Push and Pull of the Union In the 1800s, the Union was split on many issues. One of the foremost of these issues was the allowance of slavery. There were many events that kept the Union together and tore it apart, from the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 to the Kansas-Nebraska Act and Lincoln’s election. One of the most crucial events that kept the Union together was the creation of the Missouri Compromise. According to McNamara, “The Missouri Compromise was the first of the major compromises of the 19th century intended to ease regional tensions over the issue of slavery… accomplished it immediate goal.” In the 1800s, the issues of slavery divided the nation. The North wanted no part of a nation that undertook in slavery because …show more content…
This act allowed for the joining of Kansas and Nebraska to the Union, as well as letting them choose whether they would support slavery or not. One of the effects of this compromise was that it dissolved the Missouri Compromise. Because Kansas, which became a slave state, was North of the Missouri Compromise Line it broke apart the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union together for a few years. Also, the Act led to a civil war between pro and anti slavery people in Kansas. When Kansas was still undecided on the issue of slavery, Missouri hoped for it to become a slave state. Soon after, Missouri sent 1,700 men to Kansas to vote for a pro-slavery representative. These men were called Border Ruffians, and they threatened to shoot, burn, and hang those who were opposed to slavery. When it came time to vote for a territorial legislator, almost 5,000 men from Missouri came to elect a pro-slavery legislature. Even though the majority of the legal voters in Kansas were anti-slavery, they were outvoted by the fraudulent Missourians. This legislature soon created a harsh slave code, which angered both the North and many residents of Kansas. Soon after, some people from Kansas drew up their own constitution and organized their own government, which the North supported. Later, 800 men from Kansas and Missouri rode to the antislavery stronghold in Lawrence …show more content…
Lincoln was against slavery, and he “argued against the spread of slavery” (history.org). When he ran for president, the Southerners were afraid that he would attempt to end slavery, and they did not even include him on the ballot. Also, they stated that they would secede from the nation if Lincoln became president. When Lincoln was elected, “...seven states had seceded, and the Confederate States of America had been formally established…” (history.org). Lincoln’s election was the breaking point of tensions between the North and South, and when he was elected the outcome was the secession of the South. One month after the secession, the Civil War was started. President Lincoln’s election tore apart the nation because the South left the Union as a direct result of his election. It was one of the main causes of the Civil War, and also physically split the Nation into two
Leading up to the compromise, tensions between supporters of slavery and those against were very high. This feud reached a climax in 1819 after Missouri requested admission into America as a slave state. This did not go over well with many
Congress has always played a pivotal role in addressing the social and economic issues of the United States. This legislation has shaped the US’s economic and political situations as well as affecting the public sentiment of America’s society. Two specific pieces of legislation passed during the course of the US’s history that have had significant impacts on slavery and sectionalism have been the Missouri Compromise (1820) and the Fugitive Slave Act (1850). Both legislative pieces have roots stemming from the theory of manifest destiny and the country’s desire to expand itself.
How the Missouri Compromise made political conditions worse: The Missouri Compromise… The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to remove sectional and political rivalries between the North and the South. The North was provoked by the authorization of Missouri becoming a slave state by the South in 1819.
The Missouri Compromise however had effects larger than simply distributing the land. The Missouri Compromise would further prevent a larger conflict between the north, and south in the immediate future. This made both sides even more restless to fight for their respective causes. The compromise
The Missouri Compromise was a solution to the issue of the difference in slave states and Free states. Missouri desired to become a slave state; however with the addition of Alabama this would upset the balance with twelve slave states and only eleven Free states. Conflict arose, as according to the article, “The slaveholding states claimed that Northerners were trying to end slavery”. The compromise was solved by a clever solution by Henry Clay. Missouri would be allowed to enter as a slave state, as desired, and Maine would be brought into the Union as a Free State, causing an equal twelve to twelve ratio of slave to Free states.
“Almost 5,000 pro-slavery voters crossed the border from Missouri, voted in Kansas, and returned home” (TB) Due to the amount of people for pro-slavery, the state became in favor for slavery. In addition, slavery and antislavery groups argued in what became “Bleeding” Kansas. A committee formed to discuss the issues between the two
The Missouri Compromise came as a two part solution to the admission problem. First, Missouri gained admission to the Union as a slave state, with a provision that portions of
The Missouri Compromise was definite attempt by the government to shove the issue out of view. By the time the Missouri Compromise was introduced, a few northern states were already in the process of abolishing slavery, as was England. The government was finally recognizing the cruelties of slavery but did not want to anger the southern plantation owners. Thus, they created the Missouri Compromise in order to ease their guilt and face the least contempt. The Missouri Compromise was only able to increase the brewing conflict of slavery between northern states and southern states.
Southerners—Democrats and Whigs alike—jumped at the opportunity to open Northern territories to slavery, but Northerners recoiled, outraged that the Missouri Compromise had been violated. Riots and protests against the Kansas-Nebraska Act erupted in Northern cities. What Douglas had failed to realize was that most Northerners regarded the Missouri Compromise to be almost sacred. The publication of Uncle Tom’s Cabin and the brutal enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act had by this time awakened hundreds of thousands in the North to the horrors of slavery.
By the 1800s Westward expansion had been transpiring significantly in the United States with the gaining of new territories through prominent occurrences including the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican-American War. As new states were admitted into the union the imperative issue of slavery expansion arose as the states would have to decide if the new additions would utilize the institution of slavery. The preservation of the balance maintained between the number of slave states and free states was prevalent in constituting resolutions to the slavery issues. The issue of slavery expansion in the western territories repeatedly emerged, provoking conflict between Northerners and Southerners because of the balance of power shared between the northern, free states and the southern, slave states. Both sides feared one would become superior and, therefore, oppress the beliefs and abilities of the other side.
Regional Differences in the 1800s The Election of 1800 realigned America with Jefferson’s Republican platform after a continuous stretch of Federalist control. Although he was an advocate for states’ rights, his saying, “We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists,” reflected an equally strong desire to unite the country, despite internal political divisions. Jefferson’s acquisition of the Louisiana Territory greatly extended the borders of the nation, a clear invitation for settlers to look west. The implications of such movement showed no pity for the indigenous people and further forced Indians beyond the limits of their native lands.
Throughout the United States history, particularly during the mid 1770s to the 1960s, tension erupted in regards to slavery between the Northern and Southern states. Both states were evolving into their own distinct society. The Northern states were rapidly expanding in successful industrial developments, foreign trade, and commerce banking. At the same time, the Southern states were swiftly expanding in agriculture, were growing dependent on the production of cotton and enslaved African Americans. Additionally, numerous western territories were being acquired and as a result the Southern states wanted to expand slavery into the western territories but the Northern states opposed the expansion of slavery creating conflict.
Kansas entering the union as a slave state would upset the balance the Missouri Compromise had set. This act was a temporary fix to a problem that would exist for years to come. This act proves that slavery dominated political life of the South. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of five bills passed by Congress regarding confrontation about free and slave states over territories acquired by America after the Mexican-American war. The compromise created stronger fugitive slave laws.
‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .
However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.