On the night of March 5, 1770, the streets of Boston became a battleground, forever marking an important event in American history, the Boston Massacre. Bloodshed and turmoil ensued, leaving behind a legacy that would be examined and reinterpreted for decades, revealing the deep levels of historical significance and societal viewpoint. This research paper explores the intricate dynamics of how initial responses, shifting perspectives, and media depictions have shaped the understanding of this pivotal event. By examining the varied narratives and perspectives from the colonial era to the present, as well as the impact of media representations, we can gain deeper insights into the complexities and historical significance of the Boston Massacre. …show more content…
Seeking to downplay the severity of the event, they portrayed it as a tragic incident resulting from mob aggression. Accounts published in newspapers like the London Chronicle in April 1770 depicted the soldiers as acting in self-defense. According to one such account, the soldiers were "compelled to act in their own defense against the seditious and violent mob" (The Boston Massacre Historical Society). These narratives aimed to justify the actions of the British soldiers and shift the blame onto the colonists, thus shaping a different perspective on the …show more content…
Visual representations, such as Paul Revere's engraving, "The Bloody Massacre Perpetrated in King Street," had a profound impact on how the event was perceived. Revere's engraving depicted a chaotic scene with British soldiers firing into an unarmed crowd, reinforcing the colonists' perspective of a deliberate massacre. The image circulated widely and stirred public outrage, solidifying the colonists' perception of the event (The Library of Congress's collection on John Adams and the Boston Massacre Trial of 1770). The power of visual representation in shaping historical memory is evident in how Revere's engraving influenced public opinion and perpetuated a particular narrative of the Boston
Paul Revere’s “The Bloody Massacre in King-Street, March 5, 1770.” is a painting of the Boston Massacre that still represents the bloody event today. However, is this depiction an observation of oppression or propaganda with a platform? The painting depicts the British Red Coats firing on the civilians of Boston as if it were a battlefield with the citizens pleading for mercy. On the contrary, according to History.com, “A squad of British soldiers, come to support a sentry who was being pressed by a heckling, snowballing crowd, let loose a volley of shots. Three persons were killed immediately and two died later of their wounds; among the victims was Crispus Attucks, a man of black or Indian parentage.”
View the image by Paul Revere about the Boston Massacre. If you were a historian, how would you criticize this version of the conflict? What evidence is there to support it? If I were a historian viewing this image in conjunction with our text, I would call this version of the conflict Patriot Propaganda.
On the evening of March 5th, 1770 on the cold streets of Boston, a group of British soldiers gunned down a crowd gathered in protest. What started as a group of young men harassing a guard would quickly escalate into what would later be referred to as the Boston Massacre as well as serve as fuel for the growing anger of the colonists towards Britain. This paper will analyze two accounts of this event. One is of a civilian observer by the name of William Wyatt whose account, while short, is to the point. The other is that of Captain Thomas Preston, the commanding officer of the soldiers involved who gives a much more dramatic description of the event.
In the early 1760’s, the tension between the people in Boston and the British soldiers started to grow until in early 1770, when the two groups reached their breaking point. On March 5, 1770, a group of men started intimidating a British soldier; he soon called for assistance but eventually the crowd had grown to practically one hundred people. Captain Thomas Preston and seven other soldiers arrived, trying to calm the situation down, but to no avail. A soldier fired into the crowd followed by the other soldiers firing soon after, resulting in five people being killed. Captain Thomas Preston happened to be arrested and charged with murder.
In two famous engravings of the Boston Massacre, Engraving of the Boston Massacre by Paul Revere and The Fruits of Arbitrary Power by Henry Pelham, viewers are given different views of the same event through the use of various artistic techniques. If one looks closer at these two engravings, it becomes apparent that there are differences between how two groups, American Colonists and British Troops, are presented as good, evil, or morally ambiguous. Through the use of various artistic techniques such as color, shading, facial expressions, and text, Revere and Pelham were able to achieve two different expressions and opinions of the same massacre. While Pelham’s engraving appears more neutral in tone, Revere’s engraving includes much more emotional appeal and
T. Hewes ' account of the Boston Massacre tells the tale of how the towns people were treated prior to this event. He talks about the treatment of the soldiers towards the colonists. They did many things that were advantageous and not fair. One incident he discusses is when an apprentice is not paid for the work that his master has called him to do for a soldier. This incident coupled with the numerous things that have happened during that time, incited the people and caused them to want to protest more vehemently.
Paul Revere creates an elaborate print titled “The Bloody Massacre perpetrated in King Street”. The Sons of Liberty use the incident as a powerful piece of propaganda .British troops were withdrawn from the city and several British soldiers are put on trial for murder. Sam Adams insists that the soldiers be tried for murder. John Adams defends the seven soldiers, but John Adams argued that “emotions cannot override facts” and that the soldiers acted in self-defense.
The Boston Massacre was not called ‘The Boston Massacre’ at first. The original name, was in fact the ‘State Street Massacre’. Another name they had called it was the ‘Bloody Massacre on King Street,’ and Paul Revere was the one who had originally called it the ‘Bloody Massacre on King Street.’ Paul Revere, William Dawes, and Samuel Prescott all played a major role in The Boston Massacre. Paul Revere went down in History as the one to ride his horse around the Boston and warn people the British were coming.
Propaganda also played an important role in the process of mass hysteria. In Paul Revere’s famous engraving of the Boston Massacre, he depicts the British soldiers, also known as redcoats, shooting the helpless colonists (The Boston Massacre Engraving). This engraving became one of the most popular ones known throughout history because at the time, most colonists were illiterate and this image helped them to understand what happened. Mass hysteria was incorporated into both propaganda and crowd action, and this was only the beginning of the colonists’
Not all memories are exclusively for the person who lived them, but many can be used to guide future generations. Likewise, in a much different period, William L. Champney captures a dark time in our nationâ s history with his portrait called â Boston Massacre.â The painting illustrates what will
Townspeople are calling it a battle for liberty (The Boston Massacre). The etching posted in town square seems farfetched. Why would the soldiers purposely fire into a crowd without good reason? Pastor Weston was in Boston during the massacre. He said that Patriots were in a drunken stupor protesting near the Customs House about the resent increase of soldiers and the newly implemented Townshend acts in Boston.
Now, who is to blame for this incident? Well, the British Soldiers are to blame for the Boston Massacre because they didn’t hear things clearly and they reacted with violence rapidly. The British soldiers are to blame for the Boston Massacre because they didn’t listen carefully and shot immediately after they thought the captain said to
The Boston Massacre Trial It’s March 6, 1770 and tension between the American colonists and the British is palpable. The night before British troops shot and killed five Americans and injured another six during a fight at the Boston Customs House. Colonist Paul Revere claims it as the, “Boston Massacre”. Captain Thomas Preston and his soldiers are on trial for the deaths of the five colonists.
The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.
Three weeks later, Paul Revere’s engraving “The Bloody Massacre in King-Street” could arguably be the most effective piece of war propaganda in the entire history of America. However, it is not accurately