The electoral college is an institution that can be found deeply rooted in the functionality of both the state and federal government. Due to this fact, calls for the abolition of the electoral college may cause for many changes to occur in these systems of government. In order to be able to decide whether or not we as a nation should update our electoral system, we must compare both the positive and negative effects that the abolition of the electoral college would have on these institutions. To start the paper, I would first bring to attention the history behind the winner-takes-all system and the intention of the states to move to this system. I would explain that the electoral college promises two electoral votes to every state, and how this disproportionately advantages smaller states. Getting rid of the electoral college would effect the amount of power that the smaller states …show more content…
Feld. 2005. “Thinking about the Political Impacts of the Electoral College.” Public Choice 123(1-2): 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11127-005-3210-4. This source would be used to explain the electoral colleges role in the bicameral process.
Johnson, B. J. 2005. “Identities of Competitive States in U.S. Presidential Elections: Electoral College Bias or Candidate-Centered Politics?” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 35(2): 337–55. doi: 10.1093/publius/pji017.
This source would be used to explain the ability of the electoral college to create a competitive atmosphere between states. I would also go farther in depth about the complicated relationship between states and how the changing of that very relationship would most likely cause for a change in the US democratic system.
Nelson, Michael C. 1974. “Partisan Bias in the Electoral College.” The Journal of Politics 36(4): 1033–48. doi: 10.2307/2129405.
I would use this source to further explain the partisan bias that can be found within the electoral college, and what states have been trying to do to rectify
The checks and balances that the founders desired between the Senate and the House would be reflected in the competing political parties within the House. 2. Sanford Levinson argues that the Electoral College is a “dreadful system of presidential selection” that is beyond defending. Using Madison’s Notes and the Federalist Papers, explain the A) purposes of the Electoral College (why they chose this method over others) and B) whether or not Publius’s defense applies to current debates over maintaining or eliminating the Electoral
The United States government is one of the most admired and complex in the world, On the contrary one of the fundamental components that has an extensive impression on the American People and the Election is the Electoral College. Our founding fathers created The Electoral College over two hundred years ago, and it is still in effect today. They feared that having just the Popular Vote would give too much power to one person. In this paper, we will be discussing what the Electoral College is, the benefits and disadvantages of the Electoral College as well as if the Electoral College should be abolished or reconstructed.
As the mode in which electing a president needed to prevent the possibility of “cabal, intrigue, and corruption”, stated by Alexander Hamilton, and thus the Electoral College was born. Our current system follows the regulations dictated by the US Constitution and 12th amendment: each state is assigned a number of votes based off said state’s population and whomever receives the majority of the votes wins that year's election. The system was crafted in attempts to make sure bigger states did not hold an absurd amount of power over smaller states; it was crafted to serve the republic. The political and socio-economical climate is completely different than the one in which the Electoral College was created in. In fact, the original design was “supposed to work without political parties and without national campaigns”, giving more choice to the public.
The washingtonpost.com says, “Every state is guaranteed at least one seat in the House and two in the Senate.” This shows that the Electoral College gives each state a fair vote according to their size. It also keeps larger states from having too much of an advantage over smaller
The Electoral system is a large part of the cohesiveness in our country and requires the distribution of support throughout our election process. This paper will describe the structure and function of the Electoral College, will compare the Electoral College to a popular vote approach for elections, and assess the value of an individual citizen’s
The Electoral College should be eliminated because people do not have a clear choice in choosing the next President. This research paper will be discussing how the Electoral College affected the results of the Election of 1824 between the candidates Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams, and the political turmoil caused by the rumor of a “corrupt bargain”. The “corrupt bargain” occurred when Henry Clay, who had a spot in the House of Representatives, convinced the House of Representatives to elect John Quincy Adams. After John Quincy Adams was named the winner of the election, even though he had the least amount of electoral votes and popular votes, Henry Clay became his Secretary of State. After this, many Andrew Jackson supporters declared
However, the Electoral college is, in fact, unnecessary for a multitude of reasons. The first of which is the change in population geography. In 1789, the entire United States only held about four million people (Kimberly). Compare that to the 326 million people in 2017, and the differences are staggering (“U.S. World and Population”). The Electoral College delegates a number of votes to the population of a state.
It will also help to prevent any fraud that could possibly occur. Because each and every individual state has its own different system and way of managing votes and collecting results, it creates a very reliable form of checks and balances. This makes it very difficult to cheat or to try and manipulate the vote count in any possible way. Also, more often than not the winner of each individual state’s Electoral College votes is usually clear, this really helps to make it way less likely of having any disagreements or disputes over the end outcome of the election. Without the Electoral College there would be so much more fraud and manipulating within the election.
In fact, this is what the Electoral College was initially intended to be. It was made to be a compromise between the smaller states and the larger ones back when it was first written. In theory this wouldn’t be an incredibly bad idea, however in practice the Electoral College has been exploited. Malicious parties have used the Electoral College to win the presidency without winning the popular vote. While it is true that the Electoral College gives small states more power during the elections it takes away from other voters, for example look at Texas and Wyoming.
Despite the waning support for amending the constitution to alter the way American’s cast their ballots, throughout each election cycle media outlets discuss the fear surrounding the minority candidate, in terms of the popular vote, becoming the President. In an interesting article published by Forbes magazine just before the 2012 elections Taylor Broderick discusses the fifteenth, nineteenth, and twenty-sixth amendments and explains how these create a precedent for altering the U.S. voting system through amending the Constitution (Brodarick, 2012). He also argues that the Electoral College incites voter apathy in states which are not saturated with campaign efforts. In other words, people are more likely to participate in an election if they live in swing-states where candidates are actively campaigning. For these reasons, along with American’s historical opposition, Broderick believes politicians should gain public support for Congressional action, as Bayh did in the late 1960s, to throw out the current voting procedure.
In 1787, years after the founding of the United States, the Constitutional Convention met to decide how the new nation would govern itself. The delegates understood that the need for a leader was necessary but still bitterly remembered how Britain abused of its power. The delegates agreed that the President and Vice President should be chosen informally and not based on the direct popular vote, thus gave birth to the Electoral College. The Electoral College is defined as “a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president.” Since 1787 the Electoral College has been the system for voting in the United States, but with our nation ever more changing and growing it
Because it allows smaller states to influence who is elected president, the Electoral College is a crucial component of the current system. The Electoral College has been the subject of ongoing discussion about the effectiveness and fairness of the electoral process in the United States. There are compelling arguments to keep the Electoral College as an essential part of our democratic system, even though many call for its elimination. By analyzing its importance, its function in representing smaller states, and its propensity to foster a sense of national unity. The electoral college system is still an essential tool for making sure that every citizen's voice is heard and respected during the presidential election process.
The answer is a great example of Federalism, because both the federal and the state government are involved in the process of electing our president. This paper will examine, how the Electoral College works, why we want the states to be part of that Federalists family, advantage and disadvantages of the existing system and, also I will address the most recent election Hillary vs. Trump, where the winner of the popular vote was denied the presidency. For that reason being, we will talk about the possibility of reforming the current system. Going back to the ideas of the Virginia Plan on how we put the constitution together, it stated it the congress is who should choose the president. Kind of like a parliamentary system.
Along with keeping balance between the states, the Electoral College also helps keep independent parties under
In Chapter 2 on “Election Politics,” Pika and Maltese write about the process of how elections occur in America. In 1789 and 1792, electing a president was very simple. Each members of the Electoral College had to cast two votes. One vote had to be for a person out of the elector’s state. In current times, candidates launch nomination campaigns two years or more before the general election.