16 Personality Test Analysis

The 16 Personalities Test is designed to figure out a test taker’s personality among 16 different kinds of people, such as a defender or an artist (ISFJ Personality, 2011). The test taker needs to rate 60 questions which relate to the test taker’s hobbies and lifestyle on a scale with 7 degrees from agreeing to disagreeing (ISFJ Personality, 2011). After that, the personality test calculates the test taker’s personality from five traits through percentages, mind (extraverted to introverted), energy (intuitive to observant), nature (thinking to feeling), tactics (judging to prospecting) and identity (assertive to turbulent) (ISFJ Personality, 2011). Despite the fact that the personality test contains a few questions with similar meanings

Tricky questions which most people will answer yes or no to mitigate bias (Danielson, 2018) cannot be found in the questionnaires. According to Professor Danielson (2018), people tend to answer questionnaires in a socially desirable way. The 16 Personalities Test lacks a filtering process to reduce text-takers unintentional bias. Meanwhile, the interruption of a test administrator can also be biased (Danielson, 2018). For example, a test taker agreeing with “ Your home and work environments are quite tidy” (ISFJ Personality) can be interrupted as assertive. It may not always relate to personality. It can be a result a person work in a particular place, like a

The result of the 16 Personalities Test is designed somewhat closely to the five-factor model in the trait approach. Like the trait approach, the 16 Personalities Test calculates the result in five traits. However, unlike the Big Five in the trait approach which are precise and are not correlated with each other (Danielson, 2018), the five traits of the 16 Personalities Test is vague and somewhat overlap. For example, the meaning of energy trait (intuitive to observant) and the nature trait (thinking to feeling) are similar just with different worldly expression. Besides, it is hard for people to understand the exact definition of these two traits. Test takers can interrupt thinking with a wide range of meanings, such as planning, conventional, ambitious and so on. In that case, the same result of the personality test can be applied to a wide range of people instead of accurately describing one