Rhetorical Devices and Strategies Impact on Child Labor
Speeches are an effective way to communicate big ideas and changes to a select audience. The human to human connection that speeches provide is vital to the speaker's ability to get a point across. But speeches can also be dull, and empty. They require the use of rhetorical devices to catch the audience’s attention and create meaning. In 1905, prominent social reformer Florence Kelley delivered a speech to the National American Woman Suffrage Association regarding the use of child labor in the nation. In her speech, Kelley used a variety of rhetorical strategies, particularly pathos, to engage her audience and convey her message.
At the very start of her speech Kelley established what
…show more content…
For example, Kelley claims, “Several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and the looms spinning and weaving cotton and wool…” (18-21). In this instance, Kelley exercises the use of an asyndeton. She adds on more and more sounds to the image of the girls working in the mills to create an entire scene that immerses the audience and gives them a feeling of what it is like to be one of the girls. Shortly after this, in reference to the length of day a child is permitted to work, Kelley laments, “A girl of six or seven years, just tall enough to reach the bobbins, may work eleven hours by day or by night” (32-34). In addition to the imagery of the young girl being just tall enough, Kelley juxtaposes day and night to let the audience know that there is no limit to how long they were allowed to work. To further enforce this idea, Kelley says that children could “enjoy the pitiful privilege of working all night long” (44-45). Through simple rhetorical devices, juxtaposition, imagery, and an oxymoron, Kelley is able to involve the audience and further emotionally tie them to the plight that these children …show more content…
Her sentences become more emphatic and she accentuates the word “we.” Whereas many of her statements up to this point were solely about what the children face, she now offers solutions and hope: “There is one line of action by which we can do much. We can enlist the workingmen on behalf of our enfranchisement just in proportion as we strive with them to free the children” (85-89). This reinforces the idea that Kelley is attempting to merge both movements, but that she would also like some help from men, especially considering that it was the only way for change to happen at the time. It also shows that she wants their efforts to be united and joined together for maximum results. Kelley could not make this point any clearer, with her last proclamation being, “For the sake of the children, for the Republic in which these children will vote after we are dead, and for the sake of our cause, we should enlist the workingmen voters, with us, in this task of freeing the children from toil” (92-96)! Besides the glaring attempt to convince the other women that they require the help of other men to help the children, she also says “with us.” Her exclamation shows that she knows that to end child labor it will take support from all groups of people, men and women alike, given that women themselves are provided the opportunity to vote. Her borderline anger shows the raw passion she has for the subject and how
Florence Kelley portrays her reasoning of decreasing child labor through the employing of repetition. In the speech Kelley reiterates the phrase "an while we sleep little white girls will be working tonight in the mills... eleven hours a night". The repetition emphasizes the long harsh hours kids have to endure, at such a young age, while adults are sleeping in their nice, warm homes. This creates a sense of pathos because it makes people feel guilty for ignoring the facts of cruel child labor, thinking it is not bringing any harm to them.
Florence Kelly was a United States social worker and reformed who fought successfully for child labor laws and improved conditions. She couldn’t believe how some states were allowing children to work for as many hours as they did. She gave a speech to the NAWSA or the National American Woman Suffrage Association on how it has gotten too far with child labor. In her speech she uses examples of rhetorical strategies to convey her message to her audience. It seems her message was conveyed not only to her audience, but to the world.
July 22nd, 1905 Florence Kelly delivered a speech about the unfairness of child labor at a National American Women Suffrage Association conference. Throughout this speech Kelly uses rhetorical strategies such as repetition, sarcasm, and an appeal to the audiences emotions to express the issue of child labor in America. Kelley uses repetition in this piece to emphasize the importance of her argument about child labor. In paragraph two, talking about the rapid increase in the amount of fourteen to twenty year old women who are working, she says, “ Men increase, women increase, youth increase, boys increase.”
Florence Kelley is a reformer and social worker who was an advocate for working women and young children. She had a mission to change child labor laws in all states and improve the condition for working-class women. In her speech, she discusses the reality of child labor and the laws that certain states have in place for child labor. In the first two paragraphs, Kelley establishes her credibility by using key facts and statistics such as “We have, in this country, two million children under the age of sixteen years who are earning their bread” and “No other portion of the wage earning class increased so rapidly from decade to decade as young girls from fourteen to twenty girls.” She also mentions the facts about laws in other states such as
In Florence Kelley’s speech to the National American Woman Suffrage Association, she brings to light the issue of child labour in a serious and somber tone. Using pathos and persuasive rhetoric, Kelley skillfully manipulates her fellow women to become motivated to gain the right to vote in order to take action against the evils of child labour. Kelley’s speech is filled with pathos, attempting to persuade her audience to realize the magnitude of the issue of child employment to pull the heartstrings of women. She introduces the problem as “two million children under the age of sixteen years old who are earning their bread,” showing the large number of young people currently working to earn money to make a living.
Kelley explains, “We have...two million children under the age of sixteen years who are earning their bread”. By her use of statistics, she has grabbed the audience’s attention. With large numbers like two million, one already begins to question child labor. Kelley then goes on to
Throughout her speech to the National American Woman Suffrage Association on July 22, 1905, Florence Kelley emphasizes the need to modify working conditions for children across the United States. During her speech, the social reformer encourages the women attending the convention in Philadelphia to join her in the fight for labor rights for children. By adopting a stern and persuasive tone, Kelley argues that the exploitation of child labor is a significant issue within the United States. Kelley employs plural pronouns to represent the collective responsibility society has in ending child labor, repetitive phrases to emphasize how widespread the issue is, and rhetorical questions to suggest possible ideas of reform. Most importantly, Kelley utilizes the plural pronoun “we” throughout her speech to establish a sense of unity among the men and women in America and children subject to child labor.
Kelley uses strong centralizing diction, such as “We have, in this country, two million children under the age of sixteen who are earning their bread” (1-3), to make her listeners aware of what’s going on in their own country regarding children. Since the people at this convention are women suffrage supporters, they might not be aware of the extent of child labor present. By using words such as “we” and “in this country”, it solidifies that the convention attendees can be a part of the solution due to them being part of the United States. As a result, the people listening to her speech are being persuaded first to fight for women's suffrage in order to help these children who don’t have a voice. The unification encourages the audience to look for a solution for children working in harsh conditions because they have the ability to make a
During her address she used various rhetorical devices, the most notable of which were pathos, rhetorical questions, and logos. These rhetorical devices very effectively helped
Near the end of Kelley’s speech, she states, “For the sake of the children, for the Republic in which these children will vote after we are dead, and for the sake of our cause, we should enlist the workingmen voters, with us, in this task of freeing the children from toil!” Kelley’s use of the word “toil” demonstrates the agony children have undergone due to a lack of child labor laws and is supposed to leave a memorable mark on her audience. Additionally, when Kelley discusses the adult’s perspective on the issues of these child labor laws, Kelley states that “we do not wish this. We prefer to have our work done by men and women. But we are almost powerless.”
At the beginning of the speech, Kelley explains that “two million children under the age of sixteen are earning their [family’s] bread” and serve as a source of income to support households (1-3). Kelley then goes on to disclose that many states have no minimum age requirements for workers which can cause elementary-age children to work in factories and mills at night. Kelley uses the metonymy of bread to refer to money and explains how the child is an important source of income for many families. By elaborating on the ages at which children work, Kelley demonstrates to the audience that anyone can be a victim of the horrors of child labor and attempts to cause the audience to feel empathy toward the children in their situation. Similarly, Kelley employs the oxymoron of “deafening noise” to refer to the poor conditions that children face throughout the night.
Child Labor Analysis Child Labor was one of Florence Kelley’s main topics at a speech she gave in Philadelphia during a convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association. Kelley talks about all the horrors children were going through and the injustices they were suffering. She talks of the conditions children working in, the hours they were going in, and all in all, how wrong child labor was. Her purpose for this was to gain support of people to petition for the end of child labor. Kelley’s appeals to Ethos, Pathos and Logos through the use of great rhetoric is what allows her to achieve her purpose.
In her speech, written to persuade her audience to help put an end to child labor, Florence Kelley employs many rhetorical devices. America in 1905, we learned, was riddled with inadequate labor laws, as well as working conditions. In order to convey her message, that these unethical statues need to be amended, Kelley uses rhetorical strategies such as pathos, parallelism, and illustration. Pathos is found throughout the entire speech, particularly emphasizing the horrific jobs the children were performing under terrible conditions and for countless hours. The descriptions of these appeal to the readers emotions, as the facts that she shares depict scenes we consider unusual even for adults.
Children from as young as the age of 6 began working in factories, the beginning of their exploitation, to meet demands of items and financial need for families. In Florence Kelley’s speech before the National American Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia 1905, Kelley addresses the overwhelming problem of child labor in the United States. The imagery, appeal to logic, and the diction Kelley uses in her speech emphasizes the exploitation of children in the child labor crisis in twentieth century America. Kelley’s use of imagery assists her audience in visualizing the inhumanity of the practice.
Child labor was a great concern in the Industrial revolution but very few people did something to stop it. Women and Children were forced to work more than 10 hours a day with only forty minutes to have lunch. Elizabeth Bentley once said that they didn’t have any time to have breakfast or drink anything during the day. They worked standing up and if they didn’t do their work on time they were strapped (whipped). Children were treating like they were not important, like they didn’t deserve a better life.