Crito was able to get passed the prison guards, in the morning, to find Socrates and try to convince him that he should escape from his jail cell. Crito and Socrates each provide arguments of why Socrates should escape, and Socrates provides his reasons of why he will not. The three arguments are if Socrates does not escape he will hurt Crito, if Socrates is worried what will happen to his friends and family, and lastly, if Socrates violates the agreement with the law. Socrates would rather follow the laws and have the death penalty then escape and flee to a different city. If Socrates does leave Athens then the people will most likely think that Socrates was guilty of the charges against him. Crito does seem like a good friend to Socrates, but is trying to help Socrates in the wrong way. …show more content…
Crito explains that all he needs to do is make a few bribes and Socrates will be free. Crito seems like a master in bribing since he bribed the prison guards so he could talk to Socrates. Also, if Socrates does not escape then Crito will lose a friend and if Socrates dies, then people would think that he didn’t try to do anything to save Socrates life. The citizens of Athens might think that Crito did not use any of his resources to safe Socrates, such as bribing certain people and using money. Crito says to Socrates that he should not be worried if his friends get in trouble for helping him be free. His friends are willing to risk their lives and help pay off the guards or anyone in a higher power. Crito says that there are even strangers, Simmias the Theban, Cebes, and many more that are willing to provide money to help you be free. Crito then goes on saying that he does not have to stay in Athens, but he has friends in Thessaly were Socrates can stay and be protected. Socrates is grateful that many people are willing to help him escape, but he would rather stay in
However, instead of planning the escape Socrates started the dialog about why he would rather obey the law and be executed. At first, Crito presented two arguments to
One just assumes that the person will obey the laws that have been set forth by that city. Assuming this is problematic in that there is no justifiable reason why one must obey the laws set by his or her state, other than the assumption that to disobey these laws will create problems that can lead to the breakdown of society. This point is certainly valid, yet it is not made clear rather as such implied throughout the conversation between Socrates and Crito. The underlying assumption is that men are like slaves, who must be ruled by one of a variety of systems; otherwise, each person as well as the city or state itself would suffer due to the lack of guidance in a society without laws. During the time of Socrates’ an open democracy was based on laws that a council of men deemed worthy of a vote and set in place to represent all citizens in that state (Athens).
Crito is distressed by Socrates reasoning and wishes to convince him to escape since Crito and friends can provide the ransom that the jury demands. If not for himself, Socrates should escape for the sake of his friends, sons, and those who benefit from his teaching according to Crito. However, Socrates denies the plan of escape. The three arguments to be acknowledged are as follows: the selfish, the practicality, and the moral. Socrates reason not to escape, Socrates explanation of the good life, and an objection for breaking the laws that would put no harm to his fellow citizens is
Socrates’ Arguments in the Crito In The Crito, Socrates argues that he should not escape prison because it would be morally incorrect. He says that the really important thing is not to live but to live well. Therefore, by escaping prison, not only will he suffer the consequences but also his family, his friends, and the city of Athens. Socrates argues that the city of Athens would be affected if he escapes from prison.
Argument 1 and 3 Crito gives Socrates are about Socrates hurting him, by losing a good friend and he’ll have bad reputation. He’ll receive bad reputation
From beginning to end, Aristotle’s captivating reading, Crito, is composed with of the three rhetorical devices: logos, pathos, and ethos. Consequentialy, one of the existent rhetorical devices is more robust than the others. Whilst logos and pathos spawn well-founded emotional and logical enticement, the most indisputable rhetorical device used throughout the story is ethos. Undoubtably, ethos is the utmost evident rhetorical device in the story, Crito, as Socrates honorably stood by his morals, even after Crito tried to prompt the man to abandon them; demonstrating his thickness of character, integrity, and honesty.
Careful analysis of The Crito would prove that Socrates does have those qualities as seen from his determination to stay in prison,
On his way to his death some might say he should escape since his trial is unjust. Some might argue, like Socrates, that it isn't right for him to escape and go against his word. His friend Crito is trying to argue the reasons why Socrates is in the right for escaping, while Socrates is arguing the opposite, why his morals will not allow him to do so. Socrates argues many things and makes very firm arguments.
It is impious to bring violence to bear against your mother or father; it is much more so to use it against your country.” What we say in reply, Crito, that the laws speak the truth, or not?” (TDS pg 51,52). By breaking the law, Socrates would be disobeying the laws as a citizen, like a child disobeying his parent. By escaping he would have been doing an impious act that would affect his standing with the gods.
He claims that this is how he has been able to live a long life in Athens and that he never meant any harm to the state. Socrates believes that for
The Social Contract Plato’s Crito depicts a conversation between Socrates and Crito. Socrates’ friends intend to help him escape from prison before he is executed. Their conversation touches upon subjects like justice, injustice and the appropriate response to injustice. Socrates argues that one must not answer to injustice with more injustice as that would be an injury to the laws and to the city of Athens.
Was Socrates right to say he would stay in Athens no matter the consequences, or should he have fled Athens to avoid death? Socrates was right to say he would stay in Athens no matter what because first, he believed he was sent to Athens or “placed in Athens” for a specific reason and he also believed that even though the Athenians found him as a threat and annoying, he believed that it helped them. Socrates was right to say he would stay in Athens no matter what the consequences were because he believed that he was placed or in Athens for a reason. This quote from “The Apology” is an example to prove that he was placed in Athens for a reason. “Because if I tell you that doing that would mean disobeying the god, and so I can’t keep quiet,
The version of Socrates presented in both The Apology, Crito, and The Republic could very well be two different versions of Socrates as presented by Plato. However, both versions of Socrates have one thing in common: they both value the importance of philosophy and they both defend philosophy as something that is important to humanity. The Apology is Socrates defending not only himself, but also philosophy as an area of study that could be useful to the city of Athens. Socrates is trying to defend himself and his study and he tries to distance himself from the sophists in that they charge for money.
Crito and others have the money to bribe the informers and wants Socrates to let go of his fears if he has any because it is well worth the risk. (Crito,45a.) Crito believes he will be welcome in cities such as Thessaly where he has friends that
To be just or to be served an injustice and obey, this is the very basis of the philosophical dialogue between Socrates and Crito. The Crito begins as one of Socrates’ wealthy friends, Crito, offers Socrates a path to freedom—to escape from Athens. Through the ensuing dialogue, Socrates examines, as a man who is bound by principles of justice, whether an unjust verdict should be responded to with injustice. In the dialogue between Socrates and Crito, Socrates outlines his main arguments and principles that prevent him from escaping under such circumstances. Socrates is under guard when Crito visits him, thus the plan to escape.