A Rhetorical Analysis Of Steven Pearlstein By Steven Pearlstein

510 Words3 Pages

Steven Pearlstein is a well-rounded and educated man. Pearlstein is thorough with his research and does an incredible job in his article “Meet the parents who won’t let their children study literature.” Of course that title is just the hook to the real title “Forcing college kids to ignore the liberal arts won’t help them in a competitive economy”, both titles pop out and lead into what Pearlstein intends to go over in the work. Parents these days are forcing children to go to college and get the degrees they want well Pearlstein has something to say about that. To the parents who still think that liberal education is a waste of time, at least the kids learning liberal arts won’t mix up meaningful life with maximizing lifetime salary. Pearlstein starts his article off by telling the reader about the assignment he gave his students a few years ago. These students, all of which are honor students, all but one is a non-liberal arts majors. At least half of the class told Pearlstein that the reason that they are not taking something they enjoy is because of their parents, who are forcing them to take degrees they …show more content…

I think that Pearlstein did an over the top job trying to prove his point and showing his multiple sources. However, some of his sources seem less credible, what adult allows their parents to tell them to leave a teacher’s lecture (par. 4)? Pearlstein does do a good job showing the reader how pressured students of today are to impress their family while at the same trying to fill their hunger for knowledge. In the article I felt myself in that position because I have a strong desire to gain more information about history, but I do have the desire to become an engineer, this was pushed ahead of my want to be a history major because of my family wanting me to have an education in a career field with a much larger