Treatment or Killing
In 1979 Charles Laverne Singleton convicted of murder Mary Lou York, owner of a grocery store. According to Police Officer testimony at the crime scene, Mary York before die identify Charles Laverne Singleton as whom convicted the crime before she died. She died in the way to the hospital due to bleeding of her neck wound. That same year, Singleton was sentenced to death. At the period that he was waiting to be executed he becomes mentally ill. Later, he was medically treated to improve his state of mind. Singleton's execution had been planned five times during the 25 years until 2004 that he was executed. Arkansas court received permission from the Supreme Court, on October 2003, to use medications for Charles Singleton,
…show more content…
He was treated while he was in prison on death row. For many years, Mr. Singleton consumes antipsychotic drugs voluntarily and sometimes were forcefully because he was danger to himself and others. He believed his victim is alive and waiting for him, so he was not very sensible. Base on Mental Health weekly (2003), “the Supreme Court ruled that capital punishment for people with mental retardation constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited under the Eighth Amendment” (p. 1). While Singleton’s lawyer shows evidence base on his client mental illness that he cannot be executed because drugs only reduces the symptoms of his illness and his was not wise enough to insist on his innocence. But the Arkansas court issued a death sentence against him and force him medication before the time of his execution on January 2004. Arkansas court puts doctors in dilemma, adhere to their medical oath or criminal law. Regarding to the medical oath, doctors are not allowed to participate in the execution or use of drugs to take people life. Duty’s doctors are helping and treatment of patients not killing the patient. (Eisenberg, 2004). This gave a moral framework that prohibited medical treatment to be executed. Regarding, drug administration it is only a doctor’s duty that can administer the effects of drugs, no one else is able to prescribe the drug because he or she does not know about drug’s effect on humans. In this case, giving medicine to the Singleton was contrary to medical goal because the purpose of medicine is treated not to kill a person. If Charles Laverne Singleton stays in prison, he did not harm anyone, and he was not a threat. He suffered from schizophrenic and it was a kind of
In the five years between 1803 and 1808, South Carolina alone imported 400,000 slaves (Jones, 2004). These were so many slaves that pushed slavery to other regions like Louisiana and Georgia. The Northern States were reluctant in fighting slave trade as they were more concerned about the new government and feared to be in conflicts with the south. Most of the states thought that slavery was a passing cloud and that it was bound to fail sooner. The invention of the cotton gin made the cash crop all the more lucrative.
One of the headlines in the news lately is about the Lyon sisters. This is a 40-year-old cold case. Hopefully the Lyon family can soon get closer over their daughters whom were kidnaped in March of 1975. On March 25th, 1975 Sheila and her sister Katherine Lyon went to a local mall. They were on their spring break from school.
New York Times (NYT) column-writer, conversely a certified lawyer, Adam Liptak, in his article, “Supreme Court Rejects Alabama Death Row Inmate’s Appeal”, describes how a death-row inmate from Alabama requests death by a firing squad as opposed to lethal injection, that contains the sedative midazolam, for his death sentence, but was rejected by the Supreme Court of the United States. Liptak’s purpose is to demonstrate that the Supreme Court’s decision to reject the appeal may have been unconstitutional due to the means of execution by lethal injection causing “prolonged torture” rather than a quick death due to midazolam, which disputes the eighth amendment in the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Liptak develops
February 29th, 2016, Jeffrey Bernard May was charged with four counts of sexual assault on a victim below the age of 12 and two counts of lewd and lascivious behavior. For case 2016 CF 1120 A (8) May was discharged but two other sexual assault cases still follow. The victim and in the case versus May was Erica England, May’s stepdaughter, who claimed to be sexually assaulted by May at the age of eleven. May married Erica’s mother, Lynn May, in October of 2000 and filed for divorce in 2015.
Describe the case in detail A 51 years old schizophrenic Bert Montoya was placed to live at Dorothea’s home by her social worker, Judy Moise. According to Judy, Dorothea told her that she was in the 70s and she actually was a nurse during WWII. She was known for donate money and cloths to charity and employee people in parole. She welcomed everyone in her home.
Overall, Stanley “Tookie” Williams did not deserve clemency. First, according to the article, “As a Criminal” it says “Williams scheduled to be executed at San Quentin State Prison Dec.13 for the shotgun murders of four people…” In other words Williams killed 4 people for what he was held in prison
Reason Case was accepted for investigation: On 12/2/17, Hennepin County Child Protection accepted a report of alleged predatory offender status concerning Tayshawn Robinson, Makayla Mason and Jemeul Robinson by their father’s partner Lillian Simmons. Per reporter received an anonymous report concerning children Tayshawn Makayla and Jemeul. Per reorter the children father’s partner Ms. Lillian Simmons was conited of murder in the 1st Degree in 1989. Ms. Lillian Simmons resides in the home with the children’s father Mr. Quincy Mason.
In the article “Botched Execution Shows Perils of Lethal Injection Drug Shortage” discusses that the pharmaceuticals being used in today’s death-row executions are not being supplied to prisons. Drug manufactures are no longer supplying the lethal drugs, stating the drugs are being used against the company’s wishes. Furthermore, correctional centers are buying drugs illegally or trading drugs with other states in order to continue the lethal injection to death-row inmates. The author states that correctional facilities have been taken to court and are refusing to disclose information as to what compounds they are using on death-row inmates.
The use of midazolam does not violate the 8th amendment. There have only been a few cases that have failed, and we have improved our strategy. Even if the execution takes more than the estimated amount of time, there is not a substantial amount of pain that would be consisered as cruel and unusual punishment. In addition, those being given capital punishment are deprived of life for taking away the lives of others. Opinion of the Court (Justice Samuel A Alito Jr.)
Both living and dying are both parts of life. In the healthcare field, death can not always be prevented. In Living and Dying in Brick City by Sampson Davis, MD, Sampson. Davis takes the reader to a journey that Davis has experienced.
Texas holds the title for the state with most executions in the United States gaining heavy scrutiny for the use of death penalty. Many are concerned that the death penalty is in direct violation of the 8th amendment of the constitution which forbids the act of cruel and unusual punishment as well as being wrong on a moral level. This becomes a hot button issue when mental illness comes into play as 30% of Texas's incarcerated inmates, have been clients of the state’s mental health system (“Texas Death Penalty”). Andre Lee Thomas is one of those inmates, sentenced to death, but also deemed mentally unstable.
Georgie Milton did something not many people have the guts to do, he took the life of his best friend to save him from the torture that awaited him, but, he took the life of another man and he took this life with the intention of murder. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, there is no difference between euthanasia and murder; and to this indictment, George Milton has pleaded not guilty. If I am to prove him otherwise, you must find him so. Lennie Small has been described to us as a caring giant. He had no bad intentions; and it is fair to say that our witnesses have provided us with sufficient evidence to support my argument.
In that case, the Supreme Court held that prison staff (whether doctors or officers or any others) violated the Eighth Amendment if they were deliberately indifferent to the serious medical needs of prisoners.
The films One Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest and, A Beautiful Mind portray Hollywood images of the treatment. It pictures the dramatic scene of a pleading patient dragged to a treatment room, forcibly administered electric currents as his jaw clenches, his back arches, and his body shakes while being held down by burly attendants or by foot and wrist restraints. The truth is that patients are not covered into treatment. They may be anxious and reluctant, but they come willingly. They have been told why the treatment is recommended, the procedures have been explained, and many have seen videos images of the procedures.
The Donald “Dax” Cowart presents a clear case in which the costs of requiring policy to defer to physicians' credo outweigh the potential benefits. The costs include patients' suffering and loss of liberty and physicians' involvement in hastening certain death, while the potential benefits are possible recovery and restoration to health for the patient and protecting the integrity of the medical code. He was repeatedly declared to be competent by a psychiatrist during this period. In Cowart's case, the value of patient autonomy may have ultimately outweighed a physician's responsibility to avoid participation in patients' death. This view is a concession to the theoretical goal that physicians never forego their pursuit of health and wellness,