ipl-logo

A New Perspective: The Injustice Of Torture

850 Words4 Pages

Kally Johns
Dr. John Burchill
CRIM 105: Introduction to Justice
28 March 2016
A New Perspective: The Injustice of Torture

There are various debates and conflicts about the subject of torture and if it is ever justified. Most individuals believe that torture violates the human dignity of the victim. Comparatively, other individuals express that some situations exist in which torture is justifiable, depending on the circumstances. Similarly, my original opinion on torture also expressed the belief that torture may be justified in certain situations. However, throughout the semester the ideals of Immanuel Kant, and the understanding of the human right involving no torture, inhumane, or degrading treatment, have instigated a change in my beliefs. …show more content…

This declaration declares that there shall be no torture, inhuman or degrading treatment to an individual (United Nations). Prior to this class, I honestly was unaware about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the actual human rights for every individual. However, with its exposure I felt that I had an obligation to abide by these rights. If I was allowed to enjoy the universal dignity set forth by the declaration, why should others be denied equal treatment. Another perspective of torture is expressed by Immanuel Kant, and also influenced a change in my opinion. Kant argues that a person is good or bad depending on the motivation of their actions, not the goodness of the consequences of those actions (Sandel 2009). As Kant said, if someone's emotions and desires cause them to do something, then it is not morally right because it wasn't motivated by moral or ethical rules. For example, in a real world situation, where the subject killed someone close to you, the motive of the torturer is not that simple. Anger, can easily take over under these extreme circumstances. Therefore, the motives of those viewing torture as “ok” in the situation, are no longer pure. These ideals allowed me to rethink my perspective on torture. No matter the actions of an individual, or the consequences of not torturing someone, I have began to realize that no …show more content…

Throughout this class I have gone from the belief that torture can be morally justified to the belief that torture is unacceptable, no matter the situation. It is a universal human right that "No one shall be subject to torture" (United Nations). The Kantian ideals that torture is a form of injustice, greatly influenced my new opinion. Every human life should be rewarded with respect, without any torture or other mental or physical pain. I believe that torture is cruel and unjust. It is the ultimate violation of another human being's basic human rights. Thus torture is unacceptable in any case. Instead, as a nation we have to set a role model as humanity and respect everyone's equal

Show More
Related

Summary Of Should The Ticking Bomb Prisoner By Alan Dershowitz

1694 Words | 7 Pages

Many have said that they would want nonlethal torture to be used in such cases but “did not want torture to be officially recognized by our legal system.” Similar statements have posited that while “torture might be necessary in a given situation it could never be right.” This approach, that of keeping torture off-the-books, is in direct conflict with the necessity for accountability and transparency in a democracy. A democracy cannot work if the public is kept in the dark. The public must know what is going on in order to approve or disapprove.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Torture's Terrible Toll, By John Mccain

699 Words | 3 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi, the preeminent leader of the Indian independence movement states “You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind.” This is important because torture is brutal on the body and mind. The article “Torture’s Terrible Toll” by John McCain is more convincing then the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin because McCain provides more logical reasoning, he adds his own personal experience of being a captured prisoner during the Vietnam War, and he creates an emotional bond with people around the world. Through more logical reasoning McCain Argument is more valid than Levin.

Read More

Michael Levin The Case For Torture Summary

686 Words | 3 Pages

The Case for Torture Wins Torture is it morally acceptable? Many have debated this argument but I would like to bring up two main conflicting view points from Michael Levin, and Marzieh Ghisai. Michael Levin is a Jewish law professor who wrote The Case for Torture where he advocates where torture is acceptable in some circumstances.

Read More

Curt Goering's Rhetorical Analysis Of Torture Is A Crime

295 Words | 2 Pages

After finding some torture tactics, it helped me research about the negative effects of torture. In his article, “Torture is a Crime”, Curt Goering listed the negative effects of torture. He argues that torture is illegal, ineffective, immoral and makes those around us unsafe. Curt uses ethos in his piece to back up his main argument. For example, he mentions that in 1984, the UN adopted the Convention against torture and it was ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1990.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Torture Myth '

1050 Words | 5 Pages

While analyzing “The Torture Myth” and “The Case for Torture”, it is very clear to see the type of rhetorical appeals used to persuade the audience. Anne Applebaum, the writer of “The Torture Myth” --in context of the decision of electing a new Attorney General--would argue that torture is very seldomly effective, violates a person’s rights, and should be outlawed due to the irrational need upon which physical torture is used. On the other hand, Michael Levin strongly argues that physical torture is crucial to solving every imminent danger to civilians. Levin claims that if you don’t physically torture someone, you are being weak and want to allow innocent people to die over something that could have been simply done.

Read More

Summary: The Effectiveness Of Torture

1854 Words | 8 Pages

Torture is mainly seen as morally wrong. The Los Angeles Times wrote about what the readers think about torture. In the article Torture is wrong: Readers agree, even if most Americans might not, discusses the opinions of their readers on how morally wrong torture can be even if it’s to a terrorist. One of the responses on the Los Angeles Times was from Martin Wauson of Westminster saying, “Injuring or killing an informant defeats the purpose of interrogation” (Los Angeles Times). The point of interrogating a terrorist is to gain information on what ever the problem may be.

Read More

Argument Analysis: The Case For Torture By Michael Levin

590 Words | 3 Pages

If given the chance to save hundreds from a terrorist attack and all one had to do was carry out torture, would they do it? What if a young child was kidnapped and the police wanted permission to torture the kidnapper, would permission be granted? In “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin, he explains that torture is sometimes necessary. I agree that torture could be necessary depending on the situation at hand. Levin explains that torture can be morally mandatory, justified, and can prevent future evils.

Read More

Michael Levin's The Case For Torture

766 Words | 4 Pages

In “The Case for Torture,” Michael Levin’s argument points out his beliefs in thinking that torture is justified in most cases. His statements throughout the article are pointed to more of a one sided approach in saying that it is barbaric, but is really supporting in the ways torture can be useful. To people that would disagree with the author’s points in the argument, Levin provides a good outlet to both sides that are pro-torture and non-torture, but, he goes more into thinking that it is unwise. To Levin’s understanding torture can only be used to save innocent people’s lives. His article has many provocative statements that make you question whether or not torture is a good way to find out about lifesaving intel or just to be used for

Read More

Is Torture Ever Ethical?

1207 Words | 5 Pages

There have been endless debates for view for and against the use of torture to gather intelligence to prevent such a tragedy from happening again. So is the use of torture ever ethical? To help determine, let’s take a look at the views of two well-known philosophers John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Each of these philosophers had strong opinions and stances of

Read More

Because Torture Is Wrong Analysis

381 Words | 2 Pages

In “Because It Is Wrong”: A Meditation on Torture the argument that is being made is torture is illegal because is wrong. The moral that this article presents is that there is no such thing as reasonable torture. In “Rules Should Govern Torture, Dershowitz Says” the argument the author thinks that torture is ever acceptable but in fact it has been used. The moral that this article presents is that we need to acknowledge what is being done and create rules, and have visibility and accountability.

Read More

Propriety Of Torture Essay

588 Words | 3 Pages

A number of influential treaties prohibit the use of torture. For example, article 3:1(a) of the Geneva Conventions restrict the use of “violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture” (Securing Liberty). Article 5 of The United Nations Universal

Read More

Why Is Torture Should Be Banned

316 Words | 2 Pages

In today 's world, torture is considered an inhumane way to treat a human. Torturing should be banned because most of the time it is ineffective and immoral. Everyone has the Miranda Rights which states “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say may be used against you in a court of law”.     Some people say that torture can save lives.

Read More

Arguments Against Torture

631 Words | 3 Pages

According to The Economist, “Even if you allow, as many will not, that torture might be justified under extreme circumstances, it would be difficult to confine its use to those very rare cases.” The essence of The Economists argument is that the U.S. makes cases like this extremely difficult to allow. Torture tactics have been used before and results weren’t pretty. This past year information from C.I.A. leaked and went public. What was discovered from it was the brutal and cruel torture tactics that were done to assumed terrorists.

Read More

The Benefits Of Torture

996 Words | 4 Pages

The word torture has been fine toned into words like interrogation, just to hide its true meaning of evil. No matter how this word has been changed over the years, it still doesn’t make it right. Torture is intentionally inflicting severe pain and dehumanizing someone to gain information.

Read More

Why Is Torture Morally Wrong

1468 Words | 6 Pages

On 1st November 2003, the Associated Press published a report on inhumane treatment and deaths at Abu Ghraib along with other American prison cells as confessed by ex-Iraqi detainees (Associated Press, 2003). Photos of prisoners being shamed, tortured and abused sexually have been made public (Higham and Stephens, 2004). The Office of Legal Counsel in United States Department of Justice used the Torture Memos, which sanctioned some advanced interrogation techniques involving the torture, to justify the prison wardens’ actions. While act of torture in essence is morally wrong, I will argue that there are one-off extreme cases under which torture is morally justifiable so long as torture is not institutionalized. To begin, we have to seek a common definition of torture and explain why it is morally impermissible before uncovering the extreme cases.

Read More

More about A New Perspective: The Injustice Of Torture

Related Topics

Open Document