International law Essays

sound legal justification for the employment of use of force has been a key issue in international law since the days of Grotius and his “Just War” doctrine. Increasing interdependency of states and the authority the United Nations Charter and Security Council results in a complex system of law where the legality of use of force depends as much on defensibility of the act as it does on the rules of international law governing use of force. Moreover, the right of self-defense, along with the principle

International human rights law (HRL) is applicable during times of peace; and International humanitarian law (IHL) is applicable during time of armed conflict, war, and occupation. These two laws are founded to complete each other and both are part of international law which recognizes relations between states. International human rights law and international humanitarian law are applicable in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, but Israel is trying to evade its responsibility in the application

Under international law today sovereignty can be defined as “the legal status of a state that is not subject within its territorial jurisdiction to government, foreign state or foreign law other than public international law”. A state furthermore, has jurisdiction over all individuals within its territory. However, in certain instances it will not exercise this jurisdiction. There is no clear indication of what defined territory is, but a provision was laid down in case law. In the North Sea Continental

Introduction According to Bledsoe and Bozcek in their book, the International Law Dictionary, state jurisdiction is the capacity of a State under International Law to prescribe and enforce the rules of law. It is derived from the State sovereignty and constitutes its vital and central feature. In other words Jurisdiction is the authority state has over individuals, property and actions which happen within its sovereign territorial area (whether it is its land, its national airspace, its internal

International laws are, by definition “A body of rules established by custom or treaty and recognized by nations as binding in their relations with one another” (www.oxforddictionaries.com). International law is a very significant topic because it affects everyone globally. In this research report, I would like to explore the advantages and disadvantages of international laws and consider if they should be enforced in all countries. The modern system we use today was developed in the 17th century

Without the rule of law, impunity reigns. In order that, by punishing violations of international legal norms and by promoting adherence to these norms, the ICC and the Rome Statute system play vital role in advancing the rule of law, thereby reducing impunity. Rome Statute concerns norms aimed at preventing crimes which threaten the peace, security and well-being of the world. The acts and omissions which include under its authority are so heinous, so destructive, that every effort towards their

Law’s application ICJ decides based on the most relevant applicable law which consists of the provision of UN charter that related to the threat of nuclear weapon, the principle and rules of international humanitarian law, law of neutrality, and other relevant treaties on nuclear weapon. UN charter Article 2(4) for generally prohibits the threat and use of force whether it would be directed against territorial or political independence of states, it is known as unlawful aggression; the complementary

201311475 International Law Ms. Pauline Brillantes AB Political Science TTH: 3:30-5:00 Prelim Thesis Statement: International Law has been the key for the states to maintain peace and order. This has been also used as an essential aspect of international relations. However, the aggressive war between different states and nations has an effect on the imposition of international law. The United Nation has a role in addressing issues on international law about global, economic and social

TRUE SENSE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: The controversy whether international law is a law or not resolves on the divergent definitions of the word “law” given by the jurist. If we subscribe to the view of Hobbes, Austin and Pufendorf, that law is a command of sovereign enforced by a superior political authority then international law cannot be included in the category of law. On the other hand if, we subscribe to the view that the term“law”cannot be limited to rules enacted by superior political authority

The current international scenario is dynamic in nature, full of interstate interactions and full of subjects (if you can call them subjects under traditional international law) that are not states. After the Peace of Westphalia —and even prior to that— the “sovereignty” of states has been the driving force of most international relations; consequently, the states were considered to be the only subjects of intentional law disregarding individuals as subjects of international law. Another major issue

seen various international laws emerging in the international world of politics. Originally, International Laws are shaped by group of kingdoms or states through treaties which commonly contains temporary ceasefires and to not so less extent trade conducts. In this day and age though, international laws are instigated from several International Institutions (i.e.: United Nations) which addresses issues ranging from territorial borders to human rights violations. Numerous international laws in the modern

Criminal law prohibits and punishes the behaviors judged to be antisocial. Because each country’s laws are a mirror image of its values, there are often large differences among the national laws of different countries. Both with regard to the nature of the crimes themselves and the penalties considered suitable. The term ‘international criminal law’ refers variously to at least 3 different areas such as cooperation between diverse national legal systems through extradition and other types of mutual

attempts to litigate such a claim in court, the court is very likely to dismiss the case and compel arbitration of the dispute (Mallor, 2012). The Federal Law on International Commercial Arbitration, 1993 (Russian Arbitration Act) governs international commercial arbitration throughout the entire territory of Russia. It was introduced to make international commercial

Hull posits at the end of her book, A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law During the Great War, that Germany did not “speak the same legal language” as Great Britain and France. In order to understand Germany’s legal language, Hull attempts to re-center international law as a fundamental element in the structuring of the belligerents’ legal principles that later influenced internalized mores and external conduct. Hull, a historian of modern Germany, pays special attention to the

significant impact post World War 2; shaping the modern world. It had an enormous personal impact on victims and an international impact on the law, A range of evidence powerfully constructs the disastrous effect it had. The assessment of the Holocaust's impact was enormously influential to the modern world. The Holocaust gave rise to the recognition of the genocide and greatly impacted international law’s association with it. Lemkin argues that the introduction of the word “genocide” will demonstrate the

The Journal, “Feminists of International Law and Their Critics”, by Hilary Charlesworth seeks to address the relationship of women and international human rights law. This journal also tell about feminist critiques of International law. This Journal consists of four parts which are the first part is about Feminist Criticism of International law that in this part according to feminist analysis of International law has divided in to two major roles which are deconstructive and reconstructive. Second

be protected by international law and the transgression becomes a matter for the international community. For example, when Milosevic attempted to drive Kosovan Albanians out of the province in the late 1990s, NATO launched air strikes (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, 1999). Also, the introduction of the ‘Responsibility

favor of independence from Indonesia was trailed by major civil unrest marked by across the board savagery by the Indonesian armed force and militia groups against civilians, mounting global pressure to intervene brought about an Australian-headed International Force for East Timor (INTERFET) with approval

effectiveness of humanitarian intervention has been the subject of international discussion. (Thakur 2006). In this case study I will assessing the effectiveness humanitarian intervention during the 1994 Rwandan Genocide. From April to June, Hutu extremists killed 800, 000 to one million Tutsi civilians and Hutu moderates. I will do this by examining the humanitarian intervention provided by the United States and Belgian forces, the International Committee of the Red Cross and

To make a valid agreement for whether to be in favor of or against human rights prosecutions and humanitarian intervention one must look at both sides. However, that will not be enough. Every country is different; ideologies, norms, culture language and the list can go on forever. It is important to look at these factors as well when one looks at these cases. The United States of Americas decision to bomb Libya in 2011, was a decision that has been justified to save lives. Before and during the