The paper compares and contrasts the differences involving critical thinking, reasoned dialogue, and dialectic reasoning. All the above mentioned processes aim at solving particular relevant issues in the society. When incorporated in the people’s activities and lifestyles, they are able to change one’s way of reasoning and their attitude toward particular issues in society. Despite their differences, critical thinking, reasoned dialogue, and dialectic reasoning are all important aspects in personal
Introduction There is never a single viewpoint to an issue. Different people can contribute different points of view based on different experiences, ideologies, and upbringings. In western countries such as Canada, this is a defining feature of our culture. Canada’s accepting outlook on immigration has resulted in a mixing of worldviews amongst its people. As such, cultural diversity in the media has also become key for preserving and maintaining democracy through participation. When newspapers fail
Introduction Views of ethnicity and ethnic boundaries in the sociological literature can be broadly divided into two categories. On the one hand, scholars like Weber ([1922] 1968) focus on the essential characteristics of ethnicity and a set of subjective “beliefs,” collective understandings of a common ancestry and shared culture (385, 389). On the other hand, another category of ethnic boundaries derive from the work of social anthropologists such as Fredrik Barth (1969) who theorizes that
Efforts to make Quebecers feel more at home in Canada through bilingualism and biculturalism: When Francophones began to vocalize their frustration with their situation in Canada, the government of Canada made efforts for Quebecers to feel more comfortable through bilingualism and biculturalism. In 1963, the government hired the Royal Commission on Bilingualism and Biculturalism to examine the situation and make recommendations on how to improve it. In order to address the problem, The Official
Canada prides itself at home and abroad as a country made up of a cultural mosaic rather than a cultural melting pot. The mosaic is based on our belief that Canada as a whole becomes stronger by having immigrants bring with them their cultural diversity for all Canadians to learn from. The cultural melting pot, as adopted in the United States, tells immigrants that no matter who they have been in the past, upon landing on American shores, they are Americans and are expected to adopt and follow the