In life there are few leaders and many followers. Leaders will heavily influence their followers as well as their opposers. In times of crisis, citizens will look upon their leaders for guidance. They trust that the leader will construct an efficient solution, and that the solution benefits everyone. Truly good leaders will sway their followers towards a noble intention, an intention that will contribute to the common good. They will always be altruistic, putting the well-being of their people in front of their own personal desires. That includes having the courage to stand up for your people and putting your well-being on the line for theirs. In addition to these characteristics, they are required to be objectively successful, whether it …show more content…
They must fulfill all these doctrines, and in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, conspirator and Roman senator Caius Cassius fails to exemplify these by displaying outbursts of greed, manipulation, corruption, and poor military strategy as the story continues. His ultimate character is revealed throughout the story, and as the power flows to him, he completely abuses it. In the latter stages of Act I Scene II, Cassius displays his manipulative and greedy characteristics in the public square where Caesar is speaking. Strangely enough, the reader is unaware that Cassius is exerting these characteristics here, but they make sense in the later acts. After Caesar is done speaking and everyone clears, only Cassius and a man named Brutus are left. With nobody around to eavesdrop, Cassius attempts to convince Brutus, who is a well-respected senator of Rome, to join his cause in …show more content…
During a fiery dispute at the tents, Brutus is infuriated and accuses Cassius of corrupting his army: “Let me tell you, Cassius, you yourself are much condemned to have an itching palm to sell and mart your offices for gold to undeservers.” Brutus is accusing Cassius of selling important positions in his army to unqualified people. With unqualified army officials, Cassius’s army has a likely chance to fail. Brutus now realizes that Cassius had manipulated him and only cared for money and political power. Brutus is deeply angered because he killed Caesar to combat corruption: “Did not great Julius bleed for justice' sake? What villain touched his body, that did stab, and not for justice?” Like manipulation, corruption is unfortunately common in leadership. Corruption prevents knowledgeable people from holding positions, and instead gives those positions to the rich. This has a detrimental effect on the citizens, because the officials’ lack of knowledge can lead them to make poor decisions which hurt the
Although at the military camp, the relationship between Brutus and Cassius gets weak due to each other’s unfavorable behaviors. The argument continues
/ Write them together, yours is as fair a name; / Sound them, it doth become the mouth as well; / Weigh them, it is as heavy" (1.2.142-146). Cassius continues in his adulation of his friend, in contrast to the mockery of Caesar. By showing loyalty and feigning agreement with Brutus' love of democratic government, Cassius develops ethos further and re-establishes his role as a dear friend. Though it is implied that Cassius is in the conspiracy because of his disdain for Caesar himself and not for a monarchy in
" Power thens to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutly" are the words said by Lord Acton and echoed throughout history. It is often that a historical leader has been dethroned because their judgment has been affected by their corruption. This is what was thought of the great Roman emperor, Julius Caesar, who was killed for this assmption. In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, it is not Caesar but Cassius who is the most corrupt character. Several characters suspect or play a part in the corruption of Cassius.
All societies want a leader who helps others and who is willing to do anything for his
His method of keeping immense power by using fear to manipulate citizens has been manifested for a long period of time, since the book The Prince was published. Similarly, his methods are manifested in William Shakespeare’s play, Julius Caesar with characters that are attractive and expressive, yet flawed. Although some of the characters from Julius Caesar did not manifest Machiavellian traits, those that did ran into the same consequences as those who didn’t, indicating that a disastrous ending awaits them either way.
A respected leader will, without a doubt, speak well of their community, city, or country. He/ She will also give credit where it’s due, and admit when he/ she is wrong. When a leader commits to qualities like these, people will surely
In William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, Cassius is a foil to Marcus Brutus, for Brutus is consistently described as honorable and kind, contrasting the always clever and self-centered, Cassius. Cassius acts as a character who goes against the virtues and weaknesses of the main character. Brutus announces, “Why man, he doth bestride the narrow World like a Colossus, and we pretty men Walk under his huge legs and peep about To find ourselves dishonorable graves” (Shakespeare I. 2. 142-145). By appealing to Brutus' feeling of honor and loyalty to Rome, Cassius hopes to persuade him to join the conspiracy against Caesar.
In this scene, Cassius says to Brutus, “And this man is now become a god, and Cassius is a wretched creature and must bend his body if Caesar carelessly but nod on him.” (1.2.115-118). This quote emphasizes Caesar's increasing power and suggests that he may become repressive, causing concern for the stability of Rome’s government. Furthermore, Cassius plays on Brutus' compassion for Rome, stating, "Well, Brutus, thou art noble; yet I see/ Thy honorable mettle may be wrought/ From that it is disposed.
A nation’s success is tied to the effectiveness of the governing body leading that nation. Throughout world history, humans have searched for a way to create a stable community in which many different families can come together in a society. These societies require a form of leadership to help create order amongst the people. When an effective form of government came to be in a society, that society grew, and shaped the region around it.
Cassius saves the life of Caesar, sees him beg for water, and witnesses his epileptic seizure. From these weaknesses, Cassius finds himself to be just as worthy of the crown as is Caesar. His reasons are emotionally tied to getting rid of Caesar, Brutus chooses to become a conspirator for the good of Rome. He does not know how Caesar will use his power.
A rightful, just and successful leader has to be able to know when to listen to his people and when it’s necessary to adapt to the people’s will.
He could be manipulative and scheming, allowing his flesh to rule his heart. Cassius hated to be subservient to any man, and especially to Caesar. Upset by the rich and powerful who allowed Caesar to rule, he began to think of a way to remove Caesar from his throne. By using other men's good intentions, Cassius orchestrated and
Cassius is often referred to as a villain in the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. A villain is a play or stories antagonist. Traits of a villain include manipulative and untrustworthy. Cassius was a known companion of Caesar’s that was an active part in the assassination (Gaius). First of all, Cassius manipulates Brutus and the rest of the conspirators into helping him assassinate Caesar.
In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus is peer pressured into joining the conspirators and he is also instigated to join the conspirators and to be against Caesar. In Act 1 Scene 1 Cassius says“‘The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars But in ourselves that we are underlings, Brutus and Caesar: what should be in that ‘Caesar’
Through Machiavelli’s representation of his ideal leader, Cesare Borgia, he expresses the importance of cruelty in establishing and holding power. As Machiavelli developed his principles from Borgia’s leadership, he communicates that for a leader to be successful and feared, he must be cruel. Accordingly, Shakespeare’s representation of Julius Caesar reveals him as a successful warrior and leader of Rome. Caesar’s military success depicts him as a violent and cruel leader, the ideal leader by Machiavellian principle. “The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones.”