ipl-logo

Alcibiades Plato Analysis

1013 Words5 Pages

Socrates in the dialogue Alcibiades written by Plato provides an argument as to why the self is the soul rather than the body. In this dialogue Alcibiades and Socrates get into a discussion on how to cultivate the self which they both mutually agree is the soul, and how to make the soul better by properly taking care of it. One way Socrates describes the relationship between the soul and the body is by analogy of user and instrument, the former being the entity which has the power to affect the latter. In this paper I will explain Socrates’ arguments on why the self is the soul and I will comment on what it means to cultivate it.
Alcibiades and Socrates try to figure out what the self really is because in order to cultivate it they would have to know what it is. As mentioned …show more content…

Through self-control. In this dialogue, Socrates explicitly states that the skills used to take care of what belongs to our bodies such as ring-making, or weaving do not make any of us self-controlled. Furthermore, someone who takes care of his body is taking care of something that belongs to his soul, and not himself (Plato, 131c). What Socrates is trying to do in this dialogue is help Alcibiades by teaching him that gaining self-control is to know himself, and before delving into the realm of politics it would be wise to know yourself in order to be a good politician. When you know yourself you are in full control of your actions which will guide you towards what is right and keep you away from what is wrong. That is because knowing yourself is akin to having self-control and when you have self-control you have virtue, and a virtuous person is a person who will do well as a politician because they will not be caring for what belongs to the state but rather the state itself. Just as we would be cultivating ourselves, namely, our souls, the politician would be doing the same for the state, which is the path Alcibiades will

Show More
Related
1674 Words | 7 Pages

Socrates begins to explain how the people all stem from the same “mother”, but they all have a different characteristic within. They have different souls. This portion starts with this: “‘All of you in the city are brothers…but the god who made you mixed some gold into those who are adequately equipped to rule because they are most valuable. He put silver in those who are auxiliaries and iron and bronze in the farmers and other craftsmen… So the first and most important command from the god to the rulers is that there is nothing that they must guard better or watch more carefully than the mixture of metals in the souls of the next generation’”

Read More
1092 Words | 5 Pages

This statement alone shows us that Socrates is using his defense to prove to the Athenians how serious he is. He is instructing them to not follow the way of the higher class at any cost. His instruction is subtle; however, we do know that Socrates would not stop teaching his ideas until he died. By letting the Athenians understand that they must change their ways, he is sneakily telling them that the city is very corrupt and they must fix it, once again instructing

Read More
990 Words | 4 Pages

At the end of Book I of Plato’s Republic, Socrates attempts to persuade Thrasymachus that the just lead a happier and more flourishing life than the unjust (354a). He argues that justice is the virtue of the soul, which allows the soul to perform its ergon, or function, with excellence. Because the soul’s function is to live, justice allows the soul to live with excellence. In this paper, I shall present and critically examine Socrates’ reasoning behind this conclusion. The argument subtly commits the fallacy of equivocation because the term function is ambiguous.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

He uses the example of ruling a city, where a government would change the rules and laws to best suit them, and as the rules are followed by those who act justly, the just would be acting in the favour of the stronger. Socrates objects to this and claims that humans will make mistake, as that is part of being human, and may

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

In Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, he explains the soul and comes to the conclusion that the soul is immortal. Through describing the last hours of Socrates life before his execution, he lays out three arguments in support of the idea that while the body may cease to exist the soul cannot perish. In this paper, I will explicate Socrates three arguments for the immortality of the soul and their objections. Then I will argue on the presupposition of the Law of Conservation of Mass, that the universe, entailing the soul, must be cyclical. The Law of Conservation of Mass

Read More
1113 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates contended that our immortal souls, which reside in the ideal spiritual realm, are pulled into the physical realm by human bodies. However, Socrates claimed that reason is an effective tool that our souls could use in the physical realm to communicate with our imperfect bodies. Because our spirits and bodies come from different realms, it would be difficult for them to connect fully without reason. Socrates' concept of dualism brought in a new era in philosophy, and his achievements and contributions to philosophy will never be

Read More
411 Words | 2 Pages

The final argument of Plato’s Phaedo was created to prove souls cannot perish. Plato does so by arguing how a soul cannot die nor cease to exist on the same fundamental grounds of how the number three can never be even. For the number three holds the essence of being odd, without being odd entirely. Similarly, a soul holds the essence of life through immortality, however the soul is not immortal itself and only participates in immortality, just as the number three participates in being odd. Additionally, an essence or form cannot admit to the opposite of itself just as small cannot be large simultaneously, and hot cannot be cold.

Read More
405 Words | 2 Pages

Plato breaks the justification of knowledge down into two types of realms that show what can be known by reason and what can be known by the five senses. These realms, then divided into two other unequal parts based on their clarity and truthfulness, make up what is known as The Divided Line. By understanding The Divided Line we can fully grasp the differences between the perceptual, also known as becoming, realm and the conceptual, also known as being, realm. The perceptual realm is the opinions and beliefs of people or it can be known as the visible realm.

Read More
1423 Words | 6 Pages

The argument of whether or not a human has a soul has been argued throughout centuries. Derek Parfit discusses two separate theories of personal identity, Ego Theory and Bundle Theory. The argument of which present a more accurate account of personhood is very hard to determine. The Ego Theory has some flaws such the soul is separate from the body and is a immaterialist object within us. Bundle Theory is reinforced and proven by the split-brain case, however it can lead to the argument that there is no self.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

I agree with what Socrates is trying to say in his defense against the council. Socrates believes that we truly have to understand ourselves in order to find the true meaning in life. I believe that this claim stands true because if you aren’t sure about what things in life make you happy and what things you want to get in life then your ambitions might not be in the right place. Throughout his whole defense Socrates doesn’t once admit that he believes he’s at fault. Socrates instead tries to clear up some of the rumors and false thoughts that were spread about him.

Read More
1021 Words | 5 Pages

He claims that this is how he has been able to live a long life in Athens and that he never meant any harm to the state. Socrates believes that for

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

In the Republic, Plato gives an argument saying the soul is immortal. In this paper I will present his argument and show that his argument is invalid. I will show why the conclusion is not true and restate the argument to make it valid to help with Socrates’ claim. Plato’s argument on why the soul is immortal: 1. Something can only be destroyed by the thing that is bad for it.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates was a great philosopher of the Greek world. He was quite an atypical and distinctive person. Being different from all the other philosophers of the land, Socrates was teaching his students ideas totally out of the ordinary from what the society believed was right. As a result, he displeased many people so much that they decided to get rid of him. Socrates was put to trial, accused of spoiling the youth of Athens, tried and sentenced to death.

Read More
1442 Words | 6 Pages

Joseph Daunis Three Classes and the Soul In Book IV of Plato’s The Republic, Socrates draws a comparison between the classes evident in their fictional city to the human soul. Socrates clearly defines the three forms he finds in the city as being the appetites of mankind, or in other words, all human desires, such as pleasure, comforts, and physical satisfaction. The second form discussed by Socrates is the spirit or the component of the soul which deals with anger and perceptions of injustice. The third and final form is the mind or reason, which analyzes and rationally weighs options and solutions to problems. Socrates compares these three forms of the soul to the three classes in the city: producers, auxiliaries, and guardians.

Read More
908 Words | 4 Pages

Aristotle refers to the soul as a part of the human body and what its role is in pursuing true happiness

Read More

More about Alcibiades Plato Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document