Santae Tribble Victim: Santae Tribble Suspect: Santae Tribble How the hair fiber made a connection to the case? Hair analysis helped prove that Tribble was innocent.
but unlike blood the fingerprint is unique to a single person. The fingerprints that were recovered show the they belonged to anna. After analyzing the patterns of the fingerprint found and comparing them to and all of the suspects. They belonged to Anna. hair was recovered on the scene.
Thousands of suspects and the filing enough facts to fill more than 753 3-ring binders. In 1999 another victim is identified in Kent as Tracy Winston, 19 years of age. Police start using new DNA process to identify the remains. The case at this point goes cold until 2001 when new DNA testing methods are used. State crime lab start testing Gary Ridgway's DNA with the evidence of the case.
Such as presenting the evidence of the two garbage cans were Herring allegedly hid the stolen stereo and car equipment form Peter’s Mustang. The CPD investigator opened two large sealed boxes containing the garbage cans that were located in the alley. The investigator explained the science to the jurors on finding fingerprints on the cans. The police apply a super glue to the areas of the cans where they think might have fingerprints and then use an LAS system which is a laser light they use to find and see fingerprints on objects. The investigator explaining the procedures on collecting the evidence did so in the simplest and clearest way possible.
They DNA tested all the blood and objects around the crime scene. Her body was covered in blood, but not enough evidence of the murderer at all. Although there was one piece of hair that was not Jane's, the investigators could not find out who it was. Brian Shahan was in charge of the whole investigation. There was a lot of DNA evidence around the crime scene, but there was no way to see whose DNA and footprints were there at that time in the world.
In September of 1961, a woman from District of Columbia had an intruder break into her apartment. While the invader of the home was there, they had taken her wallet, and also raped the woman. During the investigation of the crime, the police had found some latent fingerprints in the apartment. The police then established and processed the prints. The prints were then connected back to 16 year old Morris A. Kent.
Forensic and Behavioral evidence pointed convincingly to Wayne Williams as the murderer of eleven young men in Atlanta. In 2010, a DNA test was conducted on the scalp hairs found on a body dumped down a wooded slope behind an office park on February 13, 1981. It was of 11-year-old Patrick Baltazar. Inside the boy's shirt, two human scalp hairs were discovered. Although the results were not conclusive, the FBI's DNA laboratory listed the odds of 130-to-1 against the hairs coming from any person other than Wayne Williams.
James. A.Williams or otherwise known as, Jim Williams, was a good man, for the most part. He was a well known antique dealer, who was highly respected by all who knew him. He had played an active role in the restoration of Savannah’s Historic district downtown, starting in the mid-1950s. Jim Williams was also well known for his “ have to be there,” christmas party that was always held the day before the Cotillion debutante ball.
Case of Jeanine Sanchez Harm Murder (Fiber) Victim: Jeanine Sanchez Harm Suspects: Maurice
Mr. Woodall’s van was found abandoned at the scene of the crime, his fingerprints and the victim’s blood were discovered in the van, as well as on Mr. Woodall’s front door and inside his home (Supreme Court of Kentucky, 2001). After the autopsy was performed, Mr. Woodall’s DNA was found inside the victim (Cornell University Law School, 2013). At this point, officials felt there was sufficient and compelling evidence to charge Mr. Woodall with
Riverside County sheriff’s homicide detectives announced Tuesday that they have solved the 1977 murder of a Rubidoux bartender. Hair found clenched in the victim ’s hand was recently sent to a private laboratory in Texas for DNA testing, a sheriff said. The DNA test showed that the hair belonged to Frank Wright, who died in 2002 from complications related to alcohol abuse, said Brown of the Riverside County sheriff’s Central Homicide Unit.ames Anagnos, who was known as “Jimmy the Greek,” was found dead Oct. 18, 1977 inside his bar at closing time, Brown said. Anagnos was stabbed 20 times with a steak knife and had been hit four times in the head with a big object Brown said, the cause of death was from injuries to his head.
Wayne Williams was found guilty of the killing of two people. Even years after William’s still tries to persuade the idea of him being innocent. Just like fingerprints, hair analysis is following the same path. I think that DNA fingerprints will become bigger and more accurate of accusing killers, the use of hair analysis will decrease, but I do not think hair analysis should be taken away.
Link: https://splinternews.com/the-fbi-convicted-this-man-using-hair-analysis-it-was-1793847259
Author, Anita Larsen, in her nonfiction textbook article “The Murder with No Body” about a murder solved without an actual victim writes to inform young adults about the role of forensics in solving crimes by using the case of Helen McCourt in a serious tone. This author supports her central idea very successfully. She supports her claim by introducing the case of Helen McCourt, whose disappearance was unexplained and suspicion of foul play could not be proven. She next proceeds to show that a name in the victim's diary led the investigators to blood stained clothes in the possession of Ian Simms, but the inability to prove that the clothes were McCourt’s halted the investigation. Additionally, she explains that the use of genetics had to
The speaker for the night terror informational speech had poor stage presence. Her clothing was extremely casual and she kept constantly swaying back and forth throughout the speech. The introduction did not clearly lay out what all her speech would cover, but she did relate it to the audience. Her over all casualness made the speech lose its professionalism and may lead to some of the audience questioning her credibility.
