ipl-logo

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Cesar Chavez

412 Words2 Pages

Cesar Chavez wrote a piece in the magazine of religious organization on the ten year anniversary of Martin Luther King. He starts off saying that Dr. King was a very powerful man with nonviolent means. Throughout his writing he gives many example of why nonviolence will ultimately succeed over violent means, and give of many appeals of emotional, logical, creditable justification. Dr. King may have dies, but with his death only more power has come to the peaceful citizens of the world. The audience that Chavez is addressing is very familiar with Dr. King, and the troubles he went through so it is not hard at all to relate to the audience with ideas of Martin Luther King. “ Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is a crucial importance to win any contest.” With subject of violent an nonviolent means is so important to almost everyone that it makes almost everyone stand on their toes. With the subject Chavez does a good job of stating “we” instead of “I” because of …show more content…

Mentioning Gandhi, and stating his thought son the best ways peacefully cause change. This is showing the audience that Chavez realizes that these men have proved their methods the best, and he doesn't want to change them just try to use them for the benefit of the people. “ The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause”. This quote really does work so well because of the organization that is used by Chavez to convey Gandhi’s message. If Chavez had not eased this very power quotes into is writing, they would not have been hear the same way. By showing your credibility, and some emotional appeal makes the audience very more open to receiving meaningful and powerful quotes. It simply would not have the same affect on his audience if he did not do

Show More
Related
606 Words | 3 Pages

Cesar Chavez Rhetorical Analysis Throughout the existence of mankind, many cultures and civilizations have encountered a form of injustice treatment that has resulted in political movements. Some were supported by violence, such as the Revolutionary War, which was an ultimate result of Great Britain’s lack of freedom of religion, while others, such as the women’s suffrage movement, were based solely on nonviolence. In one of his magazine articles, Cesar Chavez explores Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s idea that nonviolent resistance is the most powerful when fighting injustice as well as why and how this is possible.

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

He applied cause and effect to prove the outcome MLK’s followers could have if they stick to the nonviolent root. He argues the basic ideal that “people suffer from violence” and he gives the effects of violence which are the loss of strength, a person’s actions become mechanical, and the loss of regard towards human beings. Chavez then utilizes rhetorical questions to allow the audience to ponder why poor workers would commit violence without getting anything satisfactory in return? This creates the overwhelming decision that there is no point for a small poor farmer to commit these horrendous acts of violence if they are just receiving bloodshed in return.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Mr. Chavez worked tirelessly to organize peaceful movements, and stop violent actions from his supporters. Among some of his endeavors were organizing the march on Sacramento, the work strike on the grape growers, and the boycott on the grape growers. These tremendous efforts show his full commitment to La Causa and nonviolence. He would spend 8 years working and organizing movements to protect the lives and integrity of the Latinx community. However, despite Mr. Chavez's efforts to promote peace, his supporters grew frustrated and pushed back with violence.

Read More
404 Words | 2 Pages

The instance in which Chavez states, “Nonviolence supports you if you have a just and moral cause,” he is claiming that violence is the root of corruption and deceit, similarly, he is also declaring that nonviolent protest is always pure and candor. Chavez’s tone seems to be suave and compelling in regards to the aforementioned quote, because he’s also convincing a mass people that nonviolence resistance is easy to accomplish if you believe that your cause is worth protesting. When that is the case, a larger number of people will support you if you’re civil- which isn’t the case with violent protesting. As stated in the preceding paragraph, the people in the world were more inclined in siding with the Indian National

Read More
651 Words | 3 Pages

The assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. devastated a large majority of people around the world. His works of nonviolent acts against racism motivated many, including civil rights activist Cesar Chavez, to solve matters without resorting to inhumane behaviors. Inspired by Dr. King Jr.’s work, Chavez and his union of labor workers devoted themselves to helping those in need through peaceful protests. Similar methods are proven to be successful; Mahatma Gandhi, for instance, gained a great deal of supporters because of his pacifism and tranquil methods of boycotting against British domination. Despite brutal and savage methods of persuasion slowly gaining support, Chavez proves that nonviolent actions are superior; he does so by using ethos in order to uphold moral standards, logos (in reference to the past), and pathos to appeal to the emotions of his audience.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

He gives diction on both sides of the group, violence and nonviolence, that they can both get hurt and “injured or perhaps being killed.” Their actions can put a face on these types of people to show that nonviolent people are weak, but Chavez wants people to pay attention to his footsteps of being an achievable activist of civil rights. The “injury” can come from being in a violent circumstance, which no one wants to be in. Especially being killed for trying to save, protect, and change peoples equal rights. This comes to show that people need to be supporting their beliefs in a more stronger and powerful way to be an obedient leader.

Read More
619 Words | 3 Pages

Chavez encourages the people that no matter the amount of misery, poverty, or exploitation in a situation, it is not more important than a human life. Chavez states that “Freedom is best experienced through participation and self-determination.” He then continues on to gives many examples of nonviolent ways to resolve a disagreement such as, demonstrations, marches, strikes, and boycotts. He informs the people that violence does not work in the long run and is only temporarily successful. When people react with violence it only encourages another form of violence afterwards.

Read More
1309 Words | 6 Pages

Cesar Chavez History Day Project One Mexican American farm worker dedicated his days to better the lives of his people, his name was Cesar Chavez. Horrendous treatment of farmworkers caused Chavez to take a stand for what he believed in, for no one should be treated poorly because of race or social class. During Chavez’s life, he organized peaceful protests, boycotts, as well as participated in a historic 36 day "Fast for life". Chavez not only changed the working rights for farm workers but subsequently gave dignity to the working class of America. The legacy that Cesar Chavez left behind was that he became the most important leader of the Latino people in the United States, and he founded the still standing United Farmworkers of America.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

In 1965, a Filipino union group called The Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee “struck when the Delano grape growers cut the pay rates during harvest” (Rick Tejada-Flores PBS). Because of this, the strike went on, and Chavez became the leader, according to PBS. As a result, the grape strike began and lasted for five years (Encyclopedia of World Biography). Because Chavez learned writings from St. Francis and Gandhi, he decided to put that into play. According to PBS, Chavez’ group would fight without the use of violence.

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

Not only does this statement create more understanding about his drive for change but, it gives more insight on how he felt as a child by saying “as a boy.” Stating that his ambition grew from the frustration and humiliation as a child allows the audience to trust him because he experienced the same injustices he wished to change. In addition to speaking on his feelings of his experience, Chavez builds his own credibility by speaking as the President of the United Farm Workers organization. Gaining the audience’s trust helps build on the credibility of Chavez’s speech which pertains to the use of

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

Sometimes authors use words to bring up strong feelings in others. They can be used to inspire action, provoke or calm people, or even persuade people to make changes and view things differently. Writers use methods such as: analogy, allusion, pathos, or charged language. Starting in 1962, Americans started a movement to try to end the use of pesticides. There were many activists throughout that time who stood up against farmers who were using dangerous pesticides.

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

Featured by his nonviolent actions (boycotts, pickets, and strikes), Chavez accomplished his last fight in 1988, in a 36-day fast. Risking his life, he inspired people who supported to believe in a world of equality. Furthermore, Chavez accomplishments brought a new community and environment to Mexican

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

The Delano boycott and strike is one example of his none violence approach. Originally it was a primarily Filipino boycott, but they reached out to Cesar Chavez for help. The NFWA was a union that consisted of mostly Mexican American farmer workers. He knew how growers historically pitted one race against another to break field walkouts (UFW.org). Chávez understood that things had to be done differently this time around in order for this strike to succeed.

Read More
1476 Words | 6 Pages

Cesar Chavez was a Mexican-American farm worker, his social and economical status was one of the worst in the U.S. society at the time, in contrast, he strived and succeeded in his goals, he reached sky high for his thirst of equality and rights for the minorities, nevertheless achieving this through peaceful, non-violent tactics, he fought for several causes and people, Chavez was a force to be reckoned with because he never gave up and he was never afraid of the consequences of his decisions because he knew what he was doing was right, and this mindset made all the difference when it came to sacrifice what you had for the wellness of others. Chavez had a difficult childhood, as many Mexican-American immigrants, he struggled with money problems during his childhood, Chavez was born March 1, 1927 in Yuma, Arizona. His family owned a grocery store and a ranch, but their land was lost during the Great

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

In the first paragraph Chavez mentions Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, stating that Dr. King’s “entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings…” This reference to Dr. King causes those who know of his impact to realize that he lead a strong historical example of what nonviolence could achieve. By using Dr. King as an example it indicates that Chavez thinks that if nonviolence had heavily impacted the past, then it would most likely do the same in the present and future. Chavez also makes a reference to Gandhi and his nonviolent boycott in India, claiming that what he taught “is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” By using the word perfect to describe Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence, it further supports Chavez’s stance for nonviolent resistance.

Read More

More about A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Cesar Chavez

Open Document