The pebble Mine in Alaska has some pros and a lot of cons for the world if the mine was approved by the government. The pros are economically rich in minerals for devices and purposes. The cons list the disruptions of nature and the people who live off the land.
The pros are economic benefit. The only legitimate reason on why the Pebble Mine will do any good is because of the copper and gold itself. It will make the price of copper and gold decline and give more use to electronic devices, jewelry, and other important things. It will also give the economy profit. Those are the only reasons that state why Pebbles Mine will benefit anything.
The bad things that would happen way overcome any of the good things that would happen if the mine was given permission by the government. Some of the problems would be economical, cultural, and environmental. The Bristol Bay Fishing Industry caught about one hundred fifty million dollars worth of sockeye salmon and was still drowning in fish. People have been fishing in Bristol Bay for thousands of years. The fishing corporations employ thousands of people every year which benefits the people by putting money in their pocket, food on the table, and also helps the government. Tourism in Bristol Bay brings millions of dollars each year. And if the mine gets the
…show more content…
And so have their ancestors. The tradition of them living off of the fish will be gone. Alaska has very clean water and that is why it is very rich in wildlife. If the Pebble Mine is approved, acid drainage will occur and leave the crystal clean water polluted with many bad chemicals. The chemicals ruin the salmon's sense of smell which will kill them. It will leave them vulnerable. They will not be able to sense predators or prey. If they can not sense their predators, they will be attached more easily. And if they can not sense their prey, they will go more
The money was used for city to make more towns. Which is used for more people. Which gave a giant increase to yuma county. Another positive impact on yuma from the project. When the gold rush happen they put yuma on the map.
Many fish, have died because of this but logging isn’t the only problem. Brown makes another point that the wild salmon could probably make a comeback on their own, even with the logging and dams damaging their habitat, they wont be able to “rebuild [their population] if not enough fish return from the ocean to spawn.” The salmon have been majorly overfished because there was really no limit
Likewise, There seems to be a higher number of negative effects this proposal would have then is does positives. A small number of these include; a loss of ecosystem, a decline in tourism, environment and water pollution, and
Sure it’s nice for people to consider the well being of the fish, but sometimes we have to ask ourselves if what we are doing is really worth it and how it will affect us in the long run. I am pretty sure these 1 billion dollars can go towards something more useful than the San Joaquin River Restoration
For example, when the textile mills were created, it was greatly beneficial to everyone in different ways. This caused textile mills to be built more, but the problem was that it depended on water because that was the source of energy. In result of this,
With the owners releasing them it causes the snakes to live out on their own so they eat wild animal and start to wipe out the animals species. Aswell they could feed on humans
They would not hurt someone without a reason. They loved to be petted and loved on. They also know when to be aggressive. They know when they need to stand up and protect their loved ones. But just like they love to keep their owners safe, they are also very loyal to their owner.
One specific example of this has to do with the proposed mining in northern Minnesota. Polymet, a large mining company, has proposed a big nickel and copper mine, but first they must meet extremely strict requirements and acquire many approvals. Much of the concern has to do with water contamination. If there is any way that processes from the mining cause water contamination, then the mining will not be approved. The protection of Minnesota geology is extremely important, especially water.
They are used to an environment where they could explore. So, when they are placed in an setting that is small and no room to explore then they become bored and “are less active than those housed in larger outdoor enclosures” (Mallupur 2005). These details can ensure psychological and physical problems. According to the article, Self-Injuries Behavior in Zoo Primates, frustration associated with environmental events can lead to self-injuries behaviors. These self-injuries consist of over-grooming, hair-pulling and biting themselves repeatedly.
Mining can damage the environment and structures above ground. “The observable biological effects include: (1) depletion of numbers of sensitive, and diversity of all, free swimming and benthic (bottom dwelling) aquatic organisms;(2) loss of spawning gravel for fish; and (3) direct fish mortalities, particularly of natural game (salmon and trout) fish.” (Hester, Harrison, 1994). So much is destroyed by mining. Countless properties and families lose their homes and livelihoods to weakened soil and polluted environment.
Not only did the Gold Rush help with the Bay Area it also helped the national economy as a whole because many companies from the East invested into businesses. Also several individuals like Levis Strauss struck it rich not by mining but by creating things that miners would
In addition, there are more downsides to fracking than just water pollution, and that is the pollution of our environment. The condition of our environment is horrendous when fracking is conducted. To add on to that statement, fracking has caused natural gas leakage into the air, marred landscapes, and many more hazards to our environment. Fracking has already caused pollution to the air, and fracking companies have to remove trees, then that takes away more air from our environment. Trees are vital to Earth’s supply of oxygen, and these companies are just taking the air straight out of the lungs of the people.
“The Sacred Headwaters is a subalpine basin in northern British Columbia, Canada” (Wikipedia). The Sacred Headwater is ecologically important for several reasons. To begin with, the region has three wild salmon rivers. It also contains many other wild species such as grizzly bears and stone sheep (Wikipedia). More importantly, “The Sacred Headwaters is rich in mineral and energy resources, particularly coal and coalbed methane”(Wikipedia).
There are many pros and cons for living in Chaco Canyon. Some cons in Chaco canyon is poor sanitation, some cities have people who live in proximity or environments which can cause disease infections. Another con is that some people faced social problems like dense population, class systems, and strong centralized government which caused stress. Also another con is warfare, some cities were fortified, and soldiers assisted to defend their state. Cahokia also has its pros and cons that people seek while living there.
Our natural resources are at risk every time fracking occurs. Fracking needs to be banned since it is hurting our health and that it drains our natural and limited resources required for us to sustain life. Water is an essential to living and it is a need. Without it we would be dead from the dehydration. Fracking in this case can contaminate it to where we cannot drink it and if we do it can lead to death or a trip to the hospital: