Banality of evil Essays

The coverage of John Keegan’s, The Second World War and Hannah Arendt’s, A Report On The Banality of Evil, both discuss important topics on the catastrophic event of the Holocaust, that affected the world. The Holocaust was the massacre of primarily the Jewish race, where they suffered through forced deportation from their native land, hard labor in concentration camps, and experienced horrific mass shootings and the gas chamber. This assessment will discuss both Keegan’s and Arendt’s perspectives

For years now psychologists and sociologists have studied how humans think and act. One key interest among both of these is how humans thinking and actions changes in a group setting. . "The banality of evil" used in “The Lottery” is a term used to describe the ways in which seemingly average people commit violent acts while behaving as though these actions are just another mundane, everyday task to accomplish. One example is Doris Lessing’s “Group Minds.” In this article Lessing describes how we

thinking was different which led her to become the face of huge controversy not only in the local community, but among her own people. Arendt’s major focus in her book Eichmann of Jerusalem revolves around a famous concept of hers, the “banality of evil”. The “banality of evil” lies in Hannah Arendt’s belief that Eichmann was not thinking and was merely following the commands of his superior. To put into Arendt’s own words “[h]e merely, to put the matter colloquially, never realized what he was doing” (Dueck

reading, “The Banality of Evil”, “Eichmann in Jerusalem (1963)”, and watching the documentary, “Civilian at war” we gain a better understanding on Hannah Arendt's theories. Through viewing these pieces of information we can learn what Banality means, why Arendt chooses banality to describe mens actions like Eichmann, and how/why her understanding of this complicate our understanding of the Holocaust and the atrocities of WWII after watching “Civilian at war”. So what exactly does banality mean? This

3. Social Realism in Sherman Alexie’s Literary Works If we scrutinize the literary works of Sherman Alexie, we can realize that social realism has been impacted in most of his writings, especially, poems, short stories, and novels. Alexie wants to show a faithful image of social reality of postmodern age through creating characters, plot- construction, and themes. Alexie wants to highlight his subtle attitude towards social issues of his home country. What he wants to share with the people

• Zimbardo, P. Resisting situational influences and celebrating heroism. In The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil, New York: Random House, 2007, pg. 444-488. The popular image of a hero is skewed by media’s overrepresentation of born-leaders, who are valiant, risk physical injury or even death, and are known to save damsels in distress. However, I like how this reading broke this limited perspective of heroism because not all heroes fall under that same category. I strongly

In “The Canterbury Tales” Chaucer illustrates the corruption of the church through the religious characters in both the tales and the prologue and their obsession with money. Illustrating the fact that medieval England, the church had a big impact on the lives of people due to them being able to “read” the bible. In many cases, this was uses to manipulate people into giving their money to church. Throughout the tales, people are shown to stand up to the church and beat them at their own game and

Cinderella is one of the most widely known tales in fairy tale history. It has many versions and adaptions, some of which differ dramatically in plot, events, target audience, and much more. The Grimm brother’s version is meant to be suitable for children, it focuses on the main character Cinderella, and her struggles, and it is narrated through a third person’s point of view. The story follows Cinderella’s life, starting from the day her mother passes away, to the day she marries the prince and

Eric Estrella Professor: Corinne Croce ENG 210 September 28, 2016 Antigone The character from the play that I have chosen is Creon. Creon in the play is the king of Thebes and is Antigone’s uncle. Creon is a powerfully built person who cherishes order and loyalty above anything. Creon is also the man who suffers the burdens of the rule he had enforced over his pride to make the Gods satisfy and to make people see he wasn't someone to be disobey too. Before the deaths of Oedipus and his sons

for one’s actions due to the fact that being a butcher is an occupation and that killing would be commonplace. “A fiend-like queen” is the portrayal of an evil and demon-like individual, in this instance addressed to Lady Macbeth. The portrayal of a ‘fiend-like queen’ seems more accurate when focused on Lady Macbeth, as she introduces the evil and fuels the ambition that leads Macbeth to his downfall. The personalities of the characters are complex and ever changing hence why giving a definite response

Barabus in the jew of malta is an extremely revengeful and ambitious character. The jew of malta appears as a victim in the beginning of the play. At the very beginning, barabus is shown as a unbelievably wealthy man and extremely shrewd and interested just in his own contentment. Barabus’s vicious evilness is more and more present in his behaviour. As the curtains rises, barabus the jew is discovered in his counting house counting the heaps of gold before him and speaking to himself the while.

their judgements. Whether it was homosexuality or not both Oscar Wilde and Dorian Gray lived similar lives. Both enjoyed the pleasures in life but due to society’s intolerance and xenophobia both were outcasted.Despite homosexuality was condemned as evil, it was still widespread. People began to hide their dark desires, and their misdeeds, while presenting a respectable face tot he public. The publication of the novel scandalized Victorian England. Oscar Wlde’s audience reaction clearly demontrate

In Chapter fourteen of “Blood Meridian” by Cormac McCarthy, it ends up being ridiculously crazy how they’ve changed their acts, it’s nothing new or different to them though, as they’ve just made it their regular way. The Judge and Bathcat buy two little puppies from a little boy, they didn’t plan to keep them though. They of course had to take the puppies lives for fun. The Judge threw them into the river for Bathcat to shoot dead as they were afloat. This part of the book really got to me. I can

Whether working with a co-worker, learning with a classmate or hanging out with a friend, the thought of any of them having the potential to be evil does not cross the mind. Everyday people are not typically evil beings, but if people are not evil beings then why do they commit actions like torture, killing and genocide? Could it be that the certain people committing the acts are just monsters deep inside, or could the actions be mere products of circumstance? In his article "The Genocidal Killer

In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, John Proctor is considered an evil or decent man. John Proctor should not be considered evil but should only be looked upon as a nice and conservative man. Proctor is a man who is selfish rather than selfless and not necessarily a bad selfish either. Proctor cares about his own views and does not really care about the lives of others. This does not mean that he hates everyone else or that this makes him a bad person but people have a weird perspective of him because

role each villain contributes is necessary because it gives the hero a purpose to fulfill. Both archetypal figures are necessary to each other, each one contributes a role that cannot be exist without the other figure. The balance between good and evil, light vs dark will seize to exist without these archetypal figures. The archetypal hero appears

Cybil Regret was born to a pair of bandits belonging to the Band of the Coyote, a human man by the name of Paul Regret, and a devil woman by the name of Luna Blazer. Paul was a weak and timid man, but excelled at gathering intel because he was an unnoticeable, unremarkable man with no outstanding features. Because of this, he was good at hiding in plain sight and gathering info near the target without getting a second glance. Paul Regret was remarkable at being unremarkable. He was so unremarkable

When Chaucer wrote The Canterbury Tales, there is no doubt that he had certain morals in mind. The moral lessons or “truths” conveyed in “The Wife of Bath’s Tale and Prologue” and “The Pardoner’s Tale and Prologue” are a prime example of such. Chaucer composed the Canterbury tales to portray the diverse lives and issues of all who are derived from different cross-sections in Medieval society. In “The Wife of Bath’s Tale and Prologue” and “The Pardoner’s Tale and Prologue”, Chaucer utilized satire

In the book The Great Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald portrays and image of love versus infatuation. The relationships between the characters shows the struggle of an emotional connection in a world driven by societal pressures and money. Gatsby’s and Daisy’s relationship with each other is intertwined with each other’s love and lust, and is complicated with their other relationships, such as Daisy’s and Tom’s marriage. Gatsby is the “fool” in love throughout this whole endeavor and his week with Daisy

Louis Stevenson’s Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a novel that illustrates the mysterious experiences of Dr. Jekyll. This novel correctly perceives evil as although wicked and wrong, it’s something that people can’t subdue because of the temptations that it offers. In the beginning of the novel, Mr. Utterson, Dr. Jekyll’s lawyer, witnessed the event of how a small, evil man, trampled a little girl. To his suspense, this sadistic man is Mr. Hyde, the same person Dr. Jekyll wishes to give all his belongings