Amekeco Brooks Jr. The 2016 election was driven by the fear, nostalgia, and bias of the American people, but was it rigged? The President-elect, Donald Trump, felt the election was rigged against him. That idea is nothing more than a baseless theory of Mr. Trump. To rig an election would be no easy task and mistakes are rarely made. To impersonate a registered voter and using a dead persons vote is very unlikely, and even less likely to sway one. Lastly, the bias of the media cannot be counted as a way of rigging elections and it has always been a factor. When a person claims the election is rigged they usually talk about rigging the machines and voter fraud, but those things are very unlikely. Benjamin Franklin said, “Three can keep a secret, …show more content…
Media and its bias has been a factor in every election and is not necessarily a way to rig it. Trump feels the media is targeting him, but in truth an outlet always chooses candidates to pick on. He is not the only one. John Oliver`s “Last Week Tonight” had an entire segment about his running mates Jill Stein and Gary Johnson and made fun of them. On the matter of Saturday Night Live (SNL) they have always made fun of celebrities and government officials alike. SNL has even been known to mock Hillary in the past and even during the election. Trump seems to be the only candidate angry about this, while the other candidates seem to have little to say about the medias less than nice jokes about them. The media also targets those that they feel are bullies (for lack of a better word) and Trump displays himself as one that needs to be put in their place. Over the course of the election, he has displayed himself as a man from another time, a time of prominent racist and sexist ideals. Trump just makes himself out to be a target and an easy one with all that he says, how can any media outlet not target that? The fact of the matter is that most outlets choose to put down Trump and support Hillary because at least she is trying to set some kind of example while he acts like a child from the 1860`s. He claims that the media is bullying him as if he himself is not one. He acts like they are making up stories, when they have evidence. The media has an impact on the election, that much is true but it is not a way to rig an election. All they do is put out facts in an entertaining way to get numbers and maybe advocate for a candidate. The media displays the candidates the way they present themselves and people make choices based on what is said and what they see, just like a campaign, but free. It is all up to the candidates on how
Watching this year’s election was shocking. Against all predictions, against every analysis, Donald Trump became the president-elect of the United States. But were those predictions really off? As the LA Times put it,” Hillary Clinton got roughly the same number of votes that President Obama received four years ago en route to his reelection, but she nonetheless lost the presidency to Donald Trump, who came in at least 2.8 million votes behind her.” This is, of course, because of the electoral college.
This was proven otherwise in the stolen election of 2000, in which Bush won the candidacy by the 25 Florida electoral votes. This outcome did not serve as an effective system for modern presidency. It makes American’s question whether or not their vote actually counts, in comparison to the votes of the electors they choose to represent their states. If someone who wins the popular vote of the people but not of the electoral loses how exactly does this allow the people to feel comfortable about making a difference with their own vote when the ultimate decision is not left up to them but the Electoral
Without a doubt, most people know about the elections that had taken place only a couple of years ago. However, some people are unaware of what caused our current president to win. To put it simply, there is a system called the Electoral College that has been around ever since the U.S. Constitution was made, where certain people (electors) are selected in each state to vote for a candidate. However, it operates on a different scale than popular votes, where if a candidate gets the majority of electoral votes, they win the election, regardless of how many popular votes they earned. Obviously, this system has caused many conflicts within politics due to how it overrules the popular vote, essentially making it useless, and complicates presidential
The Electoral College has been around for many years and has proven to be a useful tool in voting for a president. However, as useful as it is, we must ask if it is still the most optimal option when voting for president now that we have electronic communication and can spread information like wildfire. The Electoral College is flawed and should be changed.
For example, Donald Trump is currently claiming that the whole election has been manipulated to go against him.
The United States Presidential election that took place in the year 2000 was between George Bush and Al Gore. The vote was very close and it ended up all coming down to Florida. Once the votes were counted and it was revealed that Bush had won, Gore wanted a recount of the votes. The matter was taken to the Florida supreme court and Gore ended up winning the case.
No political party can commit large-scale fraud in any one state to dramatically influence an election.” This means that the electoral college stops people from rigging the election, it only stays at a state level. If anyone frauds the election with the popular vote, it will show at a national level. Also, the less populous states would not have any say in the elections. What say would Wyoming’s 585,501 have against California’s 39.25 million?
Claims of “fake news” among mainstream media and independent sources are something that is getting the attention of everyone in the nation. This is causing a lot of people to talk about what they believe is actually going on with the media. In an article published on January 19, 2017, Bob Garfield addressed Trump on his claims about “fake news” in an aggressive manner and defending his career as a reputable journalist very strongly in the process. On February 27, 2017, Larry Atkins published an article responding to the claims Trump have been making about “fake news” and the media with a calmer approach. Garfield and Atkins both have their own way of appealing to their audience, Atkins article demonstrated a stronger and more logical approach
Joel Hale 1. In the first article it is stated that after Trump had won the election even though he had lost the popular vote, several angry Democrats and liberals were calling for the abolition of the Electoral College. The Electoral College was designed to prevent coastal elites from large states from getting to pick the president. People were furious that Clinton didn’t win, and millions of people in California, New York, and other states wrongly believed that their support would affect the outcome. A suggestion for moving forward is keeping the Electoral College, with some minor changes, and get rid of the popular vote.
In the 2016 presidential election Donald Trump, a generally unfavored Republican candidate, won presidency under the Electoral College. Democrat nominee, Hilary Clinton, on the other hand, won the popular vote—the vote that represents the actual votes of the citizens, not the electors of each state. Clinton won nearly 3 million more votes than Trump and lost the election because of the Electoral College. The George Bush v. Albert Gore Jr. 2000 presidential election results demonstrate the same outcome. Gore won the popular vote, but ultimately, Bush won the presidency because he won the Electoral College (Boxer, 2017).
The United States is a realm of democracy. We the people have the rights to choose and elect our leaders at the national, state, and local level. On the national level, our president is elected by the people of the United States. However, in a presidential election, our popular votes don’t go directly into the race. Instead, we use an indirect method to elect our president through the Electoral College.
According to Ralph Hanson (2017) “socialization is the process of integrating people within society through the transmission of values, social norms, and knowledge to new members of the group” (p. 38). As human beings, we are very observant of our surroundings and often base our actions off of what we recognize around us. From the skit, we can see that the writers and producers make it out so that Trump and the people around him are not the sharpest tools in the shed. This really gives a bad impression to the Republican Party as a whole. Though Trump is portrayed pretty accurately as an egotistical and self-centered person, the people that he affiliates with are very exaggerated.
To accommodate to that TV network start narrowcast. They focused one group of people and aired what they wanted to watch. This gave them a constant fan base even though it lost the other group. When people keep seeing what they want to see, it becomes very hard for them to agree with the views of the group. “If you have a steady diet of items form Fox News and The Drudge Report, your belief that Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen will be perfectly safe.”
Political ads are a way to persuade you to vote for one political party or the other. Every 4 years, there is an election between democrats and republicans that will help decide the next president of the United States. These campaigns between the democrats and the republicans are the strategies candidates use to win your vote. During the election season, there is many speeches made by both the people who are running for president. Debates between the two sides can sway your vote to one side or the other depending on what the candidates say.
When thinking of the media you think they are reporting the appropriate and accurate information not based on any personal opinions and feelings. Also one would not think the media would be reporting based on one side of politics or the other. The media is extremely biased when it comes to politics and news. While some of the media is conservative-biased I believe the mass media is liberal-biased. Majority of media outlets are liberal companies, media personnel and journalists will identify themselves as democrats and liberals more so than republicans or conservatives and lastly the left side (liberals) of the mass media is persuasive on what information to report.