What is intelligence? Can true intelligence even be measured? The theory is that certain tests can measure such intelligence and intellectual achievement. Testing in education and physically, is an attempt to measure a person’s knowledge, or other characteristics in a systematic way. Also, teachers give test to find the certain abilities students possess and tell whether they have learned the subject (“Testing”181). Yet, the question is do these test always always show accurate results? Most tests are designed to measure one of several things which are learning achievement, learning ability, aptitude and interests. A test has been standardized after it has been used, revised, and used again until it shows consistent results. Although test …show more content…
These people see standardized testing as inaccurate and a false way of measuring academic achievement. That is only a few of the many things seen as cons for standardized testing. Along with that the tests fail to measure such important aspects such as creativity and critical thinking skills. Studies indicate that standardized tests reward superficial thinking and might discourage more interpretive thinking. Next, as a result of the small fragment of knowledge that is tested, standardized tests capture a incomplete picture of student achievement. Standardized test are not the same as student achievement, the scores don 't provide very much useful information for evaluating a student 's achievement, a teacher 's work ethic, or the success of a particular school or program. To make such judgements, you need to look beyond the scores themselves and make some inferences about what the real problem might be. The word "achievement" means more than a score on a test. Achievement includes class participation, students ' course-taking patterns, and teachers ' professional development patterns. Then, to assume that the test scores can take the place of all the other information we need to have a clear understanding of students ' development. Relying on standardized test gives us some poor conclusions about how our children are growing physically, emotionally, and intellectually. Even in …show more content…
People have to first understand what the definition of testing is to begin with. Next, how it is used and why there are different ways of doing. Along with that it is important to be clear on standardized testing and what it does. Then previous to seeing how it is today, the history of standardized testing is important to know. Such as how it came to be and what made it what it is today. Lastly, there are two sides to every story. Before you begin anything about standardized testing you have to look at both sides of its story. This includes the disadvantages and advantages of standardized testing. Such as why it is a unsuccessful way of assessing and why it is a successful way of assessing. Along with examples of how each side is proven either right or wrong. Finally, whether standardized testing is the best way to measure achievement or not, it does have a way of giving results that if improvement needed will be a major help for learning in the
: In my opinion, standardized testing is beneficial but also flawed. I agree they’re non-discriminatory because the content is equivalent for all students, but teachers are “teaching to the test,” leaving out additional learning opportunities. From experience, I believe the tests are
1. Standardized tests are a reliable and objective way to measure student achievement. Multiple choice tests like the ACT and SAT are graded by machines and not subject to bias or subjectivity. Having to rely on scores from teachers is not as reliable as the teachers have a vested interest in producing favorable results. 1.
Even Obama came out to say that, "learning is about so much more than filling in the right bubble" and that it "takes the joy out of teaching and learning". In other words, standardized testing doesn't belong in learning. Here are some reasons why.
There have been an increasing number of students who are misrepresented by a single score, yet academically succeed in college nonetheless. That is the primary reason why standardized tests should not be as highly regarded as other factors such as high-school GPA.
Standardized Testing hurts children who think in different ways. This is quoted by Valerie Strauss, who makes a great point by saying children can only learn by the way it 's taught and it cannot be learned from other sources. Standardized Testing limits what children can learn and how they learn. Schools also spend an extraordinary amount on testing that could be going to better education and more funding to arts and extracurricular activities. Although, some say standardized testing is beneficial to the way students learn, statistics show that this is simply not true, standardized testing adds unnecessary stress on students, suppresses their creativity, and limits the creativity of teachers.
Why We Should Kill Standardized Testing Standardized testing: the nightmare of every student’s school year. There are many problems with the state using standardized testing as a measure of a student’s success in the classroom. One of these reasons is that some students are just not good test-takers. People are still not realizing the problems with standardized testing, as in the US, all 50 states require students to take these tests. Standardized tests are not just a worry for students, they are also an inconvenience to teachers.
School’s are using standardized testing for the wrong reason. “A standardized test is any examination that’s administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner. There are two major kinds of standardized tests: aptitude tests and achievement tests” (Popham, 1999). The most common examples of aptitude tests are the SAT and the
Over two hundred parents claim to not let a student go through standardized testing. The earliest records of standardized testing come from China, for the subjects of philosophy and poetry. America “copied” the European education system. In the early 20th century, immigrants took “standardized tests”. To determine possible career and where each person stood socially.
Standardized testing is usually used to compare the performance of individuals in a relative manner. Many people consider standardized testing as an objective way of grading a student, however, it is evident
Standardized Tests are ineffective because they don’t measure what is important. Other people may think that we don’t take enough tests. The text stated, “We need a lot of tests to figure out how smart people are getting.” This all may be true, but, parents are complaining that the teachers are “teaching to the test”. Other people may think that we don’t take enough tests while some parents are complaining about all of the testings.
10). Those who come from different educational backgrounds or possess different learning styles require distinct approaches in teaching that a standardized gauge of knowledge does not allow. In addition to these inaccurate measurements, standardized testing does not provide useable information to teachers. Effective assessments should gather feedback that teachers can use to the benefit of students, such as insight into a student’s way of learning and thinking ("Standardized Testing Has Serious Limitations." para. 10).
Standardized testing criticises rather than what its purpose was, to teach students, and make them equal in learning. So instead of teaching students, standardized testing tends to criticise
Standardized Tests Hurts Our Kids Have you ever had to sit through a long boring test? Well, kids in the United States of America are forced in to take these long tests. These tests are supposed to measure children’s intelligence. These students face anxiety and stress over the length and difficulty of these tests. These tests do not promote learning in any way.
Standardized testing does not fairly consider the differences between students, they can cause anxiety for the students, and standardized tests lead to teachers changing lessons and teaching to the test because standardized tests are not the most beneficial option for students education and emotional health. Overall, Standardized testing has not improved students education and has caused many negative effects including greater stress levels among students, teachers cutting out important lessons and limiting students creativity, and the test are unfair because they are not made specifically for different: ethnicities, races, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Standardized tests have not caused an increase in the United States ranking in the world in fact the United States has gone down from 18th in the world in math to 31st since they have mandated them nationwide, So are these inaccurate unfair tests really worth the stress and educational suffering of America 's
Standardized testing does not require much of an effort. These tests are checked by the computer thus, saving more time and since these tests are administered in the same manner, it would be easier for them to evaluate the test results because these tests have its own standards. These tests are also objective and are based by general-knowledge thus, making the test results unbiased and non-subjective. Educators will also be able to compare and evaluate a student’s progress over a period of time. These tests would show whether a student has performed well or not (OccupyTheory, 2014).