Esmeralda, great post!
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an 1854 bill that ordered "famous sovereignty"– enabling pioneers of a domain to choose whether subjugation would be permitted inside another state's fringes. Proposed by Stephen A. Douglas– Abraham Lincoln's rival in the powerful Lincoln-Douglas debates– the bill toppled the Missouri Compromise's utilization of scope as the limit amongst slave and free an area. The contentions that emerged between master bondage and abolitionist subjection pioneers in the fallout of the demonstration's section prompted the time of brutality known as Bleeding Kansas and helped made ready for the American Civil War (1861-65). This 1854 bill to sort out western domains turned out to be a piece of the political
Douglas had expressed a distinct want for a transcontinental railroad. This railroad would connect Chicago directly to California, but many states were against the proposal. In spite of the benefits that the railroad would offer, the Southern States refused to have federal funds spent on a railroad that would pass strictly on territory that was closed to slavery. In an attempt to appease the Southern States, Douglas introduced the Nebraska Bill, also known as the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The act split the large area of Nebraska into two sections, Nebraska and Kansas.
The first instance of violence came when abolitionist newcomers, including the infamous New England Emigrant Aid Company, in Kentucky carried rifles nicknamed “Beecher’s Bibles” chanting comments like “Ho for Kansas” out to make both new territories free states. Southerners, at the time of the newcomers arrival, had thought there was an unspoken understanding that Kansas would become a slave state and Nebraska a free state raising new feelings of betrayal. Bullets between the two disagreeing groups began to be shot. The turning point of Bleeding Kansas, however, came in 1856 when proslavery raiders burned and shot up a free-soil town called Lawrence. These violent explosions largely contributed to the effects of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of
On October 16th the United States Supreme Court will hear the arguments concerning the Kansas V. Cheever cirme. Scott Cheever was convicted of murder and drug useage on January 19th 2009. Cheever killed Greenwood County sheriff Matthew Samuels at the residence of the Coopers in Hilltop, Kansas. Sheriff Samuels was going to the Cooper 's residence on a tip to arrest Cheever for illegal drug use, when he arrived he witnessed Cheever and the Cooper’s cooking and ingesting meth. Cheever was shooting at several other officers when they came to try and arrest him as well as try to rescue the injured Samuels.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was created to link the east and west coasts of America together to form the transcontinental railroad. America had growing interests in trading with Asian countries, and this railroad was the key. Throughout the 1850s America purchased over $10 million worth of land to build said railroad. After the Kansas-Nebraska act passed, Kansas became the center of attention. Due to building tension between the abolitionists and the pro-slavery parties Kansas turned into a very violent place.
The Kansas-Nebraska act is the fairest written law ever created. The state should have the right to slavery as was the rest of the country. Slaves were well-fed, they created exceptionally wealth and most families owned only 2 to 4 slaves. First off, slaves were well fed. This can be seen on page 212 of the "new perspective on slavery" packet.
Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 Throughout the ideas of sectionalism within the Northern and Southern states, The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 has caused a division within borders, paved the way for the issue of slavery to increase, and the result of Bleeding Kansas. The issue between the borders had to be resolved, as to the decision of Kansas becoming a free or slave state. President Abraham Lincoln spoke out against the idea, “Lincoln laid out his objections to the Act and resurrected his political career in a brilliant speech at Peoria on October 16, 1854”. (Monroe, R.D.) Lincoln also wondered how it was morally right to treat people based off of popular vote, “Lincoln criticized popular sovereignty, questioning how it was that this doctrine
Domestic Policies Taxes are made by individuals and business to support government activities. The three types of taxes in Nebraska are Sales, Income, and Property. The sales tax is split from 5.5 percent and 1.5 percent to add up to seven percent of the state's tax. The Federal tax is the state's tax, and the Property tax includes the schools and the roads we drive on. The tax determines the location of the sale, the sales tax rate is calculated in effect at that location.
Bleeding Kansas was a violent and corrupt part of our nation's history that’s why it significant to our history because two states were fighting to make Kansas a slave state and it led right up to the beginning of the Civil War Bleeding Kansas was important, it was significant to American history, and it led to the Civil War Bleeding Kansas was significant to American history Bleeding Kansas was important to American history because it was a time where there was a lot of violent protesting Bleeding Kansas led to the civil war because it had two groups of people fighting over slavery which was one of many reason for the starting of the Civil War. Bleeding Kansas was significant to American history. This event took place from 1854-1861
This resulted in the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, the Pottawatomie Massacre of 1856, which
In the years prior to the Civil War, northerners and southerners experienced violence and madness in their everyday lives. The Civil War resulted from social, political, moral, and religious differences between the north and the south. As the country continued to expand West, Congress consistently revisited the question of slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 proposed by Senator Douglas set the stage for violent territorial disputes over slavery. In 1856, Preston Brooks’, a member of the House of Representative, viciously attacked Charles Sumner, a Massachusetts Senator, for his speech “The Crime Against Kansas,” in which he directly attacked Southern beliefs and actions as savage and inferior to Northern behavior.
Moreover, there was much trouble in Kansas such as the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that two states, Kansas and Nebraska would be made up out of what was left of the Louisiana Purchase. These two territories could decide if they about slavery. Later, the people of Kansas wanted to separate their state into antislavery and pro-slavery groups. In March of 1855, elections for this idea began.
In Kansas there was conflicts between the states in the north and in the south because of Stephen Douglas Many people died, cities where raided because of what this man did. Douglas proposed a bill on popular sovereignty or the Kansas Nebraska act which would repeal the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which said that slavery could not extend above the 36' 30" line. He assumed settlers would never choose slavery He proposed this because he wanted a railroad between these states which would run through Illinois, his home state. To build that railroad he needed to make Kansas a state.
They wanted to settle new territories and make them slave states by Popular Sovereignty. So, Stephen Douglas created the Kansas-Nebraska bill which would create two territories: Kansas west of Missouri and Nebraska west of Iowa. During 1855 and 1856, Pro and Antislavery settlers poured into Kansas with the intent to influence the Popular Sovereignty law. Proslavery Missourians that crossed the border to vote in Kansas were nicknamed Border Ruffians. Tensions clashed and came to a point in Lawrence Kansas.
The fate of their country by Michael Holt is a book made up of 3 to 4 sections, titled Pandora's Box, The Wilmot Proviso, The Compromise of 1850, The Kansas-Nebraska Act. Author Michael Holt examines what caused the Civil War and the Pandora’s Box of sectional dissent territorial slavery issue over slavery into all current and future western territories also the Missouri crisis debate. It wasn’t slavery per the book but the debates about the extension of slavery into new territories and states that sent the nation careening into civil war, argues writer Michael Holt. He gives his readers an analysis of the partisan political forces, on the great debate over the extension of slavery into the American West.