Illiberal democracy Essays

In the past decades, politicians had believed authoritarian regime would only hinder economic development. However, there are successful cases demonstrated by authoritarian countries that it may not be the case. It raised a heated debate on whether authoritarian regime will help or hinder economic development. Before addressing the question, definition of keyword are needed to be clarified. Authoritarianism refers to “Political systems with limited, not responsible, political pluralism, without elaborate

While liberalism violates liberal democratic foundations, constructivism provides an alternative theoretical framework to understand this phenomenon. Constructivism emphasizes the aspect of identity that shapes social and political actions through normative and material structures (Reus-Smit, p. 188). The significance of normative and material structures illustrates how they shape the behaviour of socio-political actors (individuals and/or states). Furthermore, constructivism argues that political

Conversely, it is important to recognize the other side of Jacksonian Democracy. The other side of Jacksonian Democracy paints a more negative picture. This negative picture too can be linked together with the President Trump’s administration. Taesuh Cha contents, “Jacksonian worldview has been analyzed as an illiberal, populist ideological system that stems from the early modern inter-civilizational conflict between European settlers and Native Americans. This tradition imaginatively constructs

equal citizenship. For instance it would be wrong for Public office holders to speak in a language that supports racial discrimination, or tribalism. There are many critics to democratic persuasion such as Andrew Koppelman who denies that the state has a duty to pursue it (democratic persuasion). He is skeptical about its necessity or its effectiveness. Robin West argues that democratic persuasion does not act strongly enough to protect equality. However it is the view of this paper that when

Summary: In his book “The Future of Freedom”, Zakaria analyzes the concept of democracy from a critical perspective, arguing that while democracy is certainly desirable in view of its numerous advantages and benefits, too much of it may end up harming nations, governments and even individuals. The Democratic Age In the Introduction he points out that democratization has affected a variety of sectors throughout history, thus disrupting pre-existing hierarchies and giving individuals an unprecedented

idea of how their country should be ruled. Someone stated that the rise of these parties in the US and Europe has been good for democracy; however, I strongly disagree with this statement. Before explaining my viewpoint supported by a few examples, I will define what populism is, how it has raised, the actors involved in this movement and finally, how it affects the democracy. According to the definition of the Oxford dictionary populism is “a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people

definitely is more than meets the eye. After all, Singapore was named as an example to an “illiberal democracy” in a regularly cited article in the journal Foreign Affairs. So do the citizens in Singapore really have true democracy? In this essay, I will develop on why Singapore is an illiberal democracy and then discuss on whether a liberal democracy is the way forward for Singapore. Firstly, a liberal democracy is one that embraces liberalism through the fairness of elections between different political

535). Likewise, Netherlands is the most vivid example of Western democracy retreating from multiculturalism. Moreover, the country is now widely regarded as the prototypical example of ‘the failure of multiculturalism’; in the 1980s, the Netherlands adopted the most ambitious set of multiculturalism policies in western

When a government does not reflect the will of the people, it will create an illiberal nation. Therefore, the government should be removed from power as it rejects the principles of liberalism. Illiberalism stands opposed to the classic liberal notions of individual rights protected equally by government and the law, and it is hostile to freedom of conscience and expression. In an illiberal nation, the government denies people the right of free expression and equality before the law, furthermore

constitutional individual rights. -Liberal Democracies (Bollen and Paxton, 2000): Democratic Rules and Political Liberties. Its rules are elected and exercise power in a limited manner. -Liberal Autocracies or dictablandas (O’Donnell and Schmitter, 1986): Alternatively, unelected rulers may exercise power in a limited fashion, which results in liberal autocracies. * Absolute government: No significant constraints to the power of rulers. -Illiberal Democracies or democraduras (Diamond and Schmitter

by which political life changes and a normative view of political life that makes statements about how political communities should behave. By its definition Democratization is a change in political regime within a sovereign state from no democracy to democracy. Many scholars of political science have tried to determine the causes of a successful process of democratization. In fact, while democratization is a process in itself, it is linked inevitably to the development of one country, In terms

Freedom of expression is a norm that encourages the freedom of an individual or community to express opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, restriction, or sanction. The term "freedom of expression” (Wikipedia) is sometimes used synonymously, but includes any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used. Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1949) Article 19 states that everyone has the right to freedom of opinion

The Age of Absolutism is defined as a time period in Europe in which monarchs gained all of the power and wealth over the state for themselves, expanding the idea of single rule. The Enlightenment, on the other hand, is defined as a movement during the 18th century that rejected traditional social, religious, and political ideas, and introduced a desire to construct governments free of tyranny (or single rule). Document 3, a primary source written by King Louis XIV of France in 1660, is describing

Everyone loves having the ability to voice their opinions without restrictions. This right is called Freedom of Speech, taking this away from Americans would be the equivalent to causing WWIII. People often use this right to defend themselves when stating opinions However, how long does it take before Freedom of Speech simply becomes Hate Speech? Written in 1789 the Bill of Rights contains about 27 Amendments, these were soon ratified down into the 10 Amendments we’re familiar with today. Amongst

Overpopulation. It is a word that makes politicians wince, and is often described as the "elephant in the room" in discussions about the future of the planet. It is clear to all of us that the planet is not expanding. There is only so much space on Earth, not to mention only so many resources – food, water, and energy – that can support a human population. So a growing human population must pose some kind of a threat to the well-being of planet Earth, mustn 't it?Currently, we as a population use

Could you imagine if you lived in a community where everyone was equal? Sounds great doesn’t it? Equality isn’t as good as it sounds. In “The Giver” by Lois Lowry everyone in the community was completely the same. They couldn 't see colors and they didn’t have feelings. In “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut the community was forced to be the same. The government put them down to the same level of sight,speech,and intelligence. Samuel Johnson once said “It is better that some should be unhappy rather

In Ancient Rome, the Romans had their own Roman Republic. The Roman republic reasonably met the common good. The way they did this was that they didn’t fully meet the common good in all areas, but in other areas they did. In public service I would give the Ancient Romans an A. One of the greatest achievements in ancient time was the waterway. The sewer system, running water system, and indoor plumbing system reduced the chance of diseases from affecting the population. The roman adequates were an

Chantal Mouffes’s radical democracy. Although it is not always readily accepted that there is a significant connection between Butler and Laclau-Mouffes’s thought we should not ignore the strong subterranean ties between them. Furthermore, I will claim that Butler is a radical democrat and that she develops her conceptualisation of radical democracy in part out of a criticial examination with the work of Laclau and Mouffe’s, particularly Mouffe’s. The radical democracy, which represents a conception

In the article, The Liberal Arts are Dead: Long Live the Liberal Arts The author David M. Whalen gears this argumentative article towards the liberal art supporters, and towards those who oppose against it and believe that liberal arts are not important. This article is argumentative because the author goes back and forth explaining the thoughts about liberal arts from both points of view. The benefits of allowing both perspective and thoughts in the article is to show that there is contrast dealing

Introduction The city-states of Athens and Greece were ruled by a diverse range of governments. Under these were the monarchy, the aristocracy, the tyranny, the oligarchy and the democracy. In this paper we will compare and contrast these 5 forms of governments in ancient Greek city-states. The Monarchy A monarchy is a type of government most recognizable by the fact that power rests in the hands of one person. Usually in the past, monarchies have been ruled by kings, together with his advisors