In the 1800’s, America was eager to expand their territory further west. An example of this in history is the Mexican-American war of 1846. In hopes to prevent the United States expansion into Mexican territory, Mexico allowed Americans to settle in the Tejas region. The Americans abused this privilege so they fought for independence. The Americans won and Texas remained its own country for nine years before the United States wanted to annex Texas. This introduced the issue of territorial boundaries and the two countries fought over a disputed piece of land between the Rio Grande River and the Nueces River. Although The United States could be justified in going to war with Mexico because of manifest destiny, the United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico because they were responsible for provoking the Mexican army and the United States only wanted more land for the expansion of slavery. …show more content…
Document C states that from Mexico’s point of view, the advancement of United States troops was an attack in itself towards Mexico. This document clearly expresses that the Mexican government felt threatened by the American occupation in the Rio Grande river. James Polk sent in American troops trying to get a reaction from Mexico. This was an organized plan to get the approval from congress to declare war on Mexico. How could the war have been justified if America purposely sent troops to the disputed territory to induce a fight? This proves how the United States was conclusively unjustified with going to war with
Was it right for the US to go into war with Mexico? In 1846 Mexico and the United States went into war for many different reasons. In 1821, Mexico had declared their independence from Spain, this ultimately was probably not the best decision. In 1844, James K. Polk was elected president and was a strong supporter of the Manifest Destiny. The war between the United States and Mexico was unjustified.
Ruandy Salazar Per. 3 “Was the United States Justified in Going into War With Mexico” No one really knows why the war with Mexico started and who’s fault it is, but I think the U.S. started it by pushing Mexico to its limits. In 1821 Mexico declared freedom, and later Texas declared independence in 1836.
A Mexican citizen living at the time period of the Mexican American war said “they have at last invaded our territory, and shed the blood of our fellow-citizens on our own soil”. Polk declared in his speech that the Mexicans had attacked first, killing US citizens on US territory. Polk wasn’t lying, but since the land the first battle started on was the disputed area, Polk had no right to say the Mexicans wanted war by attacking them on their soil. This makes the Congress under Polk’s influence unjustified of declaring war on
The United States war with Mexico was over 160 years ago and still continues to be a divisive and widely debated topic, was it justifiable or not? The first war to be fought mostly on foreign land, was the Mexican-American War that started in 1846. America, lead by President Polk, who believed the U.S had a “manifest destiny”, fought against Mexico who had a weak military and was politically divided. After the war ended in 1848, Mexico lost one-third of its territory which included present-day California, Utah, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico. Although the United States war against Mexico resulted in the gaining of America’s most valuable land, the war itself was unjust because their goal was to expand slavery, Texas was wrong from the beginning, and the war was based on false pretenses.
The Mexican War between the U.S. and Mexico has expanded the borders of the U.S. and shrunk the country of Mexico. Till this day there is still debate if the U.S. was justified in going to war with Mexico. Now, There are many reasons why the U.S was not justified in going to war with a young and growing Mexico such as, Polk wanted to start a war, falsely advertising events that soon led up to the war, and how Mexico let Americans on their land to help the young country out. these claims are proved by new sources that have come to light instead of the stories the American history books teach kids in schools.
The Mexican-American War The contentious Mexican-American War is a topic that is frequently discussed and debated. Was America's decision to go to war with Mexico justified? The Mexican-American War, which occurred from April 1846 to February 1848, was a clash between the United States and Mexico. It resulted in the U.S. obtaining more than 500,000 square miles (1,300,000 square km) of Mexican land spanning westward from the Rio Grande to the Pacific Ocean.
The Mexican-American war was a conflict between the United States and Mexico that began in 1846 and ended in 1848. The war was a result of a dispute over the U.S. annexation of Texas and the Mexican government's refusal to recognize the Rio Grande as the southern boundary of the United States. The war resulted in a U.S. victory and the signing of the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which allowed the U.S. to acquire large swaths of Mexican territory, including the modern-day state of California, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Utah, and parts of Colorado, Wyoming, and Oklahoma. Despite the U.S. victory, the war was not justified and was a violation of Mexico's sovereignty. The first reason why the Mexican-American war was not justified is that it was based on pretenses.
While describing that America was purposefully sending troops into the disputed war which greatly increased the chances of a war to begin, the author states,”In early 1846, on Polk's orders] the troops commanded by General Zachary Taylor arrived at the Rio Grande, across from the city of Matamoros, thus occupying the territory in dispute and increasing the possibilities of a confrontation.... ”This proves that the Mexican American war wasn’t justified because AMerica was sending troops to try and start conflict in the territory. This is important because AMerica was deliberately trying to start conflict by being in the disputed war. While describing that Mexico believed America was going to try and attack so they responded by protecting their land and country from the invaders, the author states,“In the eyes of the [Mexican] government, the mobilization of the US army was an outright attack on Mexico.... As a consequence, the Mexican government reaffirmed the instruction to protect the border, meaning the territory located between the Rio Grande and the Nueces River - an order which led to the battles of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma....
INTRODUCTION Throughout the 1840s and 1850s a major war happened called the Mexican American War which drastically changed the U.S. and Mexico and lead to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo to be signed and which established the Rio Grande and not the Nueces River as the U.S Border. This also lead to the U.S. annexation of Texas and lead to the Mexico agreeing to sell California and the rest of the territory for 15 million. So you 're probably wondering why the war was fought but you 'll find that out later.
This war happened mainly because the U.S. wanted to expand to the Pacific Ocean to fulfill their Manifest Destiny, trying to take away Mexico’s land. Mexico refused to to give land to the U.S. The big question is whether the U.S. was justified in fighting Mexico in the Mexican-American War. The United States was justified in going to war with Mexico because Manifest Destiny, too much Mexican interference, and Texas was invaded. One reason the Mexican War was justified was Manifest Destiny. In Document A, John O’Sullivan writes: “Texas is now ours...Let their reception into the “family be frank, kindly, and cheerful….”
Thirdly, a second reason the Mexican War was not justified because US soldiers were in a disputed area. According to Jesus Velasco Marquez from “A Mexican Viewpoint on the War With the United States,” he states that “From Mexico’s point of view, the annexation of Texas to the United States was inadmissible for both legal and security reasons.” As well as, “The American government acted like a bandit who came upon a
God wanted the US to expand. On the contrary, some individuals claim the US was not justified in going to war with Mexico. This point of view makes sense because Texas was Mexico’s to begin with. Despite that, Texas was independent when the US annexed it. Therefore, the united states was justified in going to war with Mexico.
The United States of America has been through many wars, wars concerning many things such as land oil, pride and respect. However, when the United States went to war with Mexico, it was planned over greed. The Mexican- American war was a war provoked by the United States, in efforts to expand the coasts of the country. Mexico was a small underprivileged country who had previously to the war had already lost part of their country (Texas). Needless to say this war was cut throat and violent, it was however one of the smartest business decisions America has ever made.
The Mexican-American War changed the Unites States of America in a monumental way. This war changed The U.S.A.’s relationship with foreign powers and the economic standpoint of the nation. The Mexican- American war, and its strong ties to manifest destiny, shaped the nation in a country bordered by two seas with a chance for common folk and foreigners to have a sustainable life due to the gold rush. The war can also be accounted for the downfall leading to the Civil War over the conflict of slavery due to the land purchased in the wars treaty. Conflict between Mexico and the United States began when Texas, previously part of Mexico, became part of the United States.
The United States war with Mexico continues to be a divisive topic among many people because of its background. The Mexican-American war was a fight between Mexico and America for land. America’s belief at the time was Manifest Destiny, which meant that they believed that America should extend from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific ocean. In the end, America benefited from the war and got the land. The United States expanded its size, achieving their dream of Manifest Destiny.