ipl-logo

AT & T Mobility Case Paper

1103 Words5 Pages

Preface Information on AT&T Mobility LLC AT&T Mobility is the second largest wireless telecommunications provider in the United States and Puerto Rico, right being Verizon Wireless. It provides wireless connections to all of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands through cellphones, landlines, Internet and U-verse. The company has over 128.6 million subscribers in the United States alone and has its headquarters in Brookhaven, Georgia. AT&T Mobility was founded 16 years ago and formerly called Cingular Wireless LLC until its named changed from the merger in 2007. Cingular Wireless was a combined company that included SBC Communications and BellSouth working together as one communication provider that started in 2000. …show more content…

Concepcion is Vincent Concepcion while the defendant is AT&T Mobility LLC. The issue began when AT&T put out an advertisement that if you sign up for their services you will receive a free phone. When Concepcion decided to partake in this advertisement, he was charged the new subscriber sales tax on the retail value of the free phone. Not knowing of this extra tax he would be charged, Concepcion and members of a class filed a suit against AT&T for deceptive advertising.
They filed a class action lawsuit against AT&T, which AT&T then moved to compel arbitration, based on the arbitration clause contained within their contract of service, since the customers were to sign a contract that agreed to these taxes. The California Federal District Court, where this claim was made, denied AT&T’s motion to compel arbitration under Concepcion’s contract.
The U.S. Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit affirmed this decision. They agreed that the arbitration clause was inacceptable and unenforceable under California law and that the Federal Arbitration Act did not specifically preempt California law from governing unethical acts like this case. Because of this, AT&T appealed to the Supreme Court.
The legal issue in question is whether or not the Federal Arbitration Act preempts states from practicing the implementation of an arbitration agreement on the availability of class-wide arbitration

Show More
Related

Ford Motor Credit Co. 2d 956

525 Words | 3 Pages

Holding: (What rule, definition or standard did the court use to resolve the dispute?) Kirkpatricks ' complaint against Transamerica Insurance Company adequately states a cause of action, in which the court reversed the lower courts decision and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the appellate courts

Read More

Ethics Case Of Darling V. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital

503 Words | 3 Pages

At the end of this case, the court had this to

Read More

United States Vs Ec Knight Company Case Study

926 Words | 4 Pages

This clause was opposed for controlling intrastate activity rather than interstate activities, bringing into question

Read More

Leroy Hendricks Case Study

896 Words | 4 Pages

Mr. Hendricks and his attorney felt that the act created a conflict between criminal and civil proceedings (Campbell, 1998,

Read More

Central District Court Case Of Best Buy And Techforward

275 Words | 2 Pages

The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, case number 2:11-cv-01313. The jury ordered Best Buy to pay $22 million

Read More

Case 2 Live Crew V. Roy Orbison

553 Words | 3 Pages

It concluded that every commercial use is presumptively unfair because of Defendant’s commercial use. Defendant appealed.

Read More

National Labor Relations Board Summary

776 Words | 4 Pages

After review by the U.S. Supreme Court, the court identified two interpretations of the delegation clause of the National Labor Relations Act. Those interpretations said either it is required, “only that a delegee group contain three members at the time of delegation (and not necessarily during the time the delegee group exercises its power)” or that “the delegee group maintain a membership of three in order for the delegation to remain valid.” The Court decided, however, that most meaningful interpretation of the NLRA’s delegation clause requires there to always be at least three members of the National Labor Relations Board in order for the board to exercise their administrative law power. Furthermore they ruled that a two-person board could only rule in a case were there are three active members on the NLRB, but only two participate in the ruling, because in that case the group is still “properly constituted.” The U.S. Supreme court made this decision base on the meaning of section 3(b) of the NLRA, on their interpretation of congress’s intention behind the amending the statute in 1947, and the common law surrounding the issue.

Read More

Asbestos Exposure Case Study

252 Words | 2 Pages

The lower court originally granted summary judgement to the defendant, industrial corporation Alcoa, but the plaintiffs appealed the decision to the state Supreme Court.

Read More

Commerce Clause In Supreme Court Cases

1737 Words | 7 Pages

The Commerce Clause refers to Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution, this clause endows Congress with the power to regulate commerce within the states. The application and intention of this clause has created great debate in American Constitutional law since its inception. Supreme Court cases such as Gibbons V. Ogden (1824), Champion V. Ames (1903), Wickard V. Filburn (1942) and The United States V. Morrison (2000) have all dealt with and set legal precedent in regard to the clause. However the implementation of the clause had never had been so widely scrutinized or debated than The United States V. Lopez (1995). The Supreme Court mishandled the decision regarding the implementation of the Commerce Clause in the case

Read More

Verizon V. Fcc's Open Internet Order

895 Words | 4 Pages

(US Telecom Association V. FCC,

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Terroration Agreements

1407 Words | 6 Pages

See, e.g., Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson; and Great Western Mortg. Corp. v. Peacock, 110 F.3d 222 (3d Cir. 1997). In fact, some courts will not even address the issue of unconscionability when a mandatory arbitration agreement exists; instead of stating that unconscionability is an issue that must be, paradoxically, handled in arbitration. See, e.g., Rojas v. TK Communications, Inc., 87 F.3d 745 (5th Cir.

Read More

Prison Releasee Reoffender Act (PRA)

972 Words | 4 Pages

Issue 6- Does the Act violate the Procedural Due Process? Conclusion 1.

Read More

The Erie Doctrine

801 Words | 4 Pages

The Gilmores were allowed to file the amended complaint because they had evidence of the defendant’s violation of California Civil Code and that the defendant also broke the contract by transferring the payments without notifying the plaintiff. The Gilmores were able to manipulate the process to their advantage because when they submitted their second complaint, they did not include the RESPA claim that the defendant violated federal statutes. Since they did that, the federal court could not claim jurisdiction over it. The defendant could not bring the case to federal court because the plaintiff’s current claim did not include anything related to a federal statute violation. 10.

Read More

At & T Executive Summary

474 Words | 2 Pages

Home Phone AT&T provides home phone services, primarily in the local service areas of the various local service operating companies acquired by SBC Communications.

Read More

Civil Law Advantages And Disadvantages

3020 Words | 13 Pages

A dispute that might otherwise go to court becomes subject to binding arbitration only by the agreement of the parties. In this sense, arbitration is a creature of contract, and the terms of the parties’ particular arbitration agreement are generally controlling. Private arbitration is now governed by the Arbitration Act 1996. The Arbitration (International Commercial) Act 1998 introduced the UNCITRAL Model Law as the procedural framework for international arbitrations. Many commercial contracts include what is known as a Scott v Avery clause, whereby parties agree that in the event of a dispute arising between them, they will resort to arbitration to settle the dispute.

Read More

More about AT & T Mobility Case Paper

Related Topics

Open Document