William Shakespeare, in his play Julius Caesar, cleverly criticizes the British people and politics using his characters to resemble and represent real Brits. No one is spared from these representations. In Julius Caesar, he point out the flaws throughout the class ranks from the commoners to Queen Elizabeth. Shakespeare uses the Plebeians in Julius Caesar to point out what he identifies as flaws in the common British people. He depicts the Plebeians as being easily influenced and controlled by those in power, preventing them from gaining power themselves or raising their social class. The situation of the Plebeians is directly comparable to the control the monarchy had on the common British people. Similarly, Shakespeare uses the conspirators …show more content…
Shakespeare includes this passage to show the audience that, while it might seem like a great thing, too much power can corrupt the mind and inevitably lead to our downfall. Shakespeare’s Caesar is a perfect embodiment of this philosophy, for Caesar has gained so much power and wealth that he now believes that he is the superior to everyone. In this scene, Caesar basically says that there are other stars in the sky (meaning other people), but that he is the “Northern Star” and therefore, he is the brightest and most powerful; and ultimately, that he is the only one who has the right to rule Rome. The audience in Shakespeare's time would have noticed this arrogance and how it lead to Caesar’s death. However, they may also have realized that Shakespeare also added this scene to show similarities to Queen Elizabeth and make a prediction of her assassination. The idea that Caesar is used to represent Queen Elizabeth is also supported by E.A.J Hongimann who in his essay “Politics, Rhetoric, and Will-Power in Julius Caesar” states, “Queen Elizabeth suppressed the old faith tudor system with herself as the head of church and state and Caesar threatened the old republicanism, replacing it with a new form of government, which he headed as perpetual dictator” (Hongimann). In this quote Hongimann shows that Caesar and Queen Elizabeth are also similar in their style of rule. Both of them believed in reforming the civilizations that they ruled to get rid of the old and replace with the new. For example, in Julius Caesar, Caesar is trying to become a ruler for life as a King which would have drastically changed the way the Roman Republic was operating. In these ways, it is evident that Shakespeare uses his interpretation of Caesar to point fingers at and represent Queen
Introduction Sometimes it doesn’t matter how bad someone may be, they just have to be better than their competition. In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, the central conflict lies with Julius Caesar. People like Cassius viewed Julius as an up and coming tyrant so he wanted him dead. He convinced Brutus and few other to people help him kill Caesar.
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare is about the assassination of Julius Caesar. The conspirators against Caesar recruit Brutus, who had great influence over the people of Rome and was trusted by Caesar. With his help they attack Caesar in the senate. At his funeral Mark Antony, a friend of Caesar's, is aloud to speak and he is able to turn the people against the conspirators. This causes a Civil war between Rome and the conspirators.
The plebeians were hopeful that Pompey would fight for their rights and political power but instead he was a supporter of the privilege aristocrats. However he bribed the plebs with gift, festivals and money in order to gain their support, another form a
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar was written about four hundred years ago. This story demonstrates the corruption of Roman government in 44 BC. Rhetoric and theatrics are the main tools that current politicians, and ancient politicians use to gain popularity, commandeer power, and make crucial relationships. Important Roman political figures such as Brutus, Cassius, Antony, and Caesar along with present-day politicians use these rhetorical methods to accomplish their goals. The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare demonstrates how rhetoric and theatrics largely affect politics and political relationships.
Although Caesar, as the upcoming ruler of Rome in Julius Caesar, should be portrayed as the ideal leader of the play, he actually has too arrogant of a character to be so. Therefore, Shakespeare places honor in Brutus and allows Brutus to have the role of the idealistic leader of the story. Although Shakespeare writes this play in a controversial time period during England’s political turmoil, he allows the audience to be able to choose the true ruler of loyalty to the crown or the honor of a noble man through the understanding of the two contrasting character
Since Caesar had defeated Pompey, a military and political leader during the Roman Republic, in battle and was a roman general at the time, Caesar went on to conquer and take control of Gaul ( modern day France) and allied himself with Cleopatra in Egypt by marrying her. Caesar was expecting to become dictator for life because of his accomplishments without the Senate voting on him. This shows that Caesar wanted anything that would better him in life and brings us to the next topic about how Caesar didn’t think about others first. This shows that Caesar wanted anything that would better him in life.
William Shakespeare wrote Julius Caesar to show how he began his legacy and how he died. Although William Shakespeare wrote about Caesar, he wrote Julius Caesar to show how people are followers that don’t usually make our own opinions but instead listen to any person that is high in power or important. Therefore, people are simple-minded and when trying to put the mind to something on our own we give up because it was difficult. Shakespeare also teaches the reader what it really means to be human.
Brutus, Cassius and Mark Antony were aware of the fact that if the plebeians sided with them, they would hold all the power. Yet the plebeians were still ignorant of this fact. Although, they were unable to recognize the potential in their ability to unify. The possibilities that their unification could portray were endless
Shakespeare is not the only playwright who is interested in Roman political problems, there is a tragedy by anonymous titled “ The Tragedy of Claudius Tiberius Nero, Romes Greatest Tyrant”, the play demonstrates the circle of ruling by tyrants made Rome a horrible place to live. However, in Coriolanus, despite the despair, Shakespeare expresses his concern differently. Not only because Republic already taken form in ancient Rome, but he understands the humanity as it is, he Portrays the limitation of individuals, and limitation of the time. There are no alternations for Coriolanus, nor for any other characters in the play. Shakespeare unfolds the inevitable consequence that people fail to solve realistic political problems if they decide to
Sicinius and Brutus are two tribunes elected by the plebeians, and scheme their ways through their positions. Sicinius and Brutus exploit Coriolanus, and push the plebeians to believe that Coriolanus is a bad leader, a tyrant. Eventually, the two tribunes effectively persuade the plebeians to believe that Coriolanus is not giving them the voice they deserve and voted for. For example, Sicinius states, “Sir, the people must have their voices; neither will they bate one jot of ceremony,” (2.2.138-139). This allows Sicinius and Brutus to begin the rebellion against Coriolanus, and ultimately succeed in getting him exiled from Rome.
Julius Caesar Zakary Powers Julius Caesar, leader of Rome, had a overwhelming ego and it is shown many times throughout the play of, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar”. One of the times Julius Caesar showed his overwhelming ego was towards the beginning of the play when the soothsayer warns Caesar about the “ides of march”. The second time Julius shows his ego is when he says that he is not afraid of anybody - and people may talk behind his back, but never to his face as they would be too scared. The third time Julius shows his ego when he ignores his wife’s caution and worries about going to the Senate. Julius Caesar overall is seen to be arrogant and he has a very large ego.
In public, Caesar was the leader Rome had always wished for, a strong, valliant man that would let nothing in his way. Consequently, Caesar had a more vulnerable side to him where the reader would be able to see glimpses of throughout the play. Still, Caesar allowed his public self image to take priority in which would eventually lead to his death. Speaking historically, the great Julius Caesar was a people’s leader with a deep hunger for power in which he would do anything to
(No Fear Shakespeare act 3 scene 1). This scene shows that the conspirators are using themselves to flattery Caesar and give false honor to him, so they will be closer to him and kill
The play begins with Julius Caesar returning from a victory over Pompey to a cheering crowd of Romans. He is an ambitious leader who wants Rome to prosper and looks out for his countrymen over himself, though he has his own, darker, flaws. This selflessness is explicitly demonstrated by him saying “What touches us shall be last served” (III.I.9) when he is told to deal with a letter because it most directly related to him. His goal is to further Rome and gain the approval of his people, which he does very well.
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a tragedy, William Shakespeare creates facades for the historical figures he uses as characters. Although the audience knows the disguises for most characters, they have no choice but to watch them fail. The decline of powerful politicians makes this play a tragedy. In order to remain strong to the citizens of Rome and their enemies, Cassius, Caesar and Antony put up facades to mask their motives.