What Was The Significance Of The Compromise Of 1850

472 Words2 Pages

The significance of the Compromise of 1850 lies on the continuation of peace accomplished by the Missouri Compromise of 1820, in spite of sectional contrasts. Opinions from the north and south were opposite, but the Compromise of 1850 made them achieve an interim political harmony. It fulfilled what it planned to accomplish at the time, to revive the Union and peace. Most politicians realized that the compromise was an interwoven and that it was an interim arrangement, best case scenario to delay the unavoidable Civil War.
In a session of give and take, the north and south were not so satisfied by what they got. The south gained by the strengthening of the fugitive slave law while the north gained another free state, California. Texas lost territory but was however remunerated with 10 million dollars to pay for its debts. The exchange of slaves was prohibited in Washington DC, yet slavery was most certainly not. Slavery was not limited in the territories of Utah and New Mexico. These actions, although they solved the problem regarding California 's status as a free or slave state, did not provide any long-term, fundamental principle for future decisions on the sectional balance of new territories.
The Compromise of 1850 additionally permitted …show more content…

The unintended result was a surge of pro-slavery and abolitionist supporters to Kansas to vote in favor of slavery or its repeal. The act nullified the 1820 Missouri Compromise as Kansas had been formally a slavery-free territory. The outcome was a civil war in Kansas known as the Bleeding Kansas, which was to be a prelude to the American Civil War. The Republican Party was made because of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and became the leading party in the north. In 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected as the first Republican president of the United

Open Document