Julius Caesar a play by William Shakespeare depicting the tragedy of the historic death of the famous ruler of Rome which the work is named after. The author uses a combination of Logos, Pathos, and Ethos to capture the reader's attention and emotions throughout the story. However, these rhetorical references are most prevalent during the speeches of Brutus and Mark Antony to the commoners at Caesar’s funeral. The speakers use these strategies to attempt to gain the people's support their cause. The winner of this debate is Antony who draws a revolution together to battle the conspirators that killed his dear Caesar. He does this by using stronger and more examples of these literary tools. The first and arguably most impactful of these tools …show more content…
Early on in his speech, Antony proclaims, “he was my friend, faithful and just to me.” The word “friend” gives the audience belief that if anyone would know about Caesar being ambitious, as Brutus accused, it would have been Antony. This was the first shot the Antony took at the credibility of his opponent. The second attack on his reliability was made with the words, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome / Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill” (III.ii.91). Mark Antony speaks about the personal accomplishments of Brutus to give a little credit to his opponent while also boosting his own through the roof. This is the result because it makes Mark Antony seem unbiased in the situation. Shakespeare also uses ethos in the last sentence of the passage when Antony requests, “My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, / And I must pause till it come back to me.” In this line, Mark Antony shows outward mourning, in doing so lowering himself to the level of the crowd. This puts himself on the same level as the people giving them a more easily relatable and agreeable leader. Through these three examples of ethos, Mark Antony gains the people’s trust allowing him to propose his revolution plan with little
This allows him to connect with the people and make them feel like he is just as equal as they are (Schoolworkhelper). Both of them use good tactics, but Antony understands that the common people are easily persuaded and if he uses emotion he will be able to sway them to his side and want to riot against the
In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Marc Antony’s funeral speech for Caesar’s death is more successful than Brutus’ funeral speech because Antony uses verbal irony and pathos instead of gravitas or logos. In his speech, Brutus uses gravitas or honor while Marc Antony knows the general will of the Plebeians. Antony uses verbal irony in his speech, whereas Brutus uses a straightforward, 1-dimensional rhetoric. Lastly, Brutus uses logos in his speech, while Antony uses pathos to win over the Plebeians. In the end, Antony’s use of verbal irony and pathos in his speech is more effective in winning over the Plebeians to avenge Caesar’s death than that of Brutus.’
Julius Caesar, dictator of the Roman empire, is dead. In William Shakespears Julius Caesar, Caesar was assassinated by the conspirators at a meeting as a strike against the power Caesar held over Rome. At his funeral ceramony Brutus allowed Mark Antony to say some words to the people of Rome. However, in agreeing to this, Brutus put himself in danger as Antony was able to prusaude the crowd against Brutus using the great phisopher, Aristotles, persuasion techniques. Aristotle created Ethos, pathos, and logos to help with persuasion in literature.
After Caesar was murdered people were happy but, all of them were turned against those who had murdered Caesar; this was all possible by the use of rhetoric. Antony’s hands were tied so, he used the only thing he had left, words. Antony was told that he was not allowed to praise Caesar and, that he was there to only talk and nothing else. Antony managed to get the crowd to notice that what Brutus and his conspirators had done was not justified. Antony was able to perfectly able get the crowd to realize that Caesar was a good man who did everything to help the people.
In Marcus Brutus’s speech, he establishes credibility for the audience using the ethos appeal. In the first part of the speech Brutus acknowledges his honour, “... believe me for mine honour, and have respect to mine honour, that you may believe…” (3.2.Brutus). He also tells the audience that he has “the same dagger for (himself)” that he used to killed Caesar to kill himself whenever “it shall please (his) country”(3.2.Brutus). Brutus’s goal by saying this in his speech is to make the people believe that he killed Caesar because he is an honourable man willing to do anything for the good of Rome even killing himself. But on the other hand, Mark Antony has a larger effect on the audience with his credibility techniques.
Antony wants to remind the Romans that he is credible for speaking of Caesar “that love my friend, and that they know full well, that gave me public leave to speak of him” (III.ii.215-216) Antony uses ethos after telling the Romans everything to convince them in being against that conspirators’ that he can speak of Caesar because he was a close friend of Caesar. Antony convinces the Romans to retribute the conspirators’ for what they have done “In every wound of Caesar that should move the stones of Rome to rise and mutiny” (III.ii.225-226) Antony wants revenge and is convincing the Romans to riot by using pathos. Antony wants the Romans to feel sorry about Caesar’s death “here was a Caesar! When comes such another?”
Brutus says Caesar is ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man, but was Caesar really that ambitious? The speaker, Marc Antony, is trying to convince all the people of Rome into liking him more than the people that killed Caesar. Marc Antony uses many rhetorical analysis tactics to do this. In Marc Antony’s speech, he uses forms of rhetorical analysis, such as pathos, ethos, and logos, to help persuade the people of Rome to go against his conspirators. At the start of his speech, Marc Antony begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen lend me your ears."
After reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.
Both Brutus and Antony must convince the people that Caesar's death was not their fault to ensure that the anger of Caesar's death doesn’t turn to them. Brutus, a friend of Caesar, attempts to convince the people that Caesar's death was merely for their good. Meanwhile, Antony attempts to avenge Caesar's death by spotlighting his nobleness and kindness to the people of Rome. The ideas of rhetoric eventually led to the death of a ruler. Antony made the
When people get confused some see a color changing monkey, some act in violence, and others may ask questions of the speaker. This is kinda similar to the play Julius Caesar in that there are two speeches said by Brutus and Antony. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, three of the main characters are Julius Caesar, Brutus and Mark Antony. Caesar wants to be king, but Brutus doesn’t think he would make a good king.
By praising Caesar in disguise using verbal irony, Antony tries to get his audience to turn against Brutus and the conspirators. The way Shakespeare wrote the speech was to express the tone and diction. The way Mark Antony
Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, encompasses many themes, speeches, and poetry devices that help to further the characters in the play. Leading up to Antony’s riveting speech in act III, scene ii, lines 103-143 to his fellow Roman friends, Brutus and the conspirators committed a horrible crime: the murder of Julius Caesar. This act of taking a life completely changed the way Antony thought. Now that Caesar no longer lives, Antony realized that in order to get revenge, he needed to convince the Roman people that Brutus and his conspirators executed a heinous act. As Antony’s speech occurred toward the middle of the plot, the audience of the play knew an abundance of information about each character.
William Shakespeare is the greatest playwright of all time. In Julius Caesar a play written by Shakespeare himself; he proves his worth of the title. The two most notable speeches in Julius Caesar are spoken by Brutus and Antony. They use many literary elements to persuade the audience of their point. In Brutus’ speech, he expresses the point that Caesar died for the good of Rome.
Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar
Antony keeps reinforcing himself by providing examples of Caesar not being ambitious and asking the crowd rhetorical questions regarding Caesar's ambition. The people then get persuaded that Caesar wasn’t ambitious, and start swaying away from Brutus’s side towards Antony’s side because they now believe he is