Today’s generation will have to find other means to help support themselves in retirement if Social Security funding runs dry. The uncertainty of where the money will come from to sustain the fund, further adds to the problem. According to the Social Security Administration, approximately 59 million people collected Social Security Benefits in 2015, but as the population swells that number is expected to grow to approximately 100 million by the mid 2030’s. Government officials need to step in and act quickly to solve the issue of funding, but opposing viewpoints keep it at a standstill. Retiring using Social Security will be a thing of the past without proper reform, due to funding issues caused by longer life spans and political gridlock. …show more content…
After an amendment in 1940 to include survivors’ benefits, disability benefits, health care benefits and cost of living raises, monthly payments were started. Ida May Fuller, of Ludlow, Vermont was the first recipient of monthly payments in the amount of $22.54. Since its inception Social Security was looked at as a stable, reliable, income for everyone as they approached their retirement years. However, the Social Security program of today faces many problems and while there is no perfect solution, there are things that can be done by our politicians to ensure the continuation of America’s retirement …show more content…
“Legislators from both major parties talk about reform, but refuse to do anything substantial -- if they did, they would be voted out of office since reform would likely mean benefit cuts or higher taxes.” (Badertscher) Social Security needs reform and it has had it in the past. Since its inception there have been steady changes to the program to ensure its sustainability and continuation. However fixing the problems that arose usually ended up causing new ones to form. The National Commission on Social Security Reform, also known as the Greenspan Commission, was created in 1983 to ensure these problems were seen to. However, movement is slow and some politicians are reluctant to changes in the system. “Critics of the Bush plan believe that the current system will be able to continue distributing the same level of benefits until 2075, if the economy continues to grow as it has historically.” (Wilson) Republicans are pushing to cut benefits; lower payments mean less revenue that needs to be brought in. Democrats push to expand benefits, they believe in a retirement for all people and want to avoid cuts in benefits in any way possible. “The consensus among Democrats has gone beyond opposition to benefit cuts. Now they stand almost united in favor of expanding Social Security.” (Biggs) While both sides argue which
More than 40 years ago a pension was the best form of assurance for a financially happy life after retiring. In 2016, the Central States Pension Fund forecasted that it will run out of money in the near future. To potentially stop the fund from running out of money, it has proposed cuts to current and future pension payments. These cuts will affect not only thousands of workers, but could affect millions. As the director of the Central States Pension Fund it would be best to push for cuts on pension payments.
The data, as reported by the Bureau of Census in 2012, is in agreement with the trend stated above. According to the study, roughly 9.1% of geriatrics live in poverty, whereas 21.8% of 18-64 year olds live in poverty (2012 census figure 5). In the past five decades, the rate of poverty in those 65+ has decreased a massive 26.1%. The favorable consequences of Medicare are undeniable and amidst the concern for the elderly, there was a growing awareness regarding civil rights issues of the
Roderick Karami History 118 Professor Bowerman November 16, 2015 Mid Term / Essay Number Two . The Great Depression in the United states started October 29, 1929 also known as “Black Tuesday” which was when the American stock market which was doing very well ended up crashing, causing the country into its biggest economic fall to this day. President Franklin Roosevelt took over office in 1933, he acted immediately to stabilize the economy and provide jobs to those that were in need. Upon the next eight years the government experienced programs relatively known as the New Deal that aimed to restore the economy.
Before the New Deal, many conservatives often found the idea of social security to be frowned upon because of the misuse of hard working tax money going to waste. This was a significant change because throughout the great depression, the federal government was not heavily relied on for support within the workforce until after the New Deal programs were put into effect. In times of need,
This is portrayed through the ways social security shifted burdens from the family to the
The biggest reason for the development of social insurance was the need for economic security in a modern society. After the Great Depression President Franklin Roosevelt created the “First New Deal” which was for relief and recovering the direct impacts of the Great Depression. The “Second New Deal” was the period of reform to introduce longer lasting changes for the
Cite your source. Ben Carson believes that the age at which social security is received should be increased. He argues that our life expectancies have increased and so the age at what you receive social security should be older. We should pay fewer years of social security to each individual, instead of them being on it for a long period of time. Carson recommends that this change be done over a long period of time.
This paper will explore the long term impact of the Social Security Act of 1935. The Act was created by the Roosevelt administration. Roosevelt believed that the provision for the public was a matter of justice, and not a matter of charity. Although a social security bill was introduced on January 17, 1935, the act did not emerge. The existing federal and state aid and old-age pension laws formed a national policy of social security.
Democrats support progressive taxation and simultaneously promote policies that benefit low to middle income Americans. Additionally, Democrats believe in encouraging the creation of jobs, investing in clean energy, and supporting small businesses. Similar to their view on economics, both parties have their own corresponding perspectives on Social Security. Many Republicans back having more personal control over their Social Security, as well as the idea of privatization. While some Republicans support the reform of Social Security, others seek reform so as to support the platform’s future evolution.
until the passage of the Social Security Act of 1935 which is what I will discuss next (Pimpare, 2007, pp. 237). Social Security Act of 1935 The Social Security Act of 1935 is sometimes identified as the birth of the American welfare state (Pimpare, 2007, pp.237). The Social Security Act of 1935 provided for unemployment insurance, old-age insurance, and welfare programs (Martin & Weaver, 2005, pp.1). The welfare part of the Social Security Act of 1935 provided programs that included Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) which has been transformed into the current program of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) (Martin & Weaver, 2005, pp.2).
Christopher, Greed was differently the driving factor of the imbalance between the wealthy and the common people. Social Security definitely did help the economy. When those of age 65 and over would retire, it would lead to job positions opening up, which led to new people being hired. It wasn’t really new demand, as younger people would replace the older ones. When people would receive their pension check it wasn’t very much.
As a society we need to accept that it is up to our generation to fix this issue. Reforming Social Security will benefit everyone living in the U.S. in the long run. Restoring Social Security to its once former glory is a necessity to benefit our further generations and to create a better future for the next generation of workers. In order to accomplish this lofty goal I propose that we increase the payroll tax cap to boost Social Security’s funding and reduce benefits for the higher income earners who do not need Social Security as much as others do. The majority of Social Security’s income originates from the Social Security payroll tax.
Another con to replacing Social Security is that gives the person responsibility of having to make a retirement plan and being able to make investment. Many people are not capable of such decisions and many will be taking an investment risk. I support replacing Social Security with private funds because as I mentioned earlier “instead of sixteen workers paying in for every beneficiary, right now it 's only about three workers” (Reno) for social security to function to its full potential the ratio would have to be sixteen to one but the number is much less than that its only three to one and the ratio will only continue to fall. As baby boomers begin to retire it is causing the social security system to face difficulties since the baby boomers generation will be a big number of people retiring that the working class will not be able to support them (Reznik, Shoffner,
How and where would those dependent on the social security system get the money they need to provide for their household? The smaller the monthly checks get, the less happy people will be and they will also slowly but surely become closer to poverty, leading to a system failing to achieve what it was made to prevent from happening. Another reason is that instead of opting in and relying on the social security system, there are other ways to live comfortably once retirement comes around, for example simply raising and saving the money through income, as well as utilizing the 401k. Investing in the 401k is completely optional and voluntary, whereas paying for social security is a requirement for all legal citizens living in the United States.
Thus, if this projected trend remains unresolved, the whole system may collapse as there will come a time where benefits and spendings will outweigh the