ipl-logo

A Philosophical Quandary: An Invitation To Philosophy By Matthew Laurents

1610 Words7 Pages

A Philosophical Quandary In, An Invitation to Philosophy, Matthew Laurents proposes a philosophical quandary through the story of a man, Matthew, and his two sisters, Melissa and Melinda. In this story, Matthew is in a terrible motorcycle accident that leaves him in a vegetative state (Laurents, An Invitation to Philosophy 10). At the hospital, Matthew is found to have a “living will” in his possession that states “…in the event he becomes incapacitated, he wishes his two sisters, Melissa and Melinda, to determine jointly what course of treatment should be administered (Laurents, An Invitation to Philosophy 12). He specifically states that they must agree—"after due deliberation of all available information, of course." (Laurents, An Invitation …show more content…

In a broad sense, Plato would agree with Melinda for the most part. To ask the question of whether or not Matthew has a soul and what exactly it means to be alive, we must dive deeper into Plato’s ideas about human existence and what exactly makes us who we are. If Melinda were to side with how Plato thinks, she would employ some of his ideas about how the soul is related to the body in her discussion with her sister. Melinda would probably reference the idea that the soul is the true form of a human, that it is the “true” person (Laurents, Plato's Phaedo 10). This argument pertains directly to what Melinda believes in; she believes that it would be murder to unplug Matthew because you would be severing the soul’s connection to the body, destroying the “real” Matthew. Diving deeper into what arguments of Plato that Melinda might use, there are two predominate cases that Plato makes when it comes to the defense of the soul’s existence; the argument of recollection and the argument of opposites (Laurents, Plato's Phaedo 16,23). The first argument available to Melinda is that of the argument of recollection (Laurents, Plato's Phaedo 16). The argument of recollection is rooted in the idea that our souls exist before our bodies do, and that is why we have certain knowledge immediately when we are …show more content…

Aristotle would agree with Melissa to an extent but would not agree that there is not a soul. Aristotle’s views on the soul stem almost entirely from his basic orientation, or his worldview. Aristotle, in short, believed that the human being does indeed have a soul but it was very much inseparable from the body (Laurents, Aristotle 28). This causes Aristotle to believe that there is no personal life after death (Laurents, Aristotle 29). Aristotle’s views on this subject are rooted in his beliefs that this world is all there is; that observation is king (Laurents, Aristotle 5). This belief is also heavily influenced by his belief that our language is powerful and is what gives us the clearest idea about reality and what our place in it is (Laurents, Aristotle 4). Matthew Laurents puts Aristotle’s view this way, “Aristotle believed that, of all the ways we interact with the world, by far what we do most is talk about things. So, he seems to have thought that language provided our basic clues about the nature of

Show More
Related
721 Words | 3 Pages

“Aristotle was primarily a metaphysician, a philosopher of things, who uses the objective method of proceeding from being to thinking”(Case 1). He was under the wing of many other famous philosophers. Aristotle follows Socrates and Plato in taking the virtues to be central to a well-lived life. Like Plato, he regards the ethical virtues (justice, courage, temperance and so on) as complex rational, emotional and social skills. But he rejects Plato's idea that a training in the sciences and metaphysics is a necessary prerequisite for a full understanding of our good.(Kraut 1).

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

Charles Manson. BY:Wyatt Smith When people think of Charles Manson they think of a psychopath who murdered lots of people but that's not entirely true, he actually never killed anyone. Charles Manson was considered a murderer in the sixties. To understand Charles Manson you will need to understand his childhood and early life, his crimes and the manson murders, and his arrest/trial and his death.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

In response to the long-standing philosophical question of immorality, many philosophers have posited the soul criterion, which asserts the soul constitutes personal identity and survives physical death. In The Myth of the Soul, Clarence Darrow rejects the existence of the soul in his case against the notion of immortality and an afterlife. His primary argument against the soul criterion is that no good explanation exists for how a soul enters a body, or when its beginning might occur. (Darrow 43) After first explicating Darrow 's view, I will present what I believe is its greatest shortcoming, an inconsistent use of the term soul, and argue that this weakness impacts the overall strength of his argument.

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

He mentioned that he would worship the idea of asking them questions, discuss his sufferings to others. He believed that he would win either way because he would be living a better life of finding out who is wide and he could continue his search for true and false knowledge. His arguments are valid because after he states his beliefs, he explains why he thinks what he thinks to be true. He created the theory of, “Either death is a state of nothing ness and utter unconsciousness, or, as men say, there is a change and migration of the soul from this world by another” (Plato).

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

In Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, he explains the soul and comes to the conclusion that the soul is immortal. Through describing the last hours of Socrates life before his execution, he lays out three arguments in support of the idea that while the body may cease to exist the soul cannot perish. In this paper, I will explicate Socrates three arguments for the immortality of the soul and their objections. Then I will argue on the presupposition of the Law of Conservation of Mass, that the universe, entailing the soul, must be cyclical. The Law of Conservation of Mass

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

The final argument of Plato’s Phaedo was created to prove souls cannot perish. Plato does so by arguing how a soul cannot die nor cease to exist on the same fundamental grounds of how the number three can never be even. For the number three holds the essence of being odd, without being odd entirely. Similarly, a soul holds the essence of life through immortality, however the soul is not immortal itself and only participates in immortality, just as the number three participates in being odd. Additionally, an essence or form cannot admit to the opposite of itself just as small cannot be large simultaneously, and hot cannot be cold.

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

To reach this conclusion, I will be splitting this passage into 3 parts. The first section is Aristotle’s introduction to

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

One day, a man named Matthew, misjudged the road and ran into a tree. He suffered from se-vere head trauma, and the doctors found his living will that was in his jacket. Matthew’s inju-ries were so extensive that at best he would be considered brain dead. In his living will he had his two sisters, Melissa and Melinda, in charge of what the course of action should be. But, the thing was that both sisters had to agree on what to do with Matthew.

Read More
1221 Words | 5 Pages

Paul Kalman Philosophy 1000 Section 6 Dr. Altamirano 5 December 2014 “Immortality of the Soul” Throughout this I paper I will attempt to give creditability on my stance regarding Plato’s view of the soul. In Phaedo Socrates presents the idea to society that the soul is immortal and that philosophers like him should look forward to death. I personally agree with his conclusion on the immortality of the soul.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates in the dialogue Alcibiades written by Plato provides an argument as to why the self is the soul rather than the body. In this dialogue Alcibiades and Socrates get into a discussion on how to cultivate the self which they both mutually agree is the soul, and how to make the soul better by properly taking care of it. One way Socrates describes the relationship between the soul and the body is by analogy of user and instrument, the former being the entity which has the power to affect the latter. In this paper I will explain Socrates’ arguments on why the self is the soul and I will comment on what it means to cultivate it.

Read More
207 Words | 1 Pages

Aristotle’s definition of the soul helps him avoid the objection he raises to Plato’s view of the soul, by agreeing about the connection of the soul and body or main points of dualism, but Aristotle raises the interest were he wants to examine it more. In the passage, he states how dualists just end the connection of the mind and body and don’t examine that connection he states

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

In the Republic, Plato gives an argument saying the soul is immortal. In this paper I will present his argument and show that his argument is invalid. I will show why the conclusion is not true and restate the argument to make it valid to help with Socrates’ claim. Plato’s argument on why the soul is immortal: 1. Something can only be destroyed by the thing that is bad for it.

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

To advance this position, I will provide evidence, that will support my way of thinking, from Socrates’ arguments for the soul 's immortality: The Cyclical Argument, The Theory of Recollection Argument, The Affinity Argument, and The Argument from Form

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

In the theory of Forms of Plato he believes in the great height, health, and been strong, are the truth within the essential things instead of the beautiful and good things. The hypothesis of the forms consist of comparing the consequence in life and to secure a higher hypothesis. Socrates not giving a true explanation of consequences states of the soul the following: "the attributes applied to the soul can be occupied to whatever the life causes are as been essential but can 't lose. The soul is not compatible which states that is immortal. Phadeo and Plato state to the concept of tallness and health etc, that knowledge can 't be obtain by perception of not many evidence for the exist of some kinds of Forms.

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

Plato uses the example of a young child who had no knowledge in geometry or trigonometry, can be trained to have knowledge that he did not know he possessed. Plato uses the argument that he would not be able to display the knowledge unless he recollected it. The third argument is called the indestructibility of the soul (the affinity argument). This argument attempts to prove that the soul survives death.

Read More

More about A Philosophical Quandary: An Invitation To Philosophy By Matthew Laurents

Related Topics

Open Document