I like most the idea of Locke, It consisted that all the humans had rights. Which they were the right to life, liberty and property. He also believes in government with a limit of power and that was accepted by all citizens. And ending with his idea we can see he has something clear "if a government fails it obligations or violates human natural life."I like most this idea because in my personal opinion if this idea could work, in this countries that aren't in good moment including Honduras everything would be different. I will relate this with Honduras if people had their rights and specially If this governments had a limited power because they don't have it because they abuse of it it will ben a great country. But also I like this idea because it complete because it include from the government to the citizen. What this idea talk about the citizens is that those governors that will have "limited power" …show more content…
Because this idea is all the contrary of Locke's idea. Because basically Hobbes thinks in a powerful government and not in the citizen. Most of people do not think in the part that the people chose the governors, and that they need no make all for the citizens. They think only of them and not of the same people that chose them. They forget about their rights obviously according to Hobbes idea they do not have a limited of power as the idea of Locke. In my opinion this idea wouldn't work Locke, John Locke was born in August 29 1632, and died on October 28 1704 in United Kingdom. He had a more optimistic optimistic of human nature his view. In his idea of the enlightenment it says they everybody had certain rights which they are, right to life, right to property, right to liberty. He argued that people formed governments to protect their natural rights. So his idea was based that the best type of government has limited power and was accepted by the citizens. In less words Locke rejected the thing of
John Locke’s major philosophies included the Social Contract and the Second Treatises of Government which influenced the Constitution of the United States. John Locke expressed his ideas on human nature and government in his famous Social Contract and The Second Treatise of Government which greatly influenced James Madison to write The Constitution of the United States. According to, (What life would be like in a “State of Nature”,2017), John Locke had no doubt that the State of Nature has a law in which everyone must follow. Those fundamental rights consist of the right to life, liberty, and property. Human Nature results in individuals living without government, which allowed Locke to believe life without government will provoke violence
John Locke stated the ideas of the rights that people should have: life, liberty and the right to own property. He believed that governments should be there to protect those rights and should be overthrown if they did not do so. John Locke's ideas were spread through the early American colonies. During the revolution there was a paper written and handed out called Common Sense, that put his ideas out there again for the colonies. It expressed that the people were wrongfully being treated.
For example Locke, argued that people should be allowed to choose their own government, as it will have a greater chance of not failing. Locke said, “The people are at liberty to provide for themselves, by erecting a new legislative,... for the society can never,... lose the native and original right it has to preserve itself, which can only be a done by a settled legislative and a fair and impartial execution of the laws made by it” (Document A). John is stating that it shouldn't be the government who makes all the decisions but the people as it is their right to do so. John Locke was just one of the four figures in the enlightenment that made an impact.
John Locke, a great philosopher, made a great contribution to the Enlightenment ideology for both society and government. His ideas were contradictory to the ideas of Hobbes. Since, they were complete opposites. Locke believed that human nature was good while Hobbes believed that human nature was bad. Hobbes argued that his idea was right, and that for people to escape that horrible way of living, they had to give their rights away to a strong absolute leader or ruler and in return they got law and order.
Locke insisted, “that government was originally formed for the purpose of protecting man 's individual rights against the incursions of other individuals” (Sigler, 1998, para.1). Locke’s ideas on revolution supported the American Revolutionary war and his views of man’s natural rights shape our democratic government which are still relevant today. John Locke’s famous writing Two Treaties of Government claimed that all men have certain natural rights. Men have the right to be free and equal which went against the early rule of the monarchy. He believed some of our rights have to be given up in order to form a government that would protect every man but if the government failed or selfishly used
Locke’s ideas from the Two Treatises of Government and An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, were based upon the natural rights where power comes from the people. Both of his pieces contributed to revolutions, most importantly the American Revolution as power from monarchies was removed and democracies were created. Allowed for limited government power and all obligations were to the citizens. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding basis was on how the knowledge existence of God, certain moral truths, and laws of logic or mathematics pertained to the natural rights of
Whereas Hobbes states that based on his idea of human nature, which is humans are born evil, that one ruler should be given absolute power. While Hobbes makes various points he does conclude that people should surrender their freedom to this power because the ruler keeps them safe. This including the right to complain about the ruler’s policies. Locke’s ideal government is one that doesn’t give absolute power to one person but rather power to a group of power. This making it less likely for a ruler to abuse their power or corrupt the government.
John Locke was a philosopher and political scientist. He had many interests and produced a number of writings that influenced future leaders. One of these leaders was Thomas Jefferson, who was involved with the aid of America and the act gaining independence from Britain. The Declaration of Independence and Locke’s views on government contain many similar aspects. These ideas includes the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (natural rights); the protection that is provided by the government for these rights; and the altering or abolishment of government if it fails to provide and protect the rights of the people.
During the seventeenth and eighteenth century, there was a change in the thought process of mankind. Two prominent and opposing viewpoints came in the form of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Thomas Hobbes was a man who influenced society’s thoughts on government. John Locke, on the other hand, had a heavy and lasting influence in the shaping of modern politics, the nature of individual rights, and the views on human nature. Hobbes and Locke both derived two states of nature that though they had some similarities were polar opposites.
Locke is a founder of the Common Sense pamphlet. He believed in government ruled by people. “He expressed the radical view that government is morally obliged to serve people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property. He explained the principle of checks and balances to limit government power. He favored representative government and a rule of law.
Biography Profile John Locke John Locke was a philosopher who believed that every human learned by experience, and wasn’t born with basic ideas about the universe. He also believed that the power of government came from the people, not the divine rule of a king or God. He thought that every person was born with rights to liberty, property, and life. He thought that people also had a right to revolt against their ruler if they failed to protect those rights. John was born in 1632 in Washington.
Most of Locke’s theory is implied in the Declaration of Independence. The Declaration of the Rights of Man was in favor of both theories. The American Revolution came
Locke’s idea proposed the natural rights, which are life, liberty, and property. He stated this for people to set up civil government to protect their natural rights. Similar to what Locke proposed, the declaration used a comparable statement when it said, “The aim of all political association is the preservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, security and resistance to oppression.” Another Enlightenment thinker is Voltaire.
In his book entitled Leviathan, Hobbes expounded on his firm belief in the necessity and efficacy of an absolutist government. Hobbes believed that people were naturally "quarrelsome and turbulent," and that in order to maintain a lawful and peaceful society, they gave over their freedom to a ruler with unlimited sovereignty. His principal reasoning was that any questioning of governmental actions would provide an opening for ensuing chaos.
Locke’s assumptions that humans are rational and led by reason, and the abundance of resources allowing private ownership of land, give a higher purpose to the government in a society than just physical security. Government, on all its levels, is protecting individuals’ property and creating and enforcing laws that will apply to everyone, even the sovereign. The “levels” of government embody a new idea proposed by Locke – the separation of powers. He argues that in order for the government not to be corrupt, it has to have separated legislative, executive and juridical powers which operate independently from each other’s influences. Therefore, he directly opposes Hobbes’ argument for absolute power: an absolute monarchy would be worse than the State of Nature since the sovereign holds the whole power of the people and now it is impossible to defeat him as an individual, which would not be the case in the State of Nature where everyone was equal.