Q1. Spinach King
.docx
School
Union High School**We aren't endorsed by this school
Course
BUSINESS 100
Subject
Economics
Date
Dec 19, 2024
Pages
18
Uploaded by PresidentHorse4734
Spinach KingExecutive summaryThe company named Spinach King faced loss from its analysis during October 2023. While placing the marketers on nearby farms they will be required to conform to the present market standards. Improving their market foothold would result in spinning out achievements for them in the long run. It is also clear that the business appears to be going in the other direction from augmenting brand marketing to enhancing franchise business through employee training. In the course of its digital transformation and brand marketing, the company will help itself in the course of moving from one market to another. Both franchising and introducing new products have worked well for Spinach King franchise. It established franchises both domestically and abroad, making money from royalties. During the pandemic, it focused on the necessities and marketing of healthy living. Spinach King took the approach of direct and retail marketing in two ways. Collaboration with the national distribution system enhanced distribution. In the area of protection and growth of the society, the company supported farmers, but more effort is needed to integrate and increase their energy.IntroductionThis report will examine Spinach King on its strengths and weaknesses on external and internal level. It will also recommend some strategies and future moves of the company. In the second part of this report, the authors will analyze the growth and competitive strategies in detail and will also propose measures and strategies that enhance growth in a sustainable and ethical manner.External environment analysisTo grasp the external environment that has influence on the airline industry, a PESTLE analysis (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal and Environmental) is very important. In the present analysis of drivers of the airline industry, the principal drivers of the airline industry will be argued and in this argument, national political and economic developments, as recent in South Africa, will be included.Political Factors:The aviation industry is influenced by political relations especially in areas of
regulations, international relations and national security policies which radius out to affect airline operations.Recent Example:The South African making up in 2024 to 2029 is most likely to change, particularly thegovernance and economic reform policies. As Coetzee (2024) argues, “Politics in South Africa has been shifting due to the impending 2024 elections, and depending on the outcome, some sectors, such as transportation, may now be regulated differently”. He goes on to say that “South Africa is looking for increased stability through improved governance but issues of corruption might be a concern in the provision of services such as airports and air traffic control systems” South Africa’s South African elections will influence the governance of the country and some political decisions concerning the South African elections will also seek to influence the provision of air traffic. Other political decisions, especially concerning international relations like open skies agreements or prohibitions on foreign carriers will influence the generation of a business for South Africa aviation.In the case of the airline industry, these political shifts may result in: The International flight routes and agreements: When the strategy of South African trade agreement implementation and foreign penetration opens doors for South African airlines to enter international markets, it is likely to yield immediate direct effects in the form of the level to which international airlines will be admitted into SouthAfrica and, consequently, what, if any, allows domestic airlines to enter the market abroad and/or to the outcome of some strategic initiation of alliance agreements with airlines outside South Africa.State-owned airlines: Airlines, like South African Airways, are directed by government.Alterations of government aid, subsidies or privatization of the enterprise may have a critical effect on their market position and balance sheet.Economic Factors:Air travel demand and its expenses are heavily dependent on the Economy. This relates to the per capitalincome of consumers, prices of fuel, and other economy-wide influences. Recent ExampleThe impact of Covid-19 pandemic on the economy of the airline industry across the globe including southern Africa has been negative with restrictions on travel and fear of the virus leading to decreases in demand for airline products. The better phase came in 2023 and early 2024 when a significant re-surge in the demand was witnessed especially for leisure travel owing to fewer restrictions in place.
In addition, inflation and the constant fluctuations of global fuel prices greatly influence the overall operational costs of all airlines. According to a report by the African Development Bank (2024), fuel prices are especially difficult for South Africancarriers, and depreciation of the Rand exacerbates this cost burden. Changes in oil prices or currency depreciation will result in higher air transportation costs. It will result in lesser travel demand, especially for domestic markets in South Africa, wherecitizens are not as privileged as in other countries.How Economic Factors Affect the Airline Industry:Fuel Prices: Airlines are directly affected by rising fuel prices. Financial risk to South African airlines is compounded by having to "manage Petro Dollars" - imported oil - and that any rise in oil prices worldwide must be met by fuel price rises, which tend to look unfair to budget passengers.Consumer Confidence and Disposable Income: There may be a rebound effect of the economy in the aftermaths of pandemics, and heightened consumer travel, and heightened purchasing power will follow. However, these inflationary-pushing factors on travel demand, most relevant for long-distance travel routes, where demand is primarily sensitive to price, may also be important. South African air passengers will no doubt be at the edge of their patience trying to work out how to revise their ticket prices in response to supply and demand without the cost flying off the top of their pocket money.Impact on the Airline Industry：Political Influence: As political events and their impact on the global and domestic South African context seem to evolve, as highlighted in Coetzee (2024), there is a possibility that the shifting of ruling parties may foster or restrict air transport development. In fact, the 2024 elections and the new government’s approach towards privatization or subsidies in the airline industry may bring about transfer of airline shares, particularly of South African Airways which is currently under-utilized control by the government. In addition, there is a possibility that political turbulence would affect the foreign direct investment inflows into the airline industry which will aggravate the financial viability of these carriers.Economic Influence: Fuel prices and the South African currency are significant risk factors to airlines in an economic sense. The African Development Bank (2024) pointsout that the weakness of the Rand when compared to the US dollar may result in higher operating costs for airlines, in particular when purchasing fuel or aircraft leases.This has direct consequences for profitability, pricing tactics, and consequently, for consumer request. In addition, inflationary pressures may increase operating
Bargaining Power ofBuyersexpenses e.g., labor, maintenance) which some airlines will have to transfer to the travelling public's, which may indirectly influence demand for domestic and international air travel.Post-Pandemic Recovery: Due to post-pandemic rebound, tourism demand has surged not only for outbound flights but also for domestic air travel. The South African airlines therefore have a lot to look forward to in the shape and form of the global move to environmentally friendly tourism that potentially presents a new market need for Eco-tourism, and indeed, all of the "green" travel options available in the years to come. As consumer awareness of sustainable behaviors grows, airlines with carbon offsetting policy in place, or with a lean operational fleet as a result of fuel management optimization, are left with the benefit of the increased loyalty and brand marketing advantages.Porter 5 Forces analysisIntroduction to Porter’s Five Forces Framework:According to Michael E. Porter in his book Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, there are five competitive forces he termed Porter’s Five Forces framework that characterize any industry. Competition that exists within an industry, the sources of competitive pressure, and how they manifest in the tense competitive atmosphere are effectively evaluated using the framework. The Porter framework focuses on the following five forces that shape competition in an industry:The Threat of New Entrants – Refers to the barriers to entry that could deter other Threat of New EntrantsThreat of SubstitutesBargaining Power ofSuppliersIndustry Rivalry
players from converting and joining an already crowded market.Bargaining Power of Suppliers – The greater the number of suppliers the company has the less bargaining power any single supplier could have. Bargaining Power of Buyers – There is increased competition in an industry in which the buyer’s bargaining power is relatively higher, thus the increased concentration.Threat of Substitute Products or Services – The greater the number of buyers’ substitutes, the greater their power, thus tending to lower the industry's competitive profit potential.Industry Rivalry – This addresses the nature and intensity of competition that exists among the current industry players. The five forces of competition in Porter’s model collectively shape the competitive environment and also the appeal of an industry with respect to earning profits. Spinach King and other such firms can formulate and implement appropriate strategies in order to avert risks, capitalize on opportunities and oppose competition in the market place (Porter, 1980, p. 4).Porter’s Five Forces Analysis for Spinach KingUsing Porter's Five Forces for the analysis of Spinach King case, each of the five forces will be evaluated as to how it is affecting the position of Spinach King in the fresh produce market (as a whole) and also for spinach (as a speciality). Analysis willdemonstrate competitive (stakes) associated with the sustainability of Spinach King in the fresh food industry.1. Threat of New Entrants:The amount of initial investment needed to start to compete within the fresh produceindustry is not that excessive but rather comparative depending on the region, marketcircumstances and excellent distribution system.·Barriers to Entry – Spinach King’s brand is supportive to the distribution chains and farming units, and therefore, these enable them to establish operations. Nevertheless, the new entrants stand a chance of entering the market with less capital if they target a niche focusing on organic spinach farming which is driven by the rising case for organic produce for instance.·Capital Investment – As compared to sectors like the manufacturing industry, the fresh produce market does not, as a rule, require considerable expansion in terms of capital investment. Nonetheless, crafting a well-rooted brand and establishing a distribution network can be costly for new players.
·Economies of Scale – For the smaller edition, more players may find it hard to compete on price as there may be competitive advantages lose to Spinach King in terms of overhead costs more so with Spinach King as the dominant player or firm.Impact on Spinach King – The threat from potential entrants to the industry seem moderate. Although the market is easy enough to penetrate the brand awareness and operational efficiency creates a cushion against this risk.2. Bargaining Power of Suppliers:Supply leverage by suppliers in the fresh produce sector can range significantly in the level and types of competing suppliers who are present in the market. ·Supplier Concentration: However, if the Spinach King depends on a small number ofsuppliers for the most important inputs (e.g., fertilizer, container, labor), the strength may be in the hands of the suppliers. In contrast, if Spinach King is able to acquire itsraw materials from various sources, it may be able to dilute the market power of any single supplier. ·Input Sustainability: Spinach King is highly reliant on agricultural inputs that are difficult to replace. However, these risks can be reduced by the range of the supplier pool, and, perhaps, also by the internalization of the company (vertical integration). ·Sustainability Trends: On the other hand, if Spinach King (SK) purchases from the organic or sustainable suppliers, their bargaining power would even be strengthened,because the supply of such suppliers will be very narrow. Impact on Spinach King: The bargaining power of suppliers is moderate. For instance, when suppliers raise the price of their product (e.g., increasing organic)Spinach King will need to raise its production costs which may lead to lower margins.However, leveraging multiple suppliers could help minimize this risk.3. Bargaining Power of Buyers:In the market for fresh produce, buyers are often in a powerful position owing to the large number of available alternatives. ·Buyer Information: Because of the increasing number of supermarkets, shoppers have become more knowledgeable on available food options, the nutrition aspects and the price. In addition the growing popularity of online shopping also provides more opportunities for buyers to evaluate prices and suppliers.
·Product Differentiation: The building of brand loyalty for Spinach King could be attained by developing high quality product such as fresh spinach or attractive and appealing packages. On the other hand though, if items are considered to be undifferentiated, consumers will be more than likely to switch to lower-priced rivals.·Price Sensitivity: Due to the fact that spinach is comparatively cheap, it is price elastic. When there is a recession, or an upward inflation war, consumers will tend to buy less expensive alternatives.Impact on Spinach King: With regards to bargaining position of the buyers, the poweris more pronounced. The firm needs to adopt a the low pricing strategy, provide high quality products, and offer unmatched loyalty programs in order to maintain their customers having to deal with the vast number of similar offers.4. The Threat of Substitute Products or Services:Spinach in the fresh produce industry has direct (i.e., competitive, leafy greens) and indirect (i.e., competitive, refrigerated or processed/frozen) competition. ·Availability of Substitutes: Leafy greens (e.g., kale, arugula, lettuce) and other leafy vegetables are a direct threat to spinach. Furthermore, on the decrease of fresh spinach requirement, an alternative with greater vegetable unit sales/ready-to-eat salad bowl provision is the opportunity when fresh spinach is not required. ·Price vs. Quality: Off-the-shelf fresh spinach can be provided in a form that has an advantage over frozen or processed product forms, but price-driven dependence at purchase level for on-or-off-the-shelf substitution will create a category-specific bias, or vice versa as the degree of on-or-off--the-shelf approximation will be attained, respectively.Impact on Spinach King: The threat of substitutes is moderate to high. Spinach King will be forced to fight back the importer by putting on the stage the healthiness, freshness, and sustainability of its produce.5. Industry Rivalry:A healthy food market, with high levels of competition among the range of competitors, is the high horse market. · Number of Competitors: Spinach King arguably will face multiple competitors ranging from the big box competition offering spinach packed and branded as premium product to regional competitors and, also, from competitors focusing on organic/alternative markets.
·Growth Rate of the Market: The fresh produce market is growing as a result of the rise in healthy food consumption. Nevertheless, with the market continuously becoming more and more competitive, i.e., in terms of price and distribution. ·Brand Loyalty: Because of brand loyalty and the tenacity of brand loyalty in construction of positive image, Spinach King is able to make up for the competitive disadvantage due to competition. With regard to price competition per se, the loss can occur. Impact on Spinach King: Industry rivalry is high. In order to achieve market share, Spinach king has to develop an entry point in the market by pursuing product differentiation, quality controls, and the development of new distribution lines.Threat of entryExamplesWeak / Moderate / StrongThreat of New EntrantsWhile barrier to entry is not as high, the existence of Spinach King's existing infrastructure and brands can shield it against new entrants.ModerateBargaining Power of BuyersConsumers have plenty of choices and are price-conscious, so there has to be an emphasis on quality, brand preference and pricing tactics.StrongThreat of SubstitutesThere remains a significant risk of exposure through other head lettuces and manufactured goods that may impact the position of the spinach king on the market.ModerateIndustry RivalryFresh produce market, more or less, is always a competitive market, and for Spinach King, differentiation must be built on quality, sustainability and relationships with customers.StrongOverallIn order to keep up its leading position, Spinach King's work should mainly focus on quality differentiation, building customer loyalty, and cost control, while its operation should be expanded along directions including product line formation and market exploration. In addition, the company will also be anticipated to further develop in areas such as packaging, marketing and distribution to respond to market competition and consumer needs.Moderate
Internal Environment The Resource-Based View (RBV) is a theory-based management model that regardsthe internal resources and capabilities of an organization as being, the sources of a competitive advantage. According to the RBV theory, the source of a company's sustainable competitive advantage lies in its ability to hold valuable, and therefore, inimitable, unique and non-sustainable resources (Barney, 1991). Within the framework of the Spinach King, RBV offers a channel for the identification and ranking of historically most potent internal resources (tangible and intangible) with respect to the strategic capability. Even though to process fine details of public data for Spinach King is not available currently, which we set for Conclusions in data processing and which comes with Conclusions in RBV for Conclusions given the experiences in an overview and inferences for Conclusions in the context of aggregate industry and market information. Introduction to Resource-Based View (RBV) In accordance with the Resource-Based View (RBV), the most important factor deciding whether the company is successfully performing and has a competitive advantage is the specific resources and abilities accordingly. The key assumption in RBV is that resources (tangible, human, and all kinds of other resources which are valuable, non-imitable, non-sustainable, including abstract ones), may lead to such a sustainable advantage over competitors in the long run. RBV generalizes these primitives to the physical (e.g., capital, equipment, assets, property) and nonphysical (e.g., brand image, patents, corporate culture) resources (Barney, 1991). If RBV is implemented in the context of spinach King, then it may be worth examiningthe competences of the company and, thus, its limited nature of resources and competences which, surely, are to be taken into account in the strategic plan.ResourcesCompetenciesSpinach King probably has land, storage and processing/packing areas for spinach products. These physical resources play an important role inproduction performance and scaling.PhysicalLand and facility ownership support stable qualityand consistency.Money and capital, as debt capital, equity capital, or retained earnings capital, for purposes of expansion and operations.FinancialAdequate funding enables investment in technology and expansion.Supply chain alliances between HumanGood working relationships guarantee a
suppliers/distributors and retailers are key to its effectiveness.consistent stream of products to market and cost reduction.
Value ChainMainactivities InboundOperationsOutboundlogisticsMarketing/SalesServicesThis includes primary raw material (seed and fertilizer) procurement,and secondary relationship management suppliers. Successful inbound logistics not only saves production cost,but further ensures a continuous supply of input.The process of growing,harvesting,and processing spinach. The ability to maintainthe production of high quality top yield spinach is the heart of Spinach King success.Network of transaction and shipping costs associated with the final product delivered to the end consumer (e.g.,retail store or consumer). The efficiency of logistics determines the time-to-market and costs.Spinach King’s marketing and publicity activitiesin order to produce a positive feedbackon its products. The involves branding, advertising, and sales strategies.It may involve such activities ascustomer care, post-sales support or customer relationship management.Secondaryactivities Infrastructure(managementteam)HumanresourcesTechnologyDevelopmentProcurementThis includes the company’s management, financial, and legal frameworks. Strong governance and financial management help maintain smooth operations.The recruitment, training,and development of employees.Research and development (R&D) of improved agricultural technology, products or production systems.The cycle of procurement of the required inputs (e.g., agriculture inputs, equipment).
Mapping TOWS and proposed strategy:The means for TOWS analysis instrument are strategic tools which employ internal (and external) factors defined in the course of a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) analysis in order to generate 4 strategic solutions. Using this approach, it is also possible to understand the way in which internal factors can exploit external opportunities on the one side and protect oneself from risks and weaknesses on the other. TOWS Matrix for Spinach KingIn order to build a TOWS matrix, we will first break down Spinach King's internal environment (footing and vulnerability) and external environment (opportunity and threat). Strengths1. Strong agricultural expertise in growing spinach. 2. Well-established supply chain relationships.3. Brand reputation for quality spinach products.Weaknesses1. Dependence on a single product (spinach).2. Vulnerability to weather and environmental factors affecting crop yields.3. Limited distribution network in certain regions.Opportunities1.Increasing consumer demand forhealth-conscious, plant-based foods.2. Growing global trend towardsustainable farming and eco-friendlyproducts.Leverage agricultural knowledge to gain access to new health driven markets (e.g., organic spinach).Diversify the product portfolio (e.g., spinach-containing prepare in advance meals) in response to increasing demand.
3.Expanding markets for organicand fresh produce.Threats1. Climate change affecting agricultural production. 2. Intense competition from other vegetable and spinach producers. 3. Price fluctuations in raw materials and market pricing pressures.Operational efficiency is adapted tofluctuations in market price and competition from competing interfaces.Design risk management actions for climate change and supply chain interruptions, involving input sourcing diversification.Proposed Strategy:Based on the TOWS analysis, we will focus on the SO Strategy: Leverage agricultural expertise to expand into new, health-conscious markets.Proposed strategy is to tap into market needs for health functional plant ingredients by growth of the Spinach King product range and market access. Profits from the expertise of specialists in the deep sciences of agriculture will be turned to develop super high quality non-hygroscopic organic spinach and gain a market niche characterized by non-hygroscopic organic ownership. Moreover,Spinach King will focus on the emerging organic and fresh produce customer segment (adding to raw spinach lines green smoothie, i.e. fresh-and-frozen spinach meals,or spinach ready-to-work in bags.For Spinach King to be effectively backed, the following is necessary:1. Product Diversification:·To build an organic and functional spinach based product portfolio aimed at the health-conscious consumer.·Explain how to form collaborations with food and beverage manufactures or retailers in an effort to stock shops with the products.2. Brand Positioning·Claim Spinach King as a leader in the green, healthy, sustainable food industry.·Highlighting in particular the professional background of the company in terms of spinach production and the fact that the company is a firm believer in sustainability, the following is readily transferable to the green consumer.
3. Market Expansion· Expansion into new geographical regions with growing demand for organic or health-related food products.· Reconstituted as growth into foreign countries, while plant-based (but not health) and portioned foods have shown continued expansion (e.g., North America, Europe).4. Innovation :· Make use of the progress in precision farming in agriculture, with a view toward improving its efficiency, quality of the product (continuous) and operational cost.Suggest Change StrategyTo fully implement this optioned strategy, Spinach King is required to submit an innovation change management plan, both in the area of market penetration and operational efficiency. The following procedures are recommended to be given attention by companies to achieve successful change.1. Innovation and R&D Focus:· Spinach King should commit to the research and development (R&D) of innovative spinach-based products, including pre-packed meal kits, frozen, and snacks. Innovation in plant-based product lines is essential in filling the need for plant-based food. · R&D also relates to the development of sustainable farming practices (i.e., water savings and reduction of its carbon footprint in production).2. Organizational Change:· Allocate resources to a recruiting team to hire employees with product development,brand and marketing expertise to support the scalability of the portfolio· Design an agile organizational structure able to respond to the rapidly shifting environment faced by the market and the behavior of customers.
· Create an organizational culture of innovation and sustainability in an order to make employees one with the new strategic direction.3. Technological Integration :· Adopt innovative agricultural technologies to maximize yields and product uniformity.This includes applications, namely precision agriculture methods and smart farming solutions that allow us to more accurately monitor growth behaviors and make yield predictions.·Apply supply chain technology to optimize efficiency and guarantee that the correct products are placed in the correct markets without a great deal of delay.4. Communication and Stakeholder Management :· Describe as clearly as possible the new strategy for internal stakeholders (staff, suppliers and collaborators) to aimed at alignment and support.·Interacting with external stakeholders (customers, investors and environmentalists) for the acquisition of customer and sustainability efforts and product information.5. Market Research and Consumer Insights:·Gain market intelligence on the target customer profile and its requirements. This could include consumer focus groups, questionnaires, and trend analyses of the health foods market proper. ·Utilize knowledge that consumer behavior data can provide in order to customize marketing plans and product design to regional tastes and eating habits.ConclusionThere is opportunity, in leveraging spinach industry knowledge and marketingstrength of Spinach King, to move into new market for health applications byintroducing organic and premium spinach products. The road-map for product lineexpansion and market penetration laid out by the strategy for company'sdiversification and market gain will guarantee that the company is in a position toleverage the innovations taking place in the plant-based food industry while alsomaintaining a competitive edge. For successful implementation of this method, Spinach King must adopt a model ofchange that includes R&D innovation, organizational restructuring, technologyadoption and delivery, and strong interaction with stakeholders. By thesetransformations, both Spinach King can expand its market share, as well as improve
operational efficiency and sustainability allowing long term corporate scale andprofitability.
References List1. Ahmad,B.andAkbar,M.I.U.D.,(2023).Validatingamultidimensional perspective ofrelationship marketing on brandattachment, customer loyalty and purchase intentions: a serial mediationmodel. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 31(3), pp.669-692.2. Alshurideh, M., Alquqa, E., Alzoubi, H., Kurdi, B. and Hamadneh, S.,(2023). The effect of information security on e-supply chain in the UAE logisticsand distribution industry. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(1), pp.145-152.3. Anggraeni, E.W., Handayati, Y. and Novani, S., (2022). Improving Local FoodSystemsthroughtheCoordinationofAgricultureSupplyChainActors. Sustainability, 14(6), p.3281.4. Aydas, O.T., Ross, A.D. and Parker, H., (2020). Exploring country-level logisticsinfrastructure, market potential, trade exports amongst developed and emergingmarkets. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 14(1), pp.1-11. 5. Du, R.Y., Netzer, O., Schweidel, D.A. and Mitra, D., (2021). Capturing marketinginformation to fuel growth. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), pp.163-183.6. Haldorai, K., Kim, W.G., Phetvaroon, K. and Li, J., (2020). Left out of theoffice "tribe": The influence of workplace ostracism on employee workengagement. InternationalJournalofContemporaryHospitalityManagement, 32(8), pp.2717-2735.7. Jaeger, S.R., Vidal, L., Ares, G., Chheang, S.L. and Spinelli, S., (2021).Healthier eating: Covid- 19 disruption as a catalyst for positive change. Food Qualityand Preference, 92, p.104220. 8. Karatepe, T., Ozturen, A., Karatepe, O.M., Uner, M.M. and Kim, T.T., (2022).Managementcommitment to the ecological environment, green workengagement and their effects on hotelemployees' green workoutcomes. InternationalJournalofContemporaryHospitalityManagement, 34(8), pp.3084-3112. 9. Kremsa, V.Š., (2021). Sustainable management of agricultural resources(agricultural crops and animals). In Sustainable resource management (pp. 99-145).Elsevier. 10. Lyulyov, O., Kwilinski, A., Pimonenko, T., Us, Y. and Korobets, O. (2023). The roleof environmental risk management in company profitability within sustainabledevelopment goals. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/.11. Lyulyov, O., Kwilinski, A., Pimonenko, T., Us, Y. and Korobets, O. (2023). The roleof environmental risk management in company profitability within sustainabledevelopment goals. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/.12. Mitelut, A.C., Popa, E.E., Popescu, P.A. and Popa, M.E., (2021). Trends ofinnovation in bread and bakery production. Trends in wheat and bread making,pp.199-226.13. Rucabado-Palomar, T. and Cuéllar-Padilla, M., (2020). Short food supply chains forlocal food: A difficult path. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 35(2), pp.182-191.
14. Sirdey, N. and Lallau, B., (2020). How do producerorganisations enhance farmers' empowerment in the context of fairtrade certification?. Oxford development studies, 48(2), pp.166-180. 15. Z a h o o r, N . , A l ‐ Ta b b a a , O . , K h a n , Z . a n d W o o d , G . ,( 2 0 2 0 ) . C o l l a b o r a t i o n a n di n t e r n a t i o n a l i z a t i o n o f S M E s :I n s i g h t sa n dr e c o m m e n d a t i o n sf r o mas y s t e m a t i creview. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(4), pp.427-456.