The performers did an excellent job acting out the parts they were assigned. In the beginning of the first act, I made a note of them being very rocky in the beginning and only acting with their body language and not much with their emotions, but once they got more comfortable on stage they brought the characters to life. The main actor, Chaz Pitman, who played the role as Ben, impressed me the most because he was both the main actor and the director of the play. His acting was very believable and at the end when he was having a mental breakdown, I shed a few tears due to how convincing he made it seem. Jeeter and Salyer, who were played by Hal Greer and Kat Lys were the other two actors who captivated my attention. They were able to convince me that they were dating in a scene where they just laughed and told stories while cuddling up to one another. It was very impressive due to the age gap between them that they were still able to play the role without making it uncomfortable. …show more content…
He not only made sure the play went as planned, but he took initiative to step in and be an example to the other actors on stage with him. He took to his character naturally which is no surprise to me, seeing he enjoyed the subject of the play. Chaz Pitman took the stage and became Ben not only in his costume, but also with his emotion filled words. It was clear to see that he really had a passion for this story line and the character he was playing as well as how he molded the scene for the other actors. He also picked the songs that would play throughout the acts and they were spot on to every situation. If I did not know better, I would assume he fit so well into the character because he was a war veteran himself, but they never mentioned that in the director’s commentary. He had a vision of what they play would be like and he stopped at nothing to get that vision across
The stage performance did an excellent job being true to the play. The stage manager, who is
He was “shell-shocked” or had “combat stress” at the time, as many soldiers leaving the front lines did. They were used to war and witnessed the horrors of war. They were not being themselves. This often happens today with veterans having PTSD and this can be seen in the novel in almost all the characters. Because of the shell-shock, many of the soldiers were not themselves.
The black box theater is a very intimate setting to begin with, and as I took my seat in the theater, I felt that intimacy. The theater was dark, and the audience was virtually silent before the production began. As I sat waiting for the performance to begin, I took in the lighting, the props, and the set as a whole, and I began to feel as if I were sitting just at the edge of a different time period. The design element that stood out most to me was the lighting of the river because the gobos and the selection of down lights made the river come to life, almost as if it was another character in this production. I was definitely drawn into the world of this play due to the intimacy of the black box theater and the lighting design of the
He did everything he could to help his war brothers and his family at home. There is a quote that can hit a reader deeply because he talks about one of his brothers (a friend in war) dying. “Why hadn’t I put myself there?” (Kyle et al.) This really should and can speak to a reader.
One would assume that the unique bond shared between them would lead to the start of a formal relationship, but to our surprise the couple was not united at the end of the film. Again, supporting the claims of an
He stood up to general Gates when he said he couldn’t have the men win. Also he has tremendous abilities because he stood up for what he believed in. When the Hessian Colonel Rall got shot he did not want to visit him because he believed that he should not
The kids were clamoring to get their pictures taken with the cast. To me the most impressive part of the experience was watching the interaction between the actors and the kids. The actors clearly understood they were still playing a role and that they had to be giving of their time and energy to them. Seeing the kids reactions solidifies that shows like this will keep the theatre culture growing by building new generations of audience
Over the weekend, IRSC put on an amazing version of Victor Glalanella’s Frankenstein. The production was a wonderful work of acting, costume, and set design. Director David Moberg did an amazing job putting this play together. The acting was very strong and clear to understand despite the rare slip on lines. The costumes matched very well with the show and time period, especially the women’s dresses.
He tried to play the part just so he could get a job, but when his character is really broken down, it is easy to see what kind of a person he really is. The people were not sure that he was in Military, or anything else about him. The only evidence that lent to his story of coming from the military was how he went about his killing spree. He had a very militaristic way of doing things, but it was still never proved he came from the military. He simply was an out of place person in the wrong community for him.
There’s no doubt the characters are delightful. Each one is bright, colorful, and eccentric. Each is very original and refreshing. The audience roots for each other. Ben is “stuck” in Mulch.
The productions of this play were successful through stage design, lighting crewing, and acting. Those three aspects made the quality of the play stand out to me, as an audience member. The production of the set design of the play was a good effort. The set design for the play staging aims for the sweet spot between feeding adult nostalgia and satisfying a new generation of children.
“The Play That Goes Wrong” required a very detailed strategic plan of the arranged props and set design that actors need to follow in their performance. I believe the performers did a marvelous job in following the detailed choreography of the show. One of the most memorable cast members was Nancy Zamit. She played Annie the stage manager, who took the spotlight when she was forced into playing Charles’ fiancée named Sandra because the original female lead got "knocked unconscious” in the middle of the play. As terribly shy as she was, Zamit intensified the enjoyment of the audience as her character was reading off lines from pages of the script very awkwardly and awfully in an unfitted red dress and wig.
Overall, the quality of the play was excellent, I really enjoyed the music, somewhat comedy, and the message they were trying to share among the society. In the end of the play, the musical dance with the bear represent strong unity, even whatever their issues in their life. Therefore, one thing I learned from this awesome play was, even if one person stands up against the society, then the next one will follow
I liked that Paula Vogel did not hold back and let all of the emotions of the play loose. I am anticipating that I will enjoy the play. I personally think I would like it more if the characters were portrayed by only people rather that people holding puppets, but they have too much symbolic meaning to be left out. I think the puppets are meant to resemble the fact that we really have no control over our own lives as children. The release of the real people from the puppets into adults symbolizes the freedom from their
Matthew Bratko portrayed this character and did it very well. He had very good delivery of his lines which made the comedy of the dialogue funnier. For instance, when describing