexts, andConversational recastsUses a pair of phonemesthat differ by severaldistinctive features toteach a child newsounds; Integrates theEmpty Set TargetsInduce multiple phoneme splitsthat have been previouslycollapsed.. in-order to reducethe homonymy in the child’ssystemTo cause the greatestphonological change in achild's sound system Age range --> 3:0-6:6Moderate to severe phonologicaldisorderHas at least 6 sounds missing fromtheir inventory Several sound errors acrossdifferent sound classesClient with cleftsMaximalOppositions Theory:Goal =Goal =Goal =Goal =Goal =Goal =POPULATION:POPULATION:POPULATION:POPULATION:MultipleMultipleoppositionsoppositionsinterventioninterventionVS.Strengths:Strengths:Strengths: Strengths:Strengths:Strengths:Increase generalization of sounds overshort period of timepotential to dynamically restructurephonological systemsWeakness:Weakness:Weakness:Optimal progress will not benoticed if the treatment isn't usedfrequently and intensely Can be confusing to people withbroader languages More generalization than minimaloppositionsValidated researchSounds don't have to be in child'sinventoryLearn different phonemes at faster rateCan use nonsense wordsTechnique is in emerging state inthe U.S.Finding a clinician with the properskill, knowledge, and dedication Weakness:Weakness:Weakness: