Before the advancements in science and DNA discovery, there have been many men and woman executed for a crime he/she did not commite. After DNA was discovered there have been cases where DNA has exonerated date row inmates. If DNA wasn't discovered many men and women would have been executed and if DNA testing was available earlier it would have easily proven that Cameron Todd Willingham, Corsicana, Texas was innocent. In 1992 Cameron Todd Willingham was founded guilty in Corsicana, Texas for setting a fire in his with his three daughters in the house. Willingham was able to escape from the fire but his daughters, unfortunately, did not stand a chance. After the firefighters were able to enter the house little girls were found dead in the …show more content…
One evidence that was presented in court was that "It was discovered that the fire was caused by a type of liquid accelerant" (Clarke, 2007). The first arson expert on the case attempts to the investigator the cause of the fire by tracing the fire to its points of origin and then found that the fire was caused by a liquid accelerant. “an accelerant is any substance or mixture that "accelerates" the development of fire. Accelerants are often used to commit arson, and some accelerants may cause an explosion” (Wikipedia.org/Fire_accelerant). Another was the fellow inmate, Johnny E. Webb, who testified that Willingham confessed to him that he was the one that set the fire with his daughters inside the house.However, "the acceptance of the testimony of his fellow inmate was controversial because this was a confession that was not really proven to be true (Williams, 2012). The inmate may have made up the story & lied in court I order to reduce his sentence. Johnny E. Webb was a drug addict and was on psychiatric medications. Never-less the inmate testimony was taken serious and Willingham was given the death penalty. “Evidence discovered years after the Willingham execution showed that the prosecution had given Webb favorable treatment, then deliberately elicited perjured testimony from
This was the cause of the fire as well the combustible materials within the home also strengthened the fire to its maximum. My forensic team and I made a perimeter around and secured the burned house to prohitbit bystanders or anybody to enter the crime scene. As I walked throughout the residence, I discovered three bodies that were severely burned. One of them was identified as Josh Powell.
Willingham's questionable past hindered his defense and even played a part in his attorneys' ability to defend him. Todd's attorney himself was unsympathetic, and later even admitted he didn't believe in his story. Years later just before he was to be executed pen pal Elizabeth Gilbert, recognized he may not have received a fair trial she found some holes in the state's case. The original reports determined the fire as an arson based on the burn patterns in the house. However by this time improvements within forensic analysis proved there was no evidence of arson, and those burn lines were products of flashover.
Roper Vs. Simmons Christopher Simmons committed a capital murder in September of 1993. Simmons was only 17 at the time. Simmons had an accomplice, his friend Charles Benjamin who was only 15 years old.
Shirley was then convicted of helping her son burn down the house as well as using stolen credit cards from the victims. She admitted to using the cards but not committing the arson. A NY State Police Trooper by the name of David Harding testified that he found he print on a gasoline
The fire investigators were able to tell in that house, three different places where a fire had originated from. These three places include: the hallway, the children’s room and the front door. Vasquez was able to testify that the fire was set by human hands intentionally (Grann, 2009). Samples of materials that had been burned in the house were collected and sent to the laboratory and the case had been classified as a triple homicide and Willingham became the main suspect. Police conducted interviews of witnesses and canvassed the neighborhood for additional statements in regards to Willingham’s actions and previous
Another inmate, Ernest Ray Willis, had a case that was freakishly similar to Willingham’s. In 1987, Willis had been convicted of setting a fire, in West Texas, that killed two women. Willis told investigators that he had been sleeping on a friend’s living-room couch and woke up to a house full of smoke. He said that he tried to rouse one of the women, who was sleeping in another room, but the flames and smoke drove him back, and he ran out the front door before the house exploded with flames. Witnesses maintained that Willis had acted suspiciously; he moved his car out of the yard, and didn’t show “any emotion,” as one volunteer firefighter put it.
Cameron Todd Willingham is not guilty of arson and therefore not responsible for the deaths of his three daughters. Todd is not guilty of arson and the death of his 3 daughters. In the documentary, experts say there is no proof of arson. Since it wasn't clear how the fire started, an arson expert came to investigate and said that there
Alan Crotzer—DNA Exoneration In the United States, there have been a total of 321 DNA exonerations to date, with twenty of these exonerees having served time on death row (“The Innocence Project,” n.d.). Alan Crotzer was not one of these twenty, however he was sentenced to 130 years in prison for a crime that he didn’t commit. Charged and convicted of sexual battery, kidnapping, burglary, aggravated assault, robbery, and attempted robbery, it wasn’t until 24.5 years later, on January 23, 2006, that Crotzer was released from prison after post-conviction DNA testing proved his innocence (“The Innocence Project,” n.d.).
On December 23, 1991 a fire claimed the lives of three girls. The fire was thought to have caused the fire that killed them. Mr. Willingham was executed February 17, 2004 and claimed his innocence multiple times including the day he was put to death. Even though, Mr. Willingham has already been executed there is a lot of conflicts about his death. The conflict had arisen when many fire officials determined there was not significant amount of evidence to determine the fire was caused by him, or even that it was arson.
The first bit of evidence that convicted Tod Willingham of arson was the fire allegations. They were unjustified and used outdated information to prosecute Tod. A study was done by professional arsonist John Letini and Dr. Hurst showing how the fire department’s report was false. “That in and of itself is enough to toss a case out for arson. ”-John
On September 15th, 1963, a few of the girls were changing into their church robes. Without warning, dynamite exploded and killed four of the girls. These girls were in the age range of 11-14 years old. The worst part, police knew who killed these girls and didn't say anything about it for almost 40 years. Bombing in Birmingham
Since the founding of our judicial system there have always been individuals claiming innocence to a crime that they have been found guilty of, traditionally, after their sentencing no matter how innocent they may or may not be would have to serve, live and possibly die by the decision of their peers. The Innocence Project, founded in 1992 by Barry C. Scheck alongside Peter J. Neufeld faces this issue by challenging the sentencing of convicted individuals who claim their innocence and have factual ground to stand upon. The Innocence Project uses the recent advances in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing to prove their client’s innocence by using methods that were not available, too primitive or not provided to their clients during their investigation,
However, there is no way to gather the exact percent of individuals that have been wrongfully convicted. DNA evidence has certainly decreased the number of wrongfully convicted, unfortunately, there
Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong In Brandon L. Garrett 's book, Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong, he makes it very clear how wrongful convictions occur and how these people have spent many years in prison for crimes they never committed. Garrett presents 250 cases of innocent people who were convicted wrongfully because the prosecutors opposed testing the DNA of those convicted. Garrett provided simple statistics such as graphs, percentages, and charts to help the reader understand just how great of an impact this was.
The Murder of Danielle Van Dam By: Nevethan Jeyachandran Submitted to Dr.Monica Sauer Student Number: 500-523-913 Course: Intro to Forensics (CCHY-183) December 01, 2014 Introduction The Murder of Danielle Van Dam is a gruesome case which took place in the year 2002. A 7-year old girl went missing from her bedroom in San Diego, California, on Feb1-2, 2002. Her badly decomposed body was found in a remote area far away from her home on February 27. Police suspected a neighbour, David Alan Westerfield for the murder.