Abraham Lincoln was known as the president that abolished slavery. He spent his whole presidential term to end it. What was his strongest argument to end it? There are four possible answers for this. Either economically, morally, legally, or military necessity. But which one of these reasons is his strongest argument?
I think that Lincoln’s strongest argument against slavery was that he used morals of slavery with perspectives that all men should be equal. The Civil War was mainly caused because of slavery. Both the North and South had different viewpoints on slavery. The South believed that slavery was meant to be, while the North believed slavery shouldn’t be a thing because of economic reasons. Abraham Lincoln was then elected a month before
…show more content…
Ever since Abe was a child, he always thought slavery was wrong, but he needed some way to prove the people that it was wrong. Ever since he became president, his main goal was to abolish slavery. No matter different views on slavery he got it from, he was always in the same thought and mind of abolishing slavery. In the Lincoln Movie, other people saw slaves as property, but Lincoln has never seen the slaves as property. In Document C, it points out “On the one hand, Lincoln had a strong belief in personal freedom and spoke of the ‘monstrous injustice of slavery.’” This evidence shows that he had a strong belief in freedom of slaves and that he really wanted to help free slaves. It also shows that even in his personal beliefs that he never agreed with …show more content…
Lincoln was a very confidence and a thoughtful thinker. He really wanted the 13th amendment to pass to officially abolish slavery. But he had to express his morals in order to persuade the Republicans and other people who thought slavery was right. In the Lincoln Movie, he made moral arguments such as telling the story of Euclid, “if two things are equal to the same thing then the two things are equal - all people are equal.” This is a morally wrong argument. Although he uses this to convince the Republicans and his writer. When he was talking to Elizabeth Keckler, he told her “you can expect what I expect.” This is also a moral argument, saying that blacks and whites are equals. He also makes an argument using god. “If God now wills the removal of a great wrong, and wills also that we of the North as well as you of the South, shall pay fairly for our complicity in that wrong, impartial history will find therein new cause to attest and revere the justice and goodness of God.” (Document F) With this moral argument, he is saying that they broke God’s rule in “men are all equal” and that they should all stop because God said