Being Insurgent in Red Queen and Lakota Woman There is no consequence for abusing someone who is deemed inferior to you. In the colonial days of America, there was no consequence, other than depreciation of monetary value, for beating or killing a slave because they were inferior to their masters. This concept can be applied to how and why each lesser faction in the texts Lakota Woman and Red Queen is allowed to be treated so poorly. In Lakota Woman, the native and Half-bloods are “the other” and because the whites are so numerous and powerful, they made the laws and dictated how the indians are perceived in American Society. Though as Mary Crow Dog, the leading character in Lakota Woman, grows older she becomes involved in civil rights …show more content…
In Lakota Woman the Indians are surrounded by whites who do not permit them to live their lives freely and constantly influence their specific culture. The Reds in Red Queen are also enveloped by the heavy dictatorship of the preponderance, the Silvers, and are not free to improve their lives and live them without dense control of the Silvers. The Natives, according to Crow Dog lead hard poor lives where she is essentially forced into “being a backwoods girl living in a city, having to rip off stores in order to survive.” (Crow Dog 5) Similarly in Red Queen, Mare is obliged to be a pickpocket because she and her family are so poor and usually hungry. Both the Indians and the Reds hate their autocrats because of the way they are treated and their resentment eventually lead to uprisings against the dictators in order to improve upon their destitute state of …show more content…
Both lesser factions in Red Queen and Lakota Woman demonstrate that if a minority is exploited long enough, they will rise up to try to end the tyranny and try to gain followers to their cause. In Red Queen, the Reds’ freedom is crushed repeatedly to the point where the Reds could no longer serve under such oppressive rulers and rebel in order to gain back freedom and equality. The same can be said about AIM in Lakota Woman, as they rallied and fought in order to be seen as peers to the whites and to have some freedoms. Both rebellious groups from each novel used media to gain support and cast a wider net for their statements. As they went along, their causes got bigger with more followers until they could no longer be ignored. Overall, both insurgent groups from Red Queen and Lakota Woman proved that minorities rise up against majorities, made big statements for freedom and equality and gained a big following through
The different settlers in America had continued to down women as a gender, and make males more superior. As Perdue continues, she addresses how the power that Cherokee women held had began to plummet the more they were involved with Europeans. However, today there are still Cherokee women that stand strong, hold positions of power, and even are still respected as if it was the 18th
Many colored individuals were forced into slavery and each and everyone of the slaves had a different experience with their master. The slaves were treated as if they were nothing, a piece of property that the white people owned. They were not allowed to learn how to read or write; only needed to know how to do their chores and understand what their master was saying. They were just an extra hand in the house that had no say or existed in the white people world. The slaves’ job was to obey their master or mistress at all times, do their chores and take the beating if given one.
[Title Here, up to 12 Words, on One to Two Lines] Hist223 Short Paper Professor Rozick 6/1/2017 Abstract The Aztec and Lakota tribes were all some type of Indians. Even though they were both Indian tribes and shared similarities, they also shared different beliefs on things such as religion, history of creation, animal life, and daily practices. The Aztecs were indigenous to Central America, where the Lakota tribes lived in the northern plains of North America. In this paper, we will explore some similarities and differences between these two tribes.
They fought against the intersectionalities that had been set by society based on their gender. In the First
Typical Native American and African society was often matrilineal. This meant that familial relationships were divided through the maternal line, rather than the paternal one like in Europe. This provided women in these societies a great more power and authority than it did in Europe. Women often were involved in making and influencing decision making in the tribe or group. To Europeans, this type of gender egalitarianism was not just foreign but also considered savage.
Women’s Suffrage Reaction Paper The declaration of independence states that all men and women are created equal. This document, along with the constitution, is what the administration of the United States was founded on. The men who created these documents were citizens striving for equal rights and representation in government. Ironically, these rights the founding fathers worked so hard to create for themselves were not granted to women in their newly established nation.
American actress Estelle Parsons once said, “It is so important to get respect for what you do and at the same time give it;” respect is also one of the twelve virtues of the Lakota Nation. Respect is one of the revered and more important values that Native Americans still live by today. Because they hold a significant place in Lakota society, special respect is to be given to elders. Both children and adults must give respect to others to be able to receive respect. When you show respect, it shows that you were raised properly.
Cherokee society was not some savage like the first European settlers liked to pretend. The people were very connected through their religious beliefs and by living in close knit communities. The Cherokee people knew what was expected of them in their communities, but also knew what they could do to improve their status. In this way their lifestyle was very organized. Men and women had their own roles in day to day life, not because one gender was inferior, but because it was what they believed they were meant to do.
On both sides, there is a person of power who is ethnocentric. This individual has the power to make decisions for a large number of people and other followers do not question their word. For the natives this individual is Neehatin, he believes that the black robes are stupid and a danger to the community. Also that they are demons who cause trouble and only talk about death. Neehatin feels Laforgue’s presence in the tribe is a danger to them all.
Since the time of colonialism, Blacks and Indigenous peoples fell under the totalitarian ruling of colonists who have obviously favored their own race over others in order to expand their political, territorial and economic powers. As a result, the non-whites (notably the Blacks and Indians) were unjustly segregated and classified as inferior to the
Known for being an abolitionist and one of the most important African American leaders of the nineteenth century, Frederick Douglass once said, “The thing that worse than rebellion is the thing that causes rebellion.” Instances of rebellion orchestrated by groups of people can be traced from our earliest records of history all the way to today’s modern era. People in a society gather together and form a rebellion against whom they believe to be the oppressor. Using both violent and nonviolent tactics, these social groups continue to rebel until they achieve their goal of gaining some prosperity or desired success. The Ku Klux Klan and the anti-war protests of 1960s are two examples of social groups, that rebelled against their oppressor.
In Life Among the Piutes, sarah winnemucca hopkins describes what happens when soldiers came to their reservation based off what white settlers tell the government. The most shocking instance of this happened when Winnemucca encountered a group of soldier who told her the white settlers accused the natives of stealing cattle, “the soldiers rode up to their [meaning the Piute’s] encampment and fired into it, and killed almost all the people that were there… after the soldiers had killed but all bur some little children and babies… the soldiers took them too… and set the camp on fire and threw them into the flames to see them burned alive”(78). This is an abhorrent act that is unthinkable in a functioning society. The natives had done nothing but want to hold some shred of land from the settlers who had taken everything from them and are exterminated like vermin. This was something that stayed hidden from many white settlers because of its barbarism and by exposing it Winnemucca truly educates the reader, past and present, on how natives are
In all the different tribes, none of the women are seen as less than the men, however in European culture at the time, the women were seen as weak and lesser beings. Gunn Allen tackles this issue using ethos logos and pathos by appealing to the readers through logic, emotion and her personal experiences. With Ethos Gunn Allen makes herself a credible source by mentioning that she is a “half breed American Indian woman. ”(83) making her story worth paying attention to rather than if it were a story by an outsider who truly has nothing to do with the American Indian women.
The racial division in this story between black and white people which stemmed from the master-slave relationship
Key elements in this perspective are that society is structured in ways to benefit a few at the expense of the majority, and factors such as race, class, and age are linked to social inequality. To a social conflict theorist, it is all about dominant group