Throughout Australia's history, asylum seekers and refugees have had a significantly important and positive effect on the nation and its society. They both have had fundamentally important impacts on Australia. Refugees and asylum seekers have two distinct meanings, an asylum seeker is an individual who is seeking protection in another country but their claims have not yet been accepted and are in a review phase they will not be allowed in the country and are denied work rights. While a refugee is a person who has fled their country of origin due to many internal problems and is unable to return, their claims have been accepted by the country that they have sought asylum for and is been let in the country. Some of the important and crucial …show more content…
More than 10 million people have migrated to Australia. The migrations were motivated due to there being events like the 1850s gold rush and a never-ending desire for skilled labour. Migrants from all around the world have also moved to Australia to peruse a better life not only for themselves but for their family as well. Immigration increased dramatically after World War 2 when much of Europe was destroyed and people migrated to countries that were not affected by the war, for example, Australia and United States of America. According to Museums Victoria Collections during 1947 to 1981 over a million people from Briton immigrated to Australia majority of whom travelled under the ten pound assisted passage scheme which allowed for more of an affordable travel to Australia …show more content…
This is because they are being kept in to offshore detention centres for vast amounts of time and are not given any details of when they will arrive in Australia and are also denied work rights while their claims are being investigated. The people put inside these camps have been enduring horrible condition and have limited human rights while they are kept there. When asylum seekers try and come to Australia by boat they are transferred to two offshore detention centres which are located on two islands in the Pacific Ocean. These islands are called Manus and Nauru. Both offshore detention centres where opened in 2001 by then Prime Minister John Howards government as a part of his Pacific Solution. The Pacific Solution was implemented to stop people from making a treacherous voyage from their countries by boat to Australia. This worked as the number of people that travelled to Australia by boat after the implement drastically decreased. It went from 5516 people in 2001 below 150 annually until 2008 according to Wikipedia (reference). Due to an election promise by former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd both detention centres where suspended. In August 2012 former Prime Minister Julia Gillard reopened both of the offshore detention facilities this was due to a drastic increase in the number of asylum seekers that were arriving in Australia by boat. In 2013 it was stated by the Australian government that any
Women and Honourable men, a refugee is a man who is outside their own particular nation and can 't or unwilling to return because of a well - established trepidation of being abused in view of their, Race,Religion, Nationality, political position or is an individual from a specific social gathering. A Asylum seeker is a man who has fled their nation to apply for a displaced person status yet has not been surveyed yet. Presently here 's the inquiry, why do Asylum Seekers and Refugees escape their nation? There are different reasons in the matter of why they escape their nation, these reasons incorporate war, Political Perspectives, racial segregation, religious convictions, or even mistreatment. These individuals have experienced a considerable measure just to sail to Australia, some have even put in all they have,examples of this are such things as, cash, house, furniture, apparel etc.
Migration has been an important influence on Australian society and the economy. Between 1947 and 1982, over a million Britons immigrated to Australia, the majority of whom travelled under the ten pound assisted passage scheme funded by the British and Australian governments. This large intake of British migrants was encouraged as part of Australia's 'populate or perish' nation-building initiative, which emerged in the aftermath of World War II. The Ten Pound Poms, as they became known 82% were English were mostly from an urban background.
RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS CAT THE BRINGING THEM HOME REPORT WAS A SIGNIFICANT EVENT FOR THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER PEOPLES. The ‘Bringing Them Home Report’ was a significant event for the civil rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, as what they experienced between 1910 to 1970 was something no human being should have to go through, The Stolen Generations suffered a great deal of traumatic experiences. On 11 of May 1995 change, had to take place as this wasn’t a lifestyle a human being should live, the inquiry period began for The Bringing Them Home Report.
Why do asylum seekers still take the high risks to come to Australia by boat or some illegal ways while they know the journey is dangerous and will possibly get them expatriated? I am writing to you with the concern about the rights of refugees and asylum seekers and how harshly Australian Government treated them. The documentary “Go Back to Where You Came From” Series 1 has presented a deeper insight of how desperate and harsh conditions of life are as a refugee by six ordinary Australian participants of varying ages and backgrounds, with strong opinions about the issue of refugees and asylum seekers. The issue of asylum seekers is an important issue of human rights. The main parties of the Australian Parliament are currently engaged in a heated debate on the issue of the refugees and asylum seekers.
In world war 2 Australia had lot of Jew refuges enter their borders Australia denied entry to al lot of Jew because of this they got sent to concentration camps. As a result of this most of them
The treatment of refugees and asylum seekers in Australia is unacceptable and with mandatory detention it makes matters even worse. The treatment that families and children go through is a monstrosity. All of the reasons that have been listed is why ‘If I could change one thing about Australia’ it would be changing the way refugees are treated here and making them feel safe in Australia by connecting them to the
Since 1992 and under the Migration Act, asylum seekers that arrive to Australia without a valid visa must be held in an immigration detention until they are granted a visa or removed from the (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2016). Although this law is effective, it is obvious that this is not the best option for the country, and is not working as planned. If an asylum seeker arrives to Australia without a visa, or ‘unauthorised’, they must be held in mandatory detention whilst their refugee claims are decided, (Australian Human Rights Commission, 2005) along with their health, identity and security check to be completed. These processes can be lengthy and difficult, meaning that the asylum seeker or refugee may be held in detention for much longer than needed.
Every refugee was once an asylum seeker, people seem to think that they are the same types of people where as an asylum seeker is someone who was forced to flee from his or her country – like refugees – and are trying to seek protection, but whose case for a refugee status has not yet been evaluated. Another difference between an asylum seeker and a refugee is if a refugee is seen or found by a person of the Australian Government, that government member cannot force them to go back to their country. But if an asylum seeker was caught a government member could send them back to their country, as they do not have the official paperwork to be an Australian
Australia has been labelled as the country of mateship, fair-go and tolerance, but the mistreatment of Asylum seekers in Australia denies these values. In our anthem we sing “For those who’ve come across the seas, we’ve boundless plains to share”. It ironic isn’t it? As when Asylum seekers arrive in Australia we do not offer a hand of mateship instead we use punitive matters such as sending them to mandatory detention, which shows how xenophobia is manifested in Australia (Ariyawansa,
This analysis looks at refugees and the social justice issue of Australia’s discriminatory treatment of refugees traveling to Australia seeking asylum. Australia’s current treatment of Asylum seekers includes taking them from an already extremely stressful environment and detaining them in remote detention facilities where they have limited interaction with family and friends. In some instances, this includes children and young people. The University western Sydney (2016)
In Australia, refugees and asylum seekers are treated like the enemy in a war: the target of a highly resourced, military-led “deterrence” strategy complete with arbitrary detainment, detention camps, guards to terrorise them, forced deportations and the violent suppression of those who protest. Australia is failing to meet the standards required when regarding the treatment of asylum seekers. It is fact that asylum seekers make up less than 3% of Australia’s annual immigration yet the idea is being distorted to that of which they will overpopulate a country that prides itself on being a multicultural society. I want to shed light on the misconception that asylum seekers are not ‘legal’ when in actual fact it is a human right to seek freedom.
Families entering the refuge countries suffer from displacement and separation, grief and mental agony, gross violence in their countries of origin and are needy, helpless and vulnerable who need to be taken care of. Australia for example has ratified numerous
Article 12 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights declares that ‘Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.’ Governments and then subsequently the courts, have a duty to ensure that a person 's freedom of movement is not unjustifiably restricted by others, including persons or companies. This right applies to all persons lawfully within Australian and not just Australian
The case of Chen v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2013) 216 FCR 241 presents a valuable example of a real-life situation that highlights the significance of understanding and interpreting the law that applies to Australian Migration practice. The case was about whether a valid visa application has been made by the appellant in accordance with Regulations 2.10 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations) which required applications for particular visa be made at an “office of immigration” in Australia. LEGAL ISSUES RAISED BY THE CASE: • The Minister did not consider Chen’s visa application for Class DF subclass 892 as valid because the application reached the Department’s Processing Centre one day after her existing
Not only that, but they do it by the millions, moving in independent crowds step by step on the grounds that there is security (Acuesta, 2017). The explanations for their movement include issues such as social, racial, religious and political persecution, war, climate change, hunger and gender orientation. These vulnerable refugees have no other choice than to seek protection and we are denying their human rights and stripping away their human dignity. A United Nations Refugee Agency survey conducted in Australia in 2011 showed that 35% of people favoured turning back boats or detention of arrivals and deportation, while only 22% favoured eligibility for permanent settlement. Clearly there is much controversy surrounding this issue as it can create many effects within a nations, both positive and negative.