Good Afternoon your honor, I am filing a motion for the admissibility of Cameron Awbrey’s statement because there is clear signs of attenuation between the statement given and the arrest. I will prove my case by providing examples of precedent cases similar to the laws involved in Cameron's case. In the precedent case Utah v. Strieff, the accused was survallinced over a short period of time, was subjected to an unlawful stop and arrest but later received a lawful arrest. The question was whether or not the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine applied, which excludes evidence that is gained from an unlawful search or seizure.
As previously mentioned, in the end Randolph succeeds in controlling Joel, but the way he does so confines Joel to Randolph himself, and likewise to the Landing. Randolph manipulates every significant situation in which Joel takes part. He disregards Joel’s letters to his Aunt Ellen. Because Randolph does not send them, it consequently makes Joel feel as if she has abandoned him like his father did when he was born. “But Ellen had never answered his letters.
The United States is a government founded upon the principles of equality, or are we? That is the question studied and debated by historians of American history. Our founding fathers motives are scrutinized through the study of their personal letters, historical documents, and public records. Two historians, Howard Zinn and Gordon S. Wood, support opposing viewpoints. Howard Zinn describes the Founding Fathers as only interested in writing the Constitution to upholding the wealthy’s power.
Throughout one’s lifetime, it is not common that a journey one has pursued becomes a nationwide phenomenon; although, for two men, that was exactly the case. Chris McCandless and Adam Shepard both embarked new, difficult, although different journeys. McCandless embarked on a journey in search of self reliance whilst Shepard left everything to prove that the American Dream is in fact alive and well. These adventurers set out on divergent journeys, but both had a strong impact on society and those they encountered along the way. Although both of these men were hardworking and successful in what they did, it is evident that Shepard’s selfless journey to motivate people to pursue the American Dream had a greater purpose.
The Relentless Revolution by Joyce Appleby is the narrative of capitalism that starts with the voyagers of the 16th century, winds through the 18th and 19th centuries, and continues on through the 1970’s then past that into modern capitalism. Within this long historical narrative, the author’s main argument is to tell the story of capitalism, and how it developed from an idea to an international system. Appleby described the book by saying “This is not a general study of capitalism in the world, but rather a narrative that follows the shaping of the economic system that we live with today” (Appleby 4). Her argument is that the story of capitalism is not a step by step process as some have claimed, rather it is a constant, messy passage from one discovery to the next.
Don Marquis’s purpose to his essay is to set out to prove that abortion is seriously wrong. He is addressing that abortion is morally wrong and should not be permitted except in certain cases. The authors thesis is “Abortion, except perhaps in rare instances, is seriously wrong”(Marquis, 754). Marquis’s purpose for exceptions or rare instances is to eliminate those instances that could be considered ethically controversial such as cases like abortion after rape or abortion during the first fourteen days after conception. Marquis provides another exception in the form of a pregnancy that could endanger a woman’s life and abortion when the fetus is anencephalic.
For anyone ever involved in the game at a competitive level, they understand the ultimate goal. “The Show”. Its everything a child brought up playing baseball dreams about. But it doesn 't just happen overnight. For most like Tom Pauly it means giving up most of every summer, and just about every other day of the year.
That said, I welcome others to reply with counterarguments. First of all, Marquis argued that in order to understand wether or not abortion is wrong, one must analyze why killing is wrong instead of who counts as killing. It seems to me though that you can't disregard who counts as killing when discussing topics such as abortion. I understand that this makes the debate easier for Marquis,
Throughout all of McCandless’s adventures he often meets new people who take a liking to him, despite McCandless having trouble with the concept of intimacy, as he would rather be secluded from everything. Everytime he is confronted with a new acquaintance, he is always offered goods to help him on his journey. However, McCandless is against the fact that you need to have money to be successful in this materialistic world, and he is trying to challenge that idea by going on adventures without any money, as it would be to easy. In this passage he is resenting the fact that he himself cannot make it in this world without money, but he still chooses to live in that lifestyle because it is a much more free life, away from everyone.
“I became the mistress of Mr. Glenmurray from the dictates of my reason, not my weakness or his persuasion. ”(Opie, 88) As mentioned previously according to moral books and feminine ideology women’s virtuosity was associated with the preservation of their sexual chastity. If that would fail and they would forfeit their most prized quality then a breach of duty towards society would occur. This appears to have been Adeline’s case who, “out of regard to [her] own principles”(Opie, 1999: 41), desired to contract no marriage but to live a free and chaste love with the man of her heart.
It is important before breaking down Hursthouses argument, to examine the basis in which she grounds her claims. We can see through her investigation her examination of whether having an abortion is something a virtuous person would do. A virtuous person therefore, is someone who exercises virtue with virtue being defined by Hursthouse as “a character trait a human
In “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Thomson argues with a unique approach regarding the topic of abortion. For the purpose of the argument, Thomas agrees to go against her belief and constructs an argument based on the idea that the fetus is a person at conception. She then formulates her arguments concerning that the right to life is not an absolute right. There are certain situations where abortion is morally permissible. She believes that the fetus’s right to life does not outweigh the right for the woman to control what happens to her own body.
Mackie’s Arguments Against Ethical Objectivism According to the book The Fundamentals of Ethics, it is stated that ethical objectivism “is the view that moral standards are objectively correct and that some moral claims are objectively true” (Shafer-Landau, p. 294). It is the belief that each individual or person has their own set of moral principles. J.L Mackie explains two arguments against ethical objectivism, which include the argument from relativity and the argument from queerness. In addition he explains and defends his error theory.
Callahan’s opinion on euthanasia is a strong one. He begins his essay with three major points before going on to his major arguments against the controversial procedure. Starting with the topic of “consenting adult killing,” goes on to the limits of self-determination, and the final subject of these three is that medicine should be prepared to help those who need it to achieve their own view on a good life. Moving on, Callahan’s first major argument is on self-determination. He states that euthanasia is not one of these matters.
Moreover, Motopaws Website also saw the difficulty occurring throughout the world about stray dogs and roadkill that have become a problem so they created retro reflective collars for dogs to proscribe or reduce the number of stray dogs and roadkill. “At Motopaws, our mission is to make the streets safer for dogs as well as us, people and our vision is to eventually eradicate the issue of dog road kills and other such accidents caused by their low visibility. The Motopaws collar we make is coated with reflective fabric in order to make the wearer dog visible to us from a distance not only in the dark of the night, but also in broad daylight. The collar, harmless in nature is today worn by thousands of our street dogs situated in more than 20 cities around the country. ”(Motopaws Website).
