White supremacists dominate the media today in both violent protests and accusatory remarks against the African American race. Racism regarding people of African descent has existed in this nation since it first began. Though we no longer enslave Africans or force African Americans into separate establishments in society apart from whites, racism is still a serious issue in this great nation that prides itself on being free and equal. In The Hanging of Thomas Jeremiah A Free Black Man’s Encounter with Liberty by J. William Harris, this theme of the white man and his contradictions regarding the law and social morals surrounding racism is ever present. In the case of Thomas Jeremiah, a free black man who owns property and slaves of his own is convicted of the crime of conspiring to begin a slave revolt against Charlestown …show more content…
Police brutality against African Americans is common on social media and many officers believed to have committed these acts walk freely with as little as a slap on the wrist so to speak. Thomas Jeremiah, was by general definition of what makes a great Englishman, on equal standings with a white man. He owned property, practiced Christian faith, and was a free man with a great reputation among white and black men alike. Yet, due to the pigmentation in his skin, any court trials in which he was convicted of a crime, he would be tried as a slave and therefore receive the most radical of punishments. The right to a trial by jury is also an American liberty this nation prides itself in. Many argued in Jeremiah’s time that rights such as the trial by jury fell to all men, black or white, while others adamantly refused that black men were considered worthy. These were only a few of the contradictions made by white men in which rights and laws were put in place, but the opposite was silently applied to the black
Fredrick Douglass, a free slave, wrote an article about a conflict in Boston involving a runaway slave and a kidnapper. The kidnapper attempted to return the runaway slave to his master; during a scuffle, the kidnapper was killed. Douglass penned that if society has the right to preserve itself even at the expense of the life of an aggressor then it was acceptable to kill the kidnapper. Society does have the right to preserve itself even at the expense of an aggressor’s life; therefore, it was acceptable to kill the kidnapper. In Douglass’s article, his argument is formatted to suggest two premises and a conclusion that are both correct and uncontested.
Although he hadn’t done so, there was no grant for leniency or release in his imprisonment; as his cellmate told him, “‘Don’t matter if you was or was’t All they gotta do is say you was’” (158). With the way this is mentioned in the book, the problem that most readily comes to mind is in regards to innocence. H had been jailed with no proof and no chance of discharge (bar a ten-dollar fine he was incapable of producing), worsened still by the fact that he was completely innocent of the crime he was accused of in the first place. It prompts the question of how frequently the convicted were innocent, or unfairly, disproportionately tried, but the greater issue lies in the use of the criminal justice system as a means to disproportionately target black people, both innocent and guilty, as a form of legal slave labor after slavery had been
So, in the absence of speedy official governmental justice, there was the spontaneous generation of what was called a “Vigilance Committee” or “Examination Committee.” Committees formed to be the judge and jury to mete out the punishment to both black and white citizens that worked to incite, plan, or support any form of insurrection within the counties. Responding to the fears, a planter-dominated vigilance committee rounded up slaves in the Second Creek neighborhood, where talk of a conspiracy first surfaced. Committee members believed that the slaves schemed not just to “kill their masters,” but to “ravish,” “ride” and “take the ladies for wives.” Ten slaves were hanged on Jacob Surget’s Cherry Grove plantation on September 24, 1861.
The United States, a nation founded on the beliefs of equality, upholds an inhumane enslavement of African Americans that opposes its values. In 1791, Benjamin Banneker, a free African American, sends a letter to Thomas Jefferson urging him to reconsider his stance on slavery. In an excerpt from his letter to Thomas Jefferson, Banneker’s personal criticisms of slavery are presented through the use of varied diction, knowledgeable allusions, and impelling appeals illuminating the hypocrisy of the United States’ institution of slavery and their foundations of equality. Banneker begins his letter (Lines 1-30) entreating Jefferson to reflect on the hardships he faced to achieve liberty. Banneker starts with “sir” and continually refers to Jefferson
Frederick Douglass's speech "What, to the Slave, is the Fourth of July" delivered in 1852 remains a powerful indictment of American history and culture. In his passionate address, Douglass criticizes various aspects of American practices and religions that perpetuate slavery and deny the basic rights and humanity of enslaved individuals. This essay explores the specific bases of Douglass's critique, examining the parts of American practices and religions he objects to and the reasons behind his objections. Moreover, it analyzes the enduring relevance of the speech's themes and messages for contemporary America, illustrating how the echoes of Douglass's words continue to resonate today. Frederick Douglass, an influential African American abolitionist, effectively highlights the stark contrast between the principles of freedom and equality enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and the reality of slavery in the United States.
Sean Kim Mr. Nguyen English 3H 12 November 2014 Frederick Douglass Essay All through American history, minority gatherings were casualties of American administrative strategies, and these approaches made them powerless against uncouth and uncaring treatment on account of white Americans. American subjugation is a telling case of an administration endorsed foundation that deceived and abused a race of individuals by instilling and empowering oppression, prejudice and misuse. This establishment is harmful to slaves and slave holders indistinguishable in light of the fact that American culture, particularly in the south, experienced a dehumanization transform keeping in mind the end goal to actualize the savage and heartless convention. In the
One black’s life was cruelly taken from him when he was put on trial for something he did not do. The reason, he was held guilty was because back then “when it’s a white man’s word against a black man’s word, the white man always wins. ”(Lee, 251-252) The white man’s word usually, got the jury to hold the black man guilty, whether the black man did it or not. After the trial, Atticus told Jem “If you had been on that jury, son, and eleven other boys like you, Tom would be a free man.
“Long, hot summers” of rioting arose and many supporters of the African American movement were assassinated. However, these movements that mused stay ingrained in America’s history and pave way for an issue that continues to be the center of
In the book To Kill a Mockingbird, we can see a clear example of injustice in the court. Equality is needed in all places no matter the person. People need to find a way to stop racism. Throughout time people have been put into slavery and have been neglected. There is injustice in this book because he is accused of someone else’s doing, is not given a fair hearing, and is attacked even though there was no evidence.
Both King and Douglass were advocating for the same thing: their constitutional sanction of freedom. Both men, in their respective letters touch upon parallel thoughts and beliefs that revolve around the much bigger topic of racial inequality and discrimination. Both men were discriminated against and they talk about their experiences and plight in their very distinctive yet special styles. Born in the year 1817, in an era of open and unashamed slave trade, Frederick Douglass’s story begins as a serf to Mrs. Hugh in the city of Maryland.
In America, the Declaration of Independence are similar to God’s covenant to Abraham, which promised Israel to Abraham and his children. The Declaration of Independence promises life, liberty, and happiness to every American citizen, yet the blacks face hardships when they ask for the fulfillment of their promised rights. The psalm Douglass chose to quote parallels to the situation of the blacks because both the blacks and the Israelites were denied something, by self-qualified superior, that was promised to them. The parallelism instates shame in the primarily Christian audience because their actions are comparable to the actions of a group of peoples who oppressed their religious predecessors. Next, Douglass’ repetition of “fellow citizens” illuminates Douglass’ belief that the blacks are not considered citizens in a catholic sense of the word.
In the book Atticus and the members of the court system express the reach of prejudice, justice, and fairness in the justice system. The justice system was filled with prejudice. In the book it states, “ Now don 't you be so confident, Mr. Jem I ain 't ever seen a jury decide in favor of a colored man over a white man…”(279). Reverend Sykes is witnessing the trial of Tom Robinson.
When arguing for racial equality, James Farmer Jr. quotes St.Augustine, “An unjust law is no law at all.” He claims that just laws are meant to protect all citizens; whereas, unjust laws that discriminate Negroes are not laws to be followed, thus raising awareness of racial discrimination by using emotional and logical appeals. In The Great Debaters, Henry Lowe appeals to the audience’s emotions during a debate about Negro integration into state universities. To challenge his opponent’s claim that the South isn 't ready to integrate Negroes into universities, he affirms that if change wasn’t forcefully brought upon the South, Negroes would “still be in chains,” which is an allusion to slavery. With this point, he is able to raise awareness of
Frederick Douglass, born a slave and later the most influential African American leader of the 1800s, addresses the hypocrisy of the US of maintaining slavery with its upheld ideals being freedom and independence on July 4th, 1852. Douglass builds his argument by using surprising contrasts, plain facts, and provocative antithesis. Introducing his subject, Douglass reminds his audience about the dark side of America for slaves, in sharp, surprising contrasts with the apparent progressivity within the nation. He first notices “the disparity,” that “the sunlight that brought life and healing to you, has brought stripes and deaths to me,” as an African-American former slave. It is surprising for the audience to hear that the Sun does not bring him any prosperity, that the Sun, the source of life on earth, brings him destruction.
Assuming all men are created equal like Jefferson said, then slaves should have never existed. Mr. Finch adds “ a jury is only as strong as the men that make it up.” Granted the men that make it up do not believe two men of different races are equal. Tom should be given a fair trail with an unbias jury. Assuming a white male was being accused of raping a black female, the case would have been dismissed as the female lying.