There are many things that make “Citizen Kane” considered as possibly one of the greatest films every made; to the eyes of the passive audience this film may not seem the most amazing, most people being accustomed to the classical Hollywood style, but to the audience with an eye for the complex, “Citizen Kane” breaks the traditional Hollywood mold and forges its own path for the better. Exposition is one of the most key features of a film, it’s meant introduce important characters and give the audience relevant details and and dutifully suppress knowledge in turn. “Citizen Kane” does not follow this Classic Hollywood style exposition, instead going above and beyond to open the film with revealing as little information as possible and confuse/intrigue
“Citizen Kane” was produced in 1941. In the year 1941 there was a lot going on throughout America such as getting over the great depression with FDR. Hitler’s run in Germany also affected the US with WWII, but that didn’t stop the young director Orson Welles. “Citizen Kane” was Welles first Hollywood film and he was only 26 years old when he directed it and acted in it. Welles was known before this film because he had a popular radio broadcast called “War of the Worlds.”
I believe that basing the film on his life brought both advantages and disadvantages. To start off, I think the advantages of this was that Charles Foster Kane was such a recognizable character and people would be familiar with who William Randolph Hearst. That when people watched this film, the audience will go out after watching it and talk about it more, getting lots of press. But also, the disadvantage was that Hearst did not want this film to get views, so he banned/prohibited the film to be advertized and mentioned in any way. From the film not getting publicity, this led to people thinking that the film was a bad move, which probably made the views drop down.
History vs. Hollywood Semester Film Analysis E.C. Assignment Up to 5 Extra Credit Points – Due 1/22/18 Question 1: Summarize the story in the film (not the actual history). Born to Austrian nobility, Marie Antoinette who is only 14 years old , is said to marry Louis XVI, the king of France, in an alliance that has everything to do with politics and nothing to do with love. Sent to France and literally stripped of her former life, including all clothes she wore that were from Austria, Marie weds Louis, but to the consternation of the royal court, he seems either unwilling to accept the marriage while their advisors clamor for an heir to the throne. Young and more than a bit out of step with the new life that she is living, Marie gives herself
and he attempts to do this by isolating himself from everyone and focusing on his goal. Money is the reason why both Gatsby and Charles Kane died without developing a long lasting relationship with anyone. Isolation is an obvious theme in the film Citizen Kane directed by Orson Welles. The movie is essentially the telling of Charles Foster Kane’s life story told in different perspectives through different parts of his life. The theme of isolation is everywhere throughout the movie especially in the first scene of Charles Kane’s childhood where he is playing by himself in the snow.
Citizen Kane starts off with two silent clips. The first clip tells us who the movie was directed by, followed by the title of the picture. After these two clips take place, the mood starts to set. Cue the dark, gloomy and mysterious tone from the music that is played when the black and white images of the surroundings and many areas of Kane’s castle appear. All images are shady; there is almost no light.
I believe what Orson Welles is trying to portray through the movie Citizen Kane is the difficulty that goes into describing a person’s life after they have passed on. The reporter Thompson investigates Kane’s story and witnesses it unfold as it is told by those closest to him. Although this makes you wonder how different it would have been if Kane got to tell his own story rather than rely on the reminiscences of his colleagues because not a single one of these people knew or could figure out what drove Charles Foster Kane. The only person who could have fully understood Kane was Thatcher, but his concerns focused more on making money rather than the loneliness of a child. With each perspective we get on Kane’s life as well as the lack of his own point of view, it forces us to question what truly mattered in Kane’s life.
The Rise and Fall of Charles Foster Kane through Cinematographic Effects Citizen Kane has been considered as one of the best films ever created. Since its release in 1941, the magnificent film is still influencing the movie world today and its infamous “Rosebud” quote is still one of the top film quotes of all time. Orson Welles was the director, producer, star, and co-writer of the film. He based a big portion of his protagonist, Charles Foster Kane, on the big time Newspaper Publisher William Randolph Hearst. When realizing what the film was based on, Hearst threaten movie theaters into not featuring the film and he greatly limited the advertisement of it.
Editing and Cinematography Analysis Introduction The selected movie for this analysis is the "Man With a Movie Camera" produced by Vertov, 1928. The film presents a man traveling around the city with his camera and capturing different scenes. The man carries the camera over his shoulder and seems to document the life people are leading the urban area. Looking at the movie, we can see the camera man shooting but there is no one footage of what he was capturing is presented in the film.
Citizen Kane Review Citizen Kane (1941) is a drama movie directed by Orson Welles, who also has the main role in the movie; his character: Charles Foster Kane. The story starts at the end of the life of the tycoon Charles Foster Kane, at his very last breath, which he uses to pronounce the word “Rosebud”, while a snow globe falls from his hands. This beginning is what catches the spectator’s attention within the first thirty seconds into the movie: The mystery about the meaning of that scene, that word and the sudden change of the background and how the story begins to be unveiled through flashbacks and raccontos. From the memories, we discover a different man; instead of the story being the life of the millionaire Charles Foster Kane, we realize
Citizen Kane challenged the traditional narrative and technical elements of classic Hollywood cinema mainly in the area of sound. Orson Welles was ahead of his time when he created his works of manipulating sound to transfer meaning in the film Citizen Kane. Welles used concealed hanging microphones to obtain different levels of sound throughout the film. The manner, in which the story was told, from Kane’s death flashbacked to his life of success and ultimate failure, was also a new style of storytelling for films. Welles also used symbolism with his last mumbling word “Rosebud.”
The use of symbolism and expressionism is paramount to both the narrative and to the theme. Meaning of some of the symbols are; • Mirrors: The mirrors in the movie Citizen Kane shows how Kane has different series of mirrors in his life in which his image has duplicated infinitely. Metaphorically, these mirrors continuously showed us different versions of Kane. • Puzzles: The jigsaw puzzle shows how Susan Alexander used to play with them very often not merely for fun but also as a way to fulfill her unyielding existence with Kane. The jigsaw puzzle shows how all pieces always don’t fit in properly, similarly, Susan and Kane’s personalities were very different that created unresolved issues and conflicts in their lives.
Citizen Kane by Orson Welles is a cinematic classic, released in 1941. Citizen Kane challenged traditional narrative and technical elements of classic Hollywood cinema. Kane was narrated by several people that include their take on Kane’s life. The story unfolds by many flashbacks and is told by different perspectives over the years through different narrations. Charles Foster Kane was a millionaire, head of newspapers and died saying “rosebud”.
1, the movie did not perform as well when it came to box office revenue. Just because it did not make a large amount of money does not mean it was a bad movie, but typically the movies that are liked make large amounts of money, and the films that do not gross nearly as much are not seen as good in the eyes of the consumer. Although there might be a discrepancy with advertising and the use of famous actors, the income a movie generates is usually directly proportional to its popularity among the people. What truly makes Citizen Kane different from these two influential movies is the appeal of the story. Citizen Kane had trouble catching the interest of the public because of its largely uneventful story.
In this essay I will be comparing the themes and the narrative techniques used in both films. Starting off with the film “Citizen Kane” as mentioned it is a story of a millionaire, Charles Foster Kane. It begins with Kane’s death and speaks a single word: “Rosebud”. The reporters in the hunt to know
“Citizen Kane” is a tale of the “Charles Foster Kane”. “Citizen Kane” was one among the major controversial movies continually built up. Kane was one of the most controversial films ever made. Hearst, affronted from his representation, presented RKO a diminutive chance to wipe out the movie. When that attempt did not work, newspapers of the Hearst go aboard on an operation of denouncement in opposition to Welles, therefore demonstrating that the dishonesty of the press and the condemnation of the power in film were specifically the aim.