Academic freedom Essays

Academic freedom is the glue that holds the university together, the principle that protects its educational mission. It is the principle that guarantees faculty members the right to speak and write as they please without interference from the university, the state, or the public. It is the principle that gives both students and faculty in the classroom the right to say whatever they believe is pertinent to the subject at hand. It is the principle that affirms there are no limits to what subjects

limit the students from their beliefs as well taking away their right to express their religion. In the articles, “Professor Watchlist Is Share as Threat to Academic Freedom” by Christopher Mele and “I Am a Dangerous Professor”, share the same idea on how some professors or teachers limit the opinion for students, take away the right of their freedom of speech and some cases discriminate.

We live in a world that is continually becoming more and more sensitive to the opinions and controversies going on around us, especially in the setting of a classroom. Which has lead to controversy and rigorous discussion on whether or not students should be given a warning on when said topics could be spoken upon through what is called a “trigger warning”. As well, when a sensitive topic is to be spoken on in class, there is a growing concept of having a “safe space” to retreat to if needed. Some

desires a life in opulence as a prince. Additionally, he hopes for an own home and a wife, all wishes, that come true at the end of the movie. In the US, similar dreams are widely spread, describing a steady part of the American Dream. The aspect of freedom is illustrated in the movie too, since Jasmine is “not free to make (...) own choices“ and feels “trapped“ . By leaving the palace and going places with Aladdin she breaks free from her old obedient character and becomes more confident and develops

4. Elsa- Humanizing the Villain The 2013 animated film Frozen is a counter-narrative about villains as the villain in this tale may not even be evil at all. She has abilities beyond her control and society’s understanding. In Frozen, Elsa is in need of love and understanding to become a protagonist. Elsa’s isolation from heterosexual society makes her cold and unaccepting of companionship as she does not express interest in men. In fact, the idea of love conveyed in the film undermines heteronormativity

3. Academic freedom in teaching means that both faculty members and students can make comparisons and contrasts between subjects taught in a course and any field of human knowledge or period of history. 4. Academic freedom gives both students and faculty the right to express their views — in speech, writing, and through electronic communication, both on and off campus — without fear of sanction, unless the manner of expression substantially impairs the rights of others or, in the case of faculty

speech on academic freedom. If we do not begin to allow the proper learning and teaching techniques, our society will begin to suffer. Academic freedom is in the decline in today’s society and Anne Neal wants to make a difference. Recently speakers have been backing out of their speeches because of student protests. Campuses are giving speakers speech codes with extremely broad rules. The ideas that are allowed for expression in these rules are decreasing because of the fall of academic freedom. Anne

consideration, banning books can limit the different voices and perspectives available to them, Ultimately limiting their ability to engage with complicated issues and develop critical thinking skills. In fact, Banning books restricts intellectual freedom and critical thinking. As one person says, “It is time we stop being so afraid that we feel we have to prevent students from learning how to engage in critical thinking. The lack of

Throughout the history of higher education, the amount of freedom given to professors has remained largely debated. On one side, professors need the freedom to teach the material the care about and believe in, as to enhance the class itself and be a more engaging teacher. Furthermore, they need to have some freedom within their research projects to allow for discoveries and new ideas that may benefit society as a whole, no matter how controversial they once appear. However, problems occur when controversial

intensified until the calm civil disobedience became an escalating riot. Such protests in academic as well as non academic realms have raised the question of how institutions should decide to whom they provide a public stage to without provoking severe objections by its members. To provide fair and constitutionally aligned opportunities

Freedom of speech allows individuals to publicly decipher whatever words they wish to speak. It is a reasonable concept of a coherent argument with combative or comparative in speech for which it can be mistaken for hate speech. The forms of the inabilities between hate and free speech to imagine a new world. The difference between two speeches as a powerful movement towards changing the attitudes about limiting speech for individuals. The characterizing of this controversy is that hate speech regulations

Some liberal students also argue that speech codes do not threaten freedom of speech at all. They can point out that the First Amendment protects free speech but does not protect speech that is considered to be hateful. Many of these students believe that these codes are simply a way to enforce existing laws and do not restrict legitimate forms of expression or debate. Students believe that speech codes promote academic freedom and intellectual diversity. Cancel culture is a way for people to hold

What is free speech? According to, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1949, article 19, saying “everyone has the right of freedom of their own opinion and expression”. Here are my thoughts people should be able to speak on the government policies publicly without being hurt because the first amendment protects them. Still, not everyone is entitled to speak and articulate what they want to say, because it may cause trouble. According to the article “Free Speech on Campus in Constant Crisis”

else but society itself is to blame for the existence of self-censorship, in the text she explains the criticism she received when stating that “non-Indian women can criticize suttee, a historical practice of ritual suicide by Indian widows.” No academic speech code was imposed by her institution making this a prohibited comment to make, yet her classmates fully disagreed with her statement. Perhaps due to their values or other factors proving that this issue is beyond the blame of institutions.

"Scholarship is not an esoteric appendage; it is at the heart of what the profession is all about..." and "to weaken faculty commitment for scholarship is to undermine the undergraduate experience, regardless of the academic setting" (Boyer, 1990). When faced with this paradigm Boyer (1990) and many other researchers that came after him, agreed on one thing, scholarship is a wider term that includes other activities besides what is conventionally seen as pure research (Higgs et al., 2013). Boyer

Jarrell Yves L. Chua CSETHICS Aaron Swartz’s political advocacy was about the freedom of information to the public. He wanted to give the people the free access to academic journals, federal court documents, government issues, etc. He didn’t like the idea of having to pay for information or knowledge that a person should learn or know. I think that his main concern were the marginalized sectors, wherein they don’t have free access to knowledge, news, and other important documents. As a college student

Banning of the African American AP Course: A Threat To Academic Freedom “If Liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” - George Orwell. This quote perfectly describes the recent banning of an African American AP course in Florida. Teaching a course about African American history, and all the hardships African Americans had to go through is something many people don’t want to hear. The course itself was worked on by over 300 teachers and 200 colleges

The secondary roles would include analysing the reasons for grievances and making recommendation for improving the administrative infrastructure and the academic procedures to reduce the frequency of student complaints against the college management. A university ombudsman is immune to the size and political or ideological affiliations of an educational institution. The concept of campus ombudsman is non-political and has been successfully and effectively implemented in the political framework across

country under the federalists and the national republicans. Is it more beneficial to have a big and powerful government, or to live in complete freedom and self control? We see this controversy bleed over into modern times. When new and

JoAnn Campbell, an assistant professor of English at Indiana University, discusses the role intimacy plays in the classroom setting. Her focus on English A as an introductory writing course displays the extremely combative relationship between recently admitted students and dictatorial professors. Campbell pinpoints the source of this struggle as professors’ resistance to, or even fear of intimacy with the students. This fear can be connected to a need for authority, hence the traditional “hierarchical