What would you do if you were suddenly accused of murder? Not a happy thought right, but this is what a teenage boy by the name of Adnan Syed had to go through. This young man at the ripe age of seventeen got convicted of murder of his ex-girlfriend. I strongly believe that Adnan Syed is innocent and did not kill Hae Min Lee. There was a lot in this case that did not make sense or did not have enough evidence to have rightfully convicted this man. There was the time frame that was almost impossibly too small or the key witnesses testimony full of holes and lies. Adnan’s alibi and Christina Gutierrez’s bad defense. The biggest advocate for Adnan’s innocence it the Innocence clinic. Although this case was in 1999 there is still evidence out there …show more content…
Jay Wilds was just an informal friend of Adnan, but has said that he was the one who assisted in this unlawful act. According to the recordings of Jay’s testimony, “The cops interview him at least four times that I know about. Two of those are on tape. And Jay also tells this story at trial – not once, but twice cause the first proceeding ended in a mistrial. So, at least, say, six times he's told what happened. And each time, some details shift.” (Inconsistencies). In Jay's testimony there was a numerous amount of details that shifted, therefore elucidating the impression that either Jay was lying to protect himself or someone close to him. In addition to this, it is a perplexing thought as to why Jay would be involved in this crime because him and Adnan were not close friends but rather mere acquaintances who occasionally smoked together. It is suspicious that Jay would alter so many details so that it would parallel the states timeline. Koenig maintains, “In the first taped statement, Jay says he refused to help dig a grave for Hae. Two weeks later, he says they both dug the hole.But then, there are other changes – bigger changes – where it’s harder to judge why the details shift. This one, for instance: In the first taped interview, Jay says Adnan only told him that same day that he was going to kill Hae. Two weeks later, Jay says that Adnan had started talking about it beforehand – four or five days before.” Jay changed his statement to later state that he was an accessory to the crime. He may have done this so that it would be easier to convict Adnan and he would get off scot-free. The change in stories could have been beneficial to Jay and they were definitely beneficial to detectives on the case. Furthermore, Jay’s lies were something that no one besides himself could prove unless they were corroborated like an alibi would have to
The interview with The Intercept was meant for Jay to come out and explain what he witnessed at the time of the murder. Jay agreed to the interview to clear his name since the exposure from the Serial podcast has brought unwanted publicity to both Jay and his family. In this interview Jay talked about some very important topics in this interview and some of these topics actually work in Adnan’s favor even though it was not intended to be that way. Throughout the case Jay has been known to have a various amount of inconsistencies in his testimony. For example, In one interview with police he tells them Adnan showed him Hae's body on Edmonson Avenue and in another interview with police he tells them it was at a Best Buy.
Out of all of the witnesses and all of the facts, the only hard evidence the prosecution had was Jay Wilds’ testimony and Adnan’s own cell phone records. Without the records, the jury must simply decide who is more credible- Jay or Asia. In fact, in a 2015 interview with The Intercept, prosecutor Kevin Urick admits that either Jay’s testimony or the cell phone evidence by itself would not be enough to prove Adnan’s guilt. Therefore, the state needs both of them to put Adnan away. But honestly, the state has neither comfortably.
There is a severe lack of physical evidence in this case (reliable and unreliable). In the Serial podcast, Koeing states that; “The most incriminating piece of physical evidence against Adnan Syed was…a palm print. On a map… police found it in the backseat
She never contacted Asia Mcclain, Adnan’s alibi, nor attempted to disprove the reliability of cell phone records. Christina was aware that Asia had written letters to Adnan stating that she was his alibi, and that she was willing to testify, (Koenig). However, Christina never even attempted to contact her. This is frankly insane, not contacting a willing alibi to testify or to even commute with. This is an enormous red flag.
They both went to the same high school and the only interaction between the two involved smoking marijuana (weed). Jay Wilds is involved in the case because he claimed Adnan called him and asked him to help bury the body (Inconsistencies). Jay stated that he received a phone call from the phone booth in the Best Buy parking lot. After a lengthy amount of research, the conclusion was made that there was never a phone booth in the area. The timeline and location for the actual murder was questioned and the lies began to build up for Jay Wilds.
In Baltimore 1999 on January 13, a girl named Hae Min Lee, a senior at Woodlawn High School, disappeared. Her body was found on February 9 near a park in Baltimore. Her ex- boyfriend Adnan Syed, a 17 year old senior was convicted of killing her and till this day he sits in a cell waiting for his innocence to be proven. Adnan’s star witness Jay, his former classmate who testified that he helped Adnan dispose of Hae’s body. The question everyone's asking is, is Adnan Syed really not guilty
no he didn't, there is so much more evidence that Adnan did not receive a fair trial than that he did, he are some of the key ones. The jury really listens to jay's story and what if he was lying, he really didn't have that much proof that he was telling the truth. Also, ‘’On Jan. 13, 1999, according to Asia, she was in the Woodlawn Public Library while waiting for her boyfriend to pick her up. Shortly after 2:15 p.m., Syed walked in
But if look at Jay's testimony he doesn’t have an alibi for that time frame. Many argue that it couldn’t possibly have been Jay because he didn’t have any motive to kill Hae, but I can argue he did because after Adnan's and Hae’s breakup Adnan was depressed and probably talked a lot about his feelings to Jay. This could even explain the conversation Jay mentions in his testimony where Adnan, under the influence of marijuana and on emotions, says, “I’m going to kill her [Hae].” But Jay was also under the influence of marijuana and after hearing lots of complaining from Adnan about Hae and the breakup, Jay could have decided to go talk to Hae about it. But the conversation soon turned into a argument, then with some harsh decision making while under the influence, Jay ended up killing
Jay started to get paranoid about the situation, Made up a story with Jenn about what happened, and called the police. Except Jay’s story is wishy-washy because it isn’t real, everybody was always saying how much of a liar Jay was, and Jen’s story doesn’t match up at parts because Jay doesn’t have it together. The only way for him to be sure that Adnan was the one to blame, is to make up a story about how Adnan was angry at Hae. But how does Jay know all this information? Jay has to put himself in the story also, put himself in the position where he can’t get in too much trouble, but in a position where he knows everything.
If our judicial system still believes that someone is innocent until proven guilty, then Adnan has to be innocent, because they did not prove him
When the cops first bring Jay in on February 28th, they talked to him for about an hour before the tape went on. Then, on March 15th, the second interview. Jay signs his initials to an official explanation of rights form at 3:15 p.m. Then the tape starts.” She brings evidence to discredit Jay and the detectives in the case.
However, the beginning ends with detectives interviewing Jay, an acquaintance of Adnan, who claims that Adnan repeatedly spoke about murdering Hae, and called him when he had supposedly
According to Serial, the State argues that Adnan called Jay to pick him up at Best Buy, showed him Hae’s body, and told him to help bury the body. Jay’s testimony plays a crucial part in Adnan’s trial, essentially being the aspect of the case that determined the decision for Adnan’s sentence. Without Jay testifying, the prosecution’s case would not have been able to stand, resulting in an entirely different outcome. Reexamining Jay’s timeline, there are many discrepancies in the stories he tells in trial and in the investigation room that reduces the credibility of his case. For one, the “come-and-get-me” was the most peculiar conversation in the second interview.
Jay was scared that the truth would get him in trouble, so he lied. Secondly, Jay’s testimony had faults and changed every time it was told. For example, the number of days before Adnan told him he was going to kill Hae changed every time. In jay’s first interview he said Adnan told him the same day, in the second interview he was told four to five days in advance. Another example is the location where Adnan killed Hae.
She states “A year after Adnan was arrested and the case came to trial, Jay walked up to the witness stand. There’s a moment when Adnan muttered something to him” (45). By Adnan calling Jay pathetic he showed that he couldn’t believe Jay would rat him out. This incident shows that Adnan is a liar and is mad at Jay for going to the police, showing that he is guilty. Even after controlling himself through the whole case he snapped when he saw the man that betrayed him.