A Good Vision For America Essay

A good vision for America should be defined by the promises of its leaders, by the enforcement of the Constitution’s amendments, by a proper economic system and defined by the direction the citizens take it. As an American citizen, in good standing, believing this vision, am sure that there is enough evidence to prove this vision possible; as an American citizen reading today’s current events, announcing yet, how sources for fossil fuels, taxes and homeless ex-military men are of still a conflict in America will disgust a fine amount of Americans. The production of fossil fuels has the potential of immense hazard to the America’s area, in where the government could possibly tax the sales of the fuels to decrease the intake and give the people

A good vision for America consists of smart individuals, those who think outside of the “box;” where if not all of America comes together on their environmental conflicts, those who follow or enforce of what must be done can eventually compose a plan as to how money can bribe its way through these situations. The idea of the American government having more funds would help their economy, its people or even becoming a better creditor nation. Although, the amendments of America’s constitution, the rules that the founding fathers have set for the future leaders, have been decaying as the future leaders treat it; therefor, the government will eventually come to the idea of raising taxes overall for total products, believing that the increased toll for fossil fuel sales were nice enough, a good vision for America consists of leaders who go by the people’s idea for the future as to being the self-government they really are. America had come this far by only the brave men, military individuals, who put their lives into the future foundations; as battles were won but even lost, terrain claimed or even surrendered, America’s military army did not give up. The equipment and area the military required came from taxes also, where in the government’s belief that perhaps not raise the cost of taxes for the people, but increase what was taxed