On September 15, 1789, our Bill of Rights was added to the government of the United States of America. One of those rights was the right to keep and bear arms. “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution.) is our 2nd amendment. Some Americans and political parties believe that the 2nd amendment should be taken away because it endangers the lives of Americans. The American people should be allowed to bear arms because it provides safety of our country and ourselves.
In today’s world guns are used more than 2.5 million times a year in self-defense. Citizens who abide by the rules use their guns to defend themselves, their
…show more content…
If we would get rid of guns, that would trigger a whole new battle of crime to worry about. We would have to worry about the rape crime going up if Americans weren’t allowed to have guns. Today the world is not safe against anything, why take away the source of keeping this world semi safe. Our 2nd amendment wasn’t used for just the military. “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” I get were the critics think that the word militia means military, but that’s simply not true. The word militia means a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency. The concealed carry laws have been more popular in the last decade. A study in 1996 showed that states that allowed citizens to obtain a concealed weapon the murder rates in those states dropped 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by7%, and robbery by 3%. If those states that weren’t allowed to have concealed carry laws in 1992 there would be approximately 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults, and over 11,000 robberies would have happened if they didn’t have the laws. Vermont is one the top …show more content…
Representative Rick Becker introduced a bill on Friday, January 6 to allow people over the age of 21 to carry “any firearm or dangerous weapon concealed unless prohibited by law.” Right now North Dakota offers 2 classes of concealed weapon permits. Class 1 and class 2 are the current permits. People who are at least 21 years of age can receive the class 1 licenses. Citizens who are at least the age of 18 may obtain the class 2 permits. On February 21, two gun bills passed the House of Representatives. The permit less bill got through the house with an 83 yes and a 9 no vote. The school carry bill also passed through the house with a 73 yes and 19 no vote. The 2 bills will now go on to the senate for further consideration. As of March 21, 2017, the bill that will allow citizens to carry a firearm without a permit is heading to Governor Doug Burgum for his word on the bill. The North Dakota Senate passed the bill with a 34-13 vote. Right now, Governor Dough Burgum hasn’t even seen the bill at all, but that’s about to change. The number of concealed carry permits have doubled in the past 5 years to 49,000 people. Hopefully with this bill we as a state can make that number way higher than it is to keep our state safe from any crime. In North Dakota no one may have a machine gun unless he or she complies with the national fireamrs
“A well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. While maintaining a militia to protect the country, every colonist can own a gun for protection of themselves and their families. We want to ensure the basic right to bear arms we enjoyed as Englishmen remains because we were denied this right when we began to rise up against British authority in the colonies. It is important for us to be equally as armed as the government so we can rebel against the government if they overstep the boundaries in place by the Constitution. It is the right of the people to alter or abolish the government if it becomes
Debates about the Second Amendment have focused on its parameter to protect private rights of individual people to possess firearms, and the ability to be apart of militia organizations. The world has seen a drastic change since the implementation of the amendment in 1791. Civilian ran militias are almost obsolete, and most militias are now ran and regulated by state governments. The military of the United states has also seen a dramatic increase, and is undoubtedly more powerful. For the most part, civilians are no longer expected or desire to be apart of a militia, however firearms are still essential for self defence, hunting, and
As stated in the beginning, creating new gun control legislation would only further restrict the rights of citizens to carry a concealed weapon legally. The Virginia State Legislature needs to fund the enforcement of the current gun control laws. The State needs to provide more funding towards the Office of Public Safety and Homeland Security to give to the police departments so they may utilize that money to enforce the current laws. They may also improve on the Virginia Firearms Transaction Program to ensure that anyone with a background that might be considered to be dangerous will not be able to purchase any guns at that time. The more funding the State Legislature can provide the police forces, the more they can find ways to better the ways to maintain the current gun laws so Virginia can be a little bit
The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.
The second amendment states “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Us americans don't need to “bear arms.” Some may say that many people use them to hunt but there are many other weapons you can use to hunt with as well as protecting yourself from danger. By having the second amendment, it gives criminals the right to go out and harm people, whether it be a family member, friend, someone you walk past. Statistics say that “The U.S. has an estimated 283 million guns in civilian hands.
Many people hear or watch debates over any topic and one of the most common topics are over gun safety or gun control. Many people have over-heard or heard about state legislators and of lawmakers come up with this new law. The debate is over whether or not to allow an open-carry or have a carry-conceal permit if in the range of the age limit or over a certain age point to get that permit and to be allowed to carry a type of weapon. So if something does occur at that point there will be that privilege of being safe around strangers, and others that many are unaware about. Now that the debate is over men and women, should have the right to bear arms.
In the constitution it states, that its our right to bear arms. Were allowed to keep guns in our possession for fun or just protection. 59% of homes in america have a firearm which can be stolen from other people and soon your guns will become a part of illegal gun trafficking. When gun control laws came in affect gun crime spiked to 89% or 18 million cases for gun
For advocates of the second amendment, the right to bear arms applies to all Americans for self-protection against dangerous criminals. Criminals will always have access to weapons, therefore citizens need self-protection using firearms. John Lott, in “More Guns, Less Crime,” explains that crime fell by 10 percent in Texas in the year after a law had passed letting citizens carry weapons ( Martin 10). This evidence shows that if more citizens were armed for example, the citizens in Texas, less crime would occur in America. Although those in favor of the second amendment believe that arms are used in self-protection, they also believe it is an individual right and oppose strict gun control laws as
The right to own gun is a constitutional right that is guaranteed in the United States Constitution under the Bill of Rights. U.S. citizens have the right to bear arms. Americans keep guns in the house for very good reasons, that is to protect themselves from intruders and burglars or even for hunting. The weapon makes people feel more secure and at ease at night in the house. That sense of protection is why every household in America wants to own some source of weapon, especially a handgun.
The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual
The Second Amendment states that one has the right to bear arms. This right can be taken away from one when they do some sort of crime that goes against this and gets their right taken away from them. Around 3 million americans carry a gun with they all the time with a concealed weapons permit. That number is 20% out of the 15 million americans that have a concealed weapons permit. We should not get rid of the right to carry a concealed weapon though there are exceptions depending on the person and their history.
According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep
Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.
The thought of a society without a militia is sickening with terrorists being able to attack any helpless citizen. Sure, the alternative weapons are useful, yet they don 't have any range upon the enemy and some people can not acquire the physical force or tactical skill needed to fortify. Gun control makes it so only the fittest of the fittest survive, which means even more deaths when terrorists attack. To add, gun laws do not prove any use. Even though gun laws prevent deaths, they infringe so many rights in the immutable Bill of Rights, which is one of the foundations of the great United States.
Nevertheless, carrying a concealed gun should not be prohibited from certain places especially with everything going on in society today. The right to carry a concealed gun provides a sense of security, some type of protection if something were to happen. Anything can happen in the blank of an eye and having a concealed gun allows one to feel safe. The law bans concealed weapons carry in a lot of places that a lot of mass shootings occurred at.