The “Misogyny” speech by Julia Gillard, the prime minister during the time, was performed in the house of representatives on 9th of October 2012. Clear usage of her role as prime minister, her gender and word choice are shown as effective shaming of the leader of the opposition, Tony Abbot. The speech was given because of Abbots sexist and Misogynistic statements. Because of Abbots position in parliament as opposition leader, he should be targeted to maintain power in the government and giving the elected labor party a good public image in the regards to sexism and Misogyny. In doing so she was able to defend her standpoint as a female minister of Parliament. To convey Gillard 's intention throughout the speech she uses many clear language and literary features that become very effective when being read or performed to an audience without the ability to read along with the speech. This can be seen with the repetition of “I am offended.” This simple …show more content…
By addressing Tony Abbott as the “leader of the opposition” in her speech she takes away his personal identity and leaves him just with a superficial political title. This act shows her dominance, power and hierarchy in parliament. The Degradation of Tony Abbott is the first light attack for his unacceptable statements against women. As Gillard is the first non-male prime minister of Australia she sets the Standard with her own register of language. With this female register Gillard promotes more power as the content originates from a female minister of Parliament. If the “misogyny” speech was given by a male representative it would not have maximum effect as the same speech given by a female. This is because the speeches subject is personalised to the speech 's author, in this case Julia Gillard. Because of this Gillard 's, gender in the speech cannot be labelled as hypocritical towards female
Because of sexist opinions of the time, many people believed that a woman had no power to create change, especially in government since she could not vote. Women themselves believed this societal expectation, and although Grimke does not reject society’s idea of femininity and womanhood entirely, she specifically rejects their supposed political incompetence in a rebuttal. Using evidence from general and specific political movements in England, all of which were greatly aided by the support of women petitioning the government, Grimke assured her audience that “When the women of these States send up to Congress such a petition our legislators will arise, as did those of England, and say: ‘When all the maids and matrons of the land are knocking at our doors we must legislate.’” (Grimke, 192) This summary of her somewhat vague past points is similarly nonspecific; however, this is still effective since simply alluding to historical events rather than explaining them was sufficient for an audience that knew more about England and its history than contemporary Americans do today.
The need to make a change becomes apparent and this speech will push them over the top to do everything in their power to vote. Women want the power to vote away laws that men simply
She identifies that Gillard’s speech was a detour from the safer and more common female politician’s tactic of ‘cop it and move on’. Until the time of her speech, Gillard had always typically ‘risen above it’, just kept moving forward and doing what needed to be done, without specifying an explanatory notion of her life and choices, which
Therefore creating this bias on how she talks about feminist issues. When looking into if Walker was able to persuade the reader it is clear that with the evidence she gives along with her arguments made she was able to get the reader thinking about this issue. After reading the article in full a reader could be persuaded to take her side on this issue because of how well she bring in evidence from other scholars and how she has strategically put her arguments along side Saul’s articles in order to persuade the reader into thinking about what she has said. Walker ultimately has brought up an argument about an issue that makes one think about how gender is important within Canada. Overall, with Walkers writing and a bias that is present because of her passion for gender and
This humanities passage is from a speech by Susan B. Anthony, a 19th-century women’s rights leader. Susan B. Anthony, the leader in the women’s rights movement, has voted at the last Presidential election, and was branded as a criminal who refuses to follow the U.S. Law. However, in this speech, she asserts that she has not committed crime, but only is simply aware of her and all United States citizens’ rights. Anthony, as one of the suffragettes, justifies her decision of voting and clarifies her firm favor of women’s suffrage. In this passage, she uses various types of argument in order to convince the audience via three strategies: appeals to authorities, stylistic choices, rhetorical question, and appeal to emotions.
2016 Sophie Grégoire – Trudeau Has the Reason to Be Supported Recently, Sophie Grégoire – Trudeau, the wife of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, made few comments which created a heated issue in Canada. As it is been widely reported, in her interview with French-language newspaper, Le Soleil, Grégoire- Trudeau said “I would like to be everywhere, but I cannot.
She states that men and women are equal and should have the same rights and should not be treated differently than each other. This quote by Anna from the speech backs this point up, “Now I want to make this proposition, and I believe every man will accept it. Of course, he will if he is intelligent. Whenever a Republic prescribes the qualifications as applying equally to all the citizens of the Republic, when the Republic says in order to vote, a citizen must be twenty-one years of age, it applies to all alike, there is no discrimination against any race or sex”. (Shaw,4)
This obviously shows she is on the side of women's rights in her argument and again, quoting the Declaration of Independence, gives her the quality of formality using lines from a piece that dear to American
In his exclusive essay for Glamour, titled “President Obama Says, “This Is What a Feminist Looks Like”, former president Barack Obama shares his views as a feminist, as well as how it has impacted his life as a son, husband, father, and president. He states how growing up with a single mother, supporting his wife, and raising two daughters has inspired and formed his views as a feminist. Throughout his life, he has seen the progress of women’s role in society enhance over time and he claims that right now is an “extraordinary time to be a woman”. Though there is still room for improvement on women 's rights, our country has made great progress in the act of women’s rights, according to Obama. During his presidency, he admits that he was working on creating policies to further the equality of women and their rights.
It was an enormous social change for women to take part in public decision making, and gave them a voice to abolish unjust laws. The suffragettes in Australia argued that they were intelligent enough to vote, that it was unfair for them to be taxed without representation, and that they were equal to men therefore should have equal rights. In contrary, the suffragettes’ opponents alleged that women already had indirect power through manipulating their husbands and father’s voting choices at the ballot box, that women were equal but different and that women could not fulfil the duties of citizenship therefore should not vote. The suffragettes encouraged people to sign their petition, as well as held meeting and debates in order to gain supporters. Women in Australia used civil methods of protest, and didn’t adapt the more radical methods used by suffragettes in other countries.
Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun presents the rise of feminism in America in the 1960s. Beneatha Younger, Lena Younger (Mama) and Ruth Younger are the three primary characters displaying evidences of feminism in the play. Moreover, Hansberry creates male characters who demonstrate oppressive attitudes towards women yet enhance the feministic ideology in the play. A Raisin in the Sun is feminist because, with the feminist notions displayed in the play, women can fulfil their individual dreams that are not in sync with traditional conventions of that time.
The art world is perpetually sexist and racists, and curators are key to changing the masses view on art history and contemporary art voices through representation and inclusion. In order to offer up a more just and fair representation of global artistic production, mainstream (non-activist) curators need to re-envision/re-write their definitions of "greatness" to include non-whites, non-westerners, the under-privileged, and women. In Maura Reilly's essay, Taking the Measure of Sexism: Facts, Figures, and Fixes, Reilly fixates on the differences between men and women in the art world and how little has changed in the art world for women, despite decades of feminist activists. Better does not mean equal.
By this deed, Margaret shows her courage and her cleverness and she argues that “some norms must be broken in pursuit of something more important once more” (Strnadova, 2017:18). After the strike, Nicholas Higgins is out of the work, it is Margaret who convinced him to speak to Mr. Thornton and after many tries finally they shake hands and Higgins returns to work, this is a proof of Margaret’s untraditional participation in men’s affairs (Algotsson, 2014:11). Elliot (1994) argues that “Margaret serves as an exemplary mediator by translating the language of men to each other” (41). Thus, Margaret brings the two classes into contact and she conciliates between them.
Introduction Hook: Since the beginning of time, the existence of women and men has been undeniably considered as one of the integral factors that forms our society as it is today. Despite their parallel existence and contribution to the growth of the society, it was considered that women were not treated equal to men both in domestic and working circumstances, leading to a wave of movements demanding equal rights for women, known as feminism. Despite its success in claiming benefits for mistreated women in the past, recent feminism actions and point of views have gone above their original purpose, and created negative impacts and false mindset as its consequences, 2. Credibility I have done some in-depth research about this matter to prepare for the speech, and I myself do not stand for contemporary feminist. 3.
Political correctness requires us to translate marxism from economic language, into cultural language. The main premise forming the essence of political correctness is that through the elites ability to dictate our language, comes their control over the way we act, therein socially engineering society for their own purpose. Political correctness can be described as the barring of expressive and activistic forms confirmed by “correct thinkers” to be exclusionary, insulting or marginalising in respect to minority groups who are discriminated against or socially disadvantaged. The intended corruption of news media, congress, universities, pop culture, politics and our industrial society can be credited to the conscious, manipulating force known