You are sitting in your room after winning the District Championship, you remember the joy and cheer when you first laid eyes on that trophy. You look up and there it is, sitting in your room. You suddenly realize that some schools can experience that, why do schools want to take an amazing thing like winning a trophy against all odds away? Schools have been talking about taking away sports for a long time. It is scary to think that schools have done that to kids. That is what America has been doing for ages, and schools want to take that away from us? There are so many goods and bads associated with sports and schools, But it is no fair that schools are stealing what we love the most. Schools should keep sports. One reason schools shouldn't take away sports is that it keeps kids sharp, keen, and more skilled. According to a 2013 report from the Institute of Medicine, physically active …show more content…
Kids love sports, if kids like sports and sports are in school, they will want to stay in school. This means that barely any kids will drop out of school. Also, kids will live happy if they know that they will be playing sports for free. What if some kids want to play sports but they can't? They won't be able to play and may drop out, it is not fair to the student. This means that schools will lose kids instead of gaining them.
A little thing like someone disagreeing with sports or a little problem with your budget shouldn’t change the Nation's pastime. Schools are making a big mistake if they take away sports, this will harm students.Sports help kids get more focused, and can help them in school.Kids won’t be brighter and smarter from sports. Sports help kids with school more than you think, it is also fun for kids. Why do schools want to take something away from us that we love and can help us with school? A little budget cut won’t hurt. But it will hurt
Amanda Ripley, the author of “The Case Against High-School Sports”, made many good points that can create much controversy when it comes to high-school sports, due to the cost and the academic problems it may be creating amongst the students. She interviewed many people who have experiences banning high-school in order to save money for their school district and the school itself. Ripley wants to bring into attention all the money that is used on high-school sports when districts tend to use a minimal amount on academics. I have come to an agreement with her point-of-views due to several reasons: sports are the main focus of any high-school that may have sports, the tax money being provided to the school district has been used on sports than
Auerbach, a journalist, dug through and found “the state and federal funding has dwindled while cost have skyrocketed. That it “hits families hard and kids that wanna play sports can’t. School fees may very well violate the civil rights of student that can't afford to pay them. ”kids are suppose to have the opportunity to play sports whenever they feel they want to do it without happening to worry about the fees that come with it. When its suppose to be free.
Dear Parents of Amery Middle School Students: The problem is with sports is that some people think that sports are bad for children because they get to The physical and others think that sports are a better choice than to do nothing and learn sportsmanship. If one had to choose on side for the competitive sports, it would be children should play competitive sports because sports help children make positive decisions and to help them with their health. The first reason why children should play competitive sports is that it helps them will their positive decision.
In this community lately, there has been discussion lately on sports possibly being removed from the high schools. Although, they get the most recognition that does not mean that just because one little thing it gets removed and completely forgotten about. In fact, so many people do high school sports in the text “Are High School Sports Good For Kids” it explicitly states “Here in Michigan almost 300,000 young people take part in high school sports every year.” This scene particularly shows that many youth athletes participate in high school sports in only one state alone.
Courtney Stawarz says, “Sports are important, I understand that. However, Elizabeth Kolbert has a valid argument.” She says, while Americans tend to put more emphasis on sports rather than learning, it is not the children that are at fault. She sees how sports are related to grades being you have to make sure you are eligible to play. Children have to watch their grades in order to be able to play sports in schools.
Have sports teams brought down America’s schools? Would grades skyrocket if sports were removed from schools? Or would they plummet to the ground? According to the article, “Have Sports Teams Brought Down America’s Schools” by Elizabeth Kolbert we’d be better off leaving sports separate from our schools. Millions of students across the U.S. are involved in some type of sport through their school.
For years schools have bonded through sports programs, now they think they should get rid of them. Being a student in school is harder that it has ever been. The academic standards are so high, it can feel paralyzing. That's why it is so important for schools to invest in sports programs now and in the future. Schools should keep sports programs because sports relieve stress on kids and makes kids look forward to going to school.
High School Sports Should be Funded Every year 300,000 students are participating in sports (Gould 1). The School District has been funding the athletics program, which has been benefiting many of the students’ lives for several years. The discontinuation of high school sports will cause many students to loose the health, social and educational benefits provided by participating in athletics. The School District should continue to fund sports because they benefit students.
Is it time to get rid of the American tradition of school sports? In the article, “Yes, It’s Time to Scale Back” the author Amanda Ripley expresses how sports are harmful to the students and school funds. However, in the article, “No Sports Are More Important than Ever” by Tim O’ Shei discusses how school sports benefit students. The article, “10 Reasons Why High School Sports Benefit Students” by Grace Chen also backs up why school sports are important. School sports are a reason for failing grades; on the other hand, there are many positive benefits to having them in schools.
Amanda Ripley argues in her article, The Case Against High-School Sports, that American high-schools should concentrate less on sports and more on education. One of the main points of the article compares the academic success of American high-schools to that of high-schools in other countries. The other main point of the article compares the academic success of American high-schools affiliated with sports to those that are not. The results of the two studies are both shocking and expected at the same time. America is one of the most affluent and demographically developed countries in the world.
Obviously, when students don 't have after school sports they become less stressed and have more time to study for tests which overall increases their grades. Therefore, schools need to cut sports to make sure that all of their students succeed so they 're prepared for the rough future that awaits
Amanda Ripley demonstrates the consequences for having school sports in “The Case Against High School Sports” because schools are spending too much money on their sports and can be solved. The author brings to the reader’s eye that sports cost way too much money and should be cut. I think Ripley is wrong because even though it cost a lot of money, they should still keep the sports. If they cut the sports, then it’s not fair to the students that are graduating because they could of had a chance to get a scholarship. If the schools cut the sports, then there is no chance for the students.
The stress can get so intense, it feels paralyzing. That’s why it is important than ever for schools to invest in their athletic programs,” states the sports article “Should Schools get rid of Sports.” Schools should keep their sports programs because they help improve academics, help improve mental and emotional health, and improves social skills like being on a team. Schools should not get rid of their sports programs because they help with student’s academics.
Why not fund sports when it is the only thing fighting against the addiction of technology. In the end, the more time dedicated to sports is equal to less screen time which overall will make humans more fit. Funding sports decreases dropout rates, and teaches life Lessons when also increasing GPA because to play sports players must have a 2.0 GPA or higher. Funding sports will increase participation, and as an effect more children gain life lessons. In the last article, “Should sports be eliminated from high schools” on paragraph 25 lines one and two, “High school sports give students unique experiences in which they learn the value of hardware frozen preservation dedication and commitment” As said in the text, throughout the life of play sports, students can learn certain life lessons not taught by computers.
Sports can enhance the cooperative and strategic strategies. The passage states that, “understanding the competitive process entails an appreciation of the social nature of competition, particularly with regard to the cooperative and strategic aspects of sports and an awareness of the nature of individual roles within a cooperating group.” The last reason, which it the academic benefits, proves that you shouldn’t take away the sports for school. The kids that play sports benefit in the classroom a lot more than regular students.