ipl-logo

Aboriginal Rights In The 50s And 60s

460 Words2 Pages

The push for aboriginal rights in the 50s and 60s was an ongoing problem. This caused major riots and other boycotts. The start of the riots was Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat in order for a white person to sit down. Aboriginals were always second class and didn’t have the same rights as white people. This included not being able to drink from the same public water taps, swim in the same public pools and go to the same schools as well as other significant rules that isolated the aboriginals from the white people. As time progressed the laws were slowly abolished but this did not make the white people show any sort of respect towards the aboriginal people. As time goes on Prime Ministers come and go, all were challenged with getting rid of the aboriginal laws, some made …show more content…

He abruptly announced in August of 1999, that a national apology for the victims of the stolen generation will not be given. Instead he issues a statement of “sincere and deep regret”. He also went on and refused to attend the bridge walk on the 28th of May 2000. John Howard's approach towards the aboriginal rights during his 11 years in office was very sentimental and he often chose not to speak about the situation. He often went on radio shows and talk shows to talk about the issue. On the 29th May 2000, just 1 day after the Bridge Walk, John Howard went on national television and said; “I speak for the entire government on this and it’s a matter that’s been discussed at great length. We don’t think it’s appropriate for the current generation of Australians to apologise for the injustices committed by past generations.” He often felt the issue was not a big deal and would be inappropriate to talk about it. John Howard was not the most ‘active’ prime minister in this situated area and he did not see it as a problem that should be addressed first and foremost before other political

Show More
Related
695 Words | 3 Pages

When the Europeans first arrived in Australia, Indigenous Australians lost all their land rights. This was mainly due to the Europeans claiming that Australia was Terra nullius. Terra Nullius was a international law stating that if territory was not owned, it was to be given to the first nation to discover it and entitled to take over. The Europeans did not recognise the Aboriginals and Torres Strait islander people as the traditional owners of Australia and therefore took all there land rights. The indigenous people were then constricted by the terra nullius rule from 1788 to 1991.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

The riots sparked fresh debate into the welfare of Aboriginal Australians and the response of the police to those living in the

Read More
316 Words | 2 Pages

Over these many years, many personal stories have come out about their experience being an Australian Aboriginal. Beulah Pickwick who is an Australian Aboriginal has shared her story (National). She has experienced a lot of prejudice over the years (National). Beulah grew up with an enjoyable childhood growing up by the Tweed River (National). Growing up she did not suffer much from racism besides some police harassment when was hanging out with her white friends (National).

Read More
458 Words | 2 Pages

Described as “Australia’s Martin Luther King moment” Stan Grant as part of the IQ2 debate series attempted to confirm the legitimacy of that “Racism is destroying the Australian Dream”. Grant pronounced that racism was not only eroding the Australian dream, but lay at its very foundation. Beginning his speech, Grant references the recent controversy involving former AFL player Adam Goodes and the racist butchery which lead to his eventual retirement. Grant talks inclusively about the incident inciting that "When we heard those boos, we heard a sound that was very familiar to us ...

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

It was centuries after colonisation before they could vote, practice religious beliefs and travel. There are still issues surrounding land rights. The Native Americans and Aboriginal Australians share very similar backgrounds. The one advantage Native Americans had was legal recognition about a century prior to the Aboriginal

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

Australia had been arguing over the rules that the government is the U.S were making, soon after that they realised that Australia had the same rules in the government which were treating black people without respect or being polite to them. The white people thought they were better than the black people so they had them as slaves and bashed/killing. Australian finally realised that it was unfair that black people weren’t getting treated equally so a man named Charles Perkins changed the law of Australia and equalised the country completely. Charles Perkins is famous soccer player, he was an aboriginal but he to good to not have him on the teams. Charles Perkins had a group of university students that toured in NSW to stop Racial Equality and then later on it happened to the whole

Read More
1303 Words | 6 Pages

In his speech, he offered an apology to members of the German–Australian community present at the meeting: “The tragic, and often shameful, discrimination against Australians of German origin fostered during the world wars had many consequences. No doubt, some of you carry the emotional scars of injustice during those times as part of your backgrounds or family histories. Let me as Governor-General say to all who do how profoundly sorry I am that such things happened in our country”. 4.

Read More
625 Words | 3 Pages

Sorry Speech (2007) in the acknowledgement of the maltreatment of Aboriginal people which brought Australia closer to

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

This article discusses the speech given by an Indigenous journalist, Stan Grant who participated in a debate where he spoke for the motion “Racism is destroying the Australian Dream’’. Hence, the main points of this article are mostly evidence given by Grant in his debate to support his idea that the Australian Dream is indeed rooted in racism. One of the main points is that the indigenous Australians are often excluded and disregarded as non-Australians simply due to their race and skin colour. Grant pointed out the incident where AFL player Adam Goodes was publicly jeered and told that he did not belong to his country as he was not an Australian despite the fact that Australia indeed is the land of his ancestors.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

Topic Question-4 THE APOLOGY With the past conflict surrounding the stolen generation, most commonly known as the 50,000(Rudd’s apology speech, pg.4) children who were forcibly taken from their homes, separated from there families and raised in the hands of the government. In 2008, Kevin Rudd formally apologised on the behalf of Australia; Mentioning the mistreatment of all the children, the families and anyone who had to endure the “blemished’’ chapter in our nation 's history. Rudd apologising about this chapter in Australia’s history so we can all hopefully move on from this historical disturbance.

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

Kevin Rudd’s “sorry speech”, issued om the 13th of February 2008, was the first official apology from the Australian government taking responsibility for its past mistreatment of indigenous people during the mid-1800s and late 1970s. this essay will be focused on john Howards and Kevin Rudd’s opposing opinions on reconciliation. Howards called Rudd’s apology an “empty gesture” in 2022, 14 years after the apology was made. Kevin Rudd’s apology wasn’t empty gestured as it gave acknowledgement pf past governments policies and allowed for reconciliation.

Read More
1190 Words | 5 Pages

Abstract Being an aborigine in a white dominated society is a complicated identity. Australia, one of the white governed nations, also owns many aboriginal tribes. They lived harmonious lives in the early period. But European colonization has made a profound effect on the lives of Aboriginals in Australia, which led to the total demolition of their native culture, identity and history. As a result the new generation Aboriginals have lost their Aboriginal heritage and have been accepted neither by Aboriginals nor by whites.

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

The Assimilation Policy failed its aim of improving the lives of Indigenous Australians by placing them into white society. This was because white society did not accept Indigenous people as equals, even after indigenous people’s efforts to live like white society. The Assimilation Policy was a huge contributor to the Stolen Generations, this was because the Australian government made it a law to take Aboriginal Australian and Torres Strait Islander descent children and move them into white society. Children taken from their parents were taught to reject their Indigenous heritage, and made to adopt white culture. Their names were changed, and they were forbidden to speak their traditional language.

Read More
1396 Words | 6 Pages

"Reconciliation will not work if it puts a higher value on symbolic gestures rather than the practical needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in areas like health, housing, education and employment." Warren Mundine AO Reconciliation is the action of making one view or belief compatible with another according to the Oxford dictionary of English. The term reconciliation was used as a symbolic gesture in an address made on February 13th 2008 by the former Prime Minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd. Kevin Rudd was the first political figure to speak out and seek reconciliation for the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders after being elected as prime minster in 2007. He spoke out after many generations of mistreated Indigenous Australians that had their rights and equality continuously ignored, but after all that has happened, including the effect of broken families, which still in 2018 have the aftermath of "The stolen generation", there was only one public apology and no compensation for the damages caused to the native people of this country.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Australia has always been filled with racism, starting with the treatment of indigenous people in the past. Many Indigenous children were forcibly removed from their families as a result of numerous government policies. Most of the indigenous children were adopted into white families. They wanted to create a white society.

Read More

More about Aboriginal Rights In The 50s And 60s

Related Topics

Open Document