Assignment 2 Criminilistics
.docx
School
Kurushetra University**We aren't endorsed by this school
Course
MANAGEMENT 341
Subject
Biology
Date
Dec 20, 2024
Pages
5
Uploaded by BarristerNeutron13677
1Assignment #2Student NameCourse NameProfessor NameUniversity NameOctober 28, 2022
2Assignment #2Challenges in Investigation of EvidenceIn terms of testing and analysis, firearms are fairly simple. Whenever the ammo is too destroyed for a comparability, it presents the toughest barrier for a weapon examination. Whenever that occurs, attention shifts to DNA, monitor proof, gunpowder debris, as well as fingerprinting. Casting presents a significant obstacle to tyre imprinting. The extent of the marking, high inclination, and deleterious 3-dimensional casts wherein the tyre tread tracks seemelevated on the casting—are some casting issues. Any form of impression proof uses two techniques that are highly prevalent. These two techniques are murder scene photos and murder investigation sketching.Hair presents several difficulties. Absence of hair roots will be the one one will rank as the biggest obstacle. Unattainable short of the root DNA. On the contrary hand, various analysis of hair can be performed. When the hair is person, it may be examined to determine which region of the anatomy the hair originated from. It can also be checked for chronic drug usage andanimal versus human testing.Most Challenging Evidence Collection and JustificationThe hardest evidence to get, in my perspective, is firearms. It would be hard as well as time-consuming to find the firearm until it is left around. There will also be no landings as well as grooves when the ammunition is just too broken or deteriorated for examination. Furthermore,the culprit may be capable of picking up shells that are fired from specific kinds of guns.
3Discussion on Impact of Evidences in Setting up Circumstantial, Direct and Demonstrative Evidence in Court CaseFirearm:Among the simplest and still most difficult pieces of proof is the following. It is rare to find direct evidence gathered from guns. Notwithstanding having the very same make, model, as well as caliber, no two firearms have exactly the very same grooves and land. The reference number, grooves and land, muzzle length, serial number as well as ammunition utilizedare among the specific items of proof taken from the gun that are considered to be unique(Houck& Siegel, 2015). These artefacts provide conclusive evidence that the firearm was employed to commit theoffense. A firearm can be utilized as circumstantial evidence if witnesses attest that the offender utilized it throughout the conduct of the offense or that they saw them armed with it at any time.With regards to weapons, concrete proof is a valuable instrument. It enables the defendant to actually display the firearm proof to the court and display photographs of the scene of the crime as well as the damage the firearm inflicted(Houck & Siegel, 2015).Tire ImpressionIn legal proceedings, this proof may be demonstrative, circumstantial, or direct. The tyre print left at a criminal site may be immediately connected to a specific car that is subsequently connected to the offender, based on direct evidence. As no two cars are precisely same and no two vehicles' tyre wear patterns are identical, tyre imprints are a direct indicator of the vehicle. Tire imprints provide far more conclusive circumstantial evidence. There exists a huge variety ofcars that may utilise those very same tyres, despite the possibility that tyres can be suited to
4model, brand, width, size, as well as tread design. The proof is circumstantial when you can connect the tyres to the car however not the offender(Houck & Siegel, 2015).Tire imprints will have to be photographed and molded in order to provide convincing proof. In order to prove that the suspect utilized grandma's vehicle to conduct the offence, the attorney may display the court a cast of the tyres that was connected to a Ford Taurus, explain how well the tyres were connected to the automobile, and afterwards display a photo of grandmother's Ford Taurus along the license (Michael Fitting Karagiozis & Sgaglio, 2005).Hairs as EvidenceExcept if the hair seems to have the root intact as well as the accused has provided a DNA specimen, hair proof is challenging to show as clear proof. Even so, one would need to demonstrate that the hair obtained wasn't a subsequent transmission. Throughout this case, more proof indicating the suspect executed the offense will need to be substantiated. The hair proof will be a very critical element of circumstantial proof in this similar case. No two persons share the exact identical DNA, therefore DNA proof does not mislead. There really isn't a lot that can be proved employing hair strands in regards of demonstrative proof(Michael Fitting Karagiozis & Sgaglio, 2005).
5ReferencesHouck, M. M., & Siegel, J. A. (2015). Fundamentals of forensic science. Elsevier/Academic Press. https://www.elsevier.com/books/fundamentals-of-forensic-science/houck/978-0-12-800037-3Michael Fitting Karagiozis, & Sgaglio, R. (2005). Forensic Investigation Handbook: An Introduction to the Collection, Preservation, Analysis and Presentation of Evidence. United States.