ipl-logo

Absolutist Theory Of Morality

1057 Words5 Pages

Before we even begin to tackle this question it is imperative to highlight the fact that in this sense we assume that morality, as Kant suggests, is a priori synthetic; Having a different basis to common knowledge in things such as science which is always a priori analytic and a posterior synthetic. In this sense we can completely understand that Hume is right in asserting the fact that to derive an ought from an is, is impossible and a naturalistic fallacy. However, the question is immediately disproven if we follow the route of logical positivism. Logical positivism doesn’t disprove, but completely discredits philosophies that aren’t based upon scientific knowledge. In this sense, morality is far more than just an expression as it appears …show more content…

Reason cannot motivate action.
3. Therefore, moral judgements are not judgements of reason.
4. There are only two types of judgements of reason, relations of ideas and matters of fact.
5. Moral judgements are not relations of ideas.
6. Moral judgements are not matters of fact.
7. Therefore, moral judgements are not judgements of reason.”
On this basis it seems incredibly difficult to argue that morals are scientific. Another flaw in this absolutist approach is that it doesn’t allow for cultural diversity. Arguably, the upholstering of basic human rights is more important than cultural values. However, if we were to take the utilitarian view of the greatest good (pleasure) for the greatest number, surely to allow a tribe to practice their sacrificial ceremonies provides the greatest good, even if sacrificing a human is unethical in a western society. Once again, a scientific theory (utilitarianism) is undermining a philosophy that says we must base our views on science. Finally, if we were to base our ethics on science and uproot cultural diversity we would be avoiding the laws of social contract. If we take the Lockean theory that one must immerse themselves in the social contract by free will, we cannot enforce a set of absolute ethics on people who do not wish to partake in that ethical contract otherwise it is a violation of their rights and so unethical. The fundamental problem of logical positivism is the repeated contradiction it poses against

Show More
Related

How Did Hernan Cortes Affect Latin America

573 Words | 3 Pages

For the Aztecs, the loss of their culture and population isn’t worth the Spanish profit. However, for the Spanish, the opposite is true. The basic complication of morality is: how do we decide what is right or wrong? Many thought processes answering this question have been developed throughout time, including consequentialism. This is the idea that if the outcome is good, the action is moral.

Read More

Fundamentals Of Ethics By Russ Shafer-Landeau: Chapter Analysis

1376 Words | 6 Pages

The final chapter, chapter 21, of Russ Shafer-Landau’s book, The Fundamentals of Ethics, emphasis is placed on the fact that moral objectivity is not always completely universal but does not mean the idea of moral objectivism has to be rejected. Moral objectivism states that moral standards should be universal but there are some circumstances and exceptions to this claim. Shafer-Landau presents eleven arguments in chapter 21 that some consider challenges to the universality principle of moral objectivity. Not only will moral objectivism be examined in this paper but also another philosophical view known as moral skepticism will be discussed. In addition to the arguments present by Shafter-Landau’s book this paper will include an analysis from

Read More

Summary Of Philippa Foot On Abortion And The Doctrine Of Double Effect

196 Words | 1 Pages

In every day life, we face many situations that require a moral decision. We have to decide what is right and what is wrong? Not always is this an easy task thus, it seems important to analyze how we make our moral decisions. I will start with an analysis of how we make decisions in general

Read More

A Letter From Birmingham Jail Summary

760 Words | 4 Pages

A person’s decision whether they will or will not obey an unjust law will be determined by their moral beliefs. And a person’s moral beliefs is created or centered

Read More

Explain Quinn's Response To Euthyphro Objection

1268 Words | 6 Pages

In this paper I am going to explain what Divine Command Theory is. Then I will explain an objection to it called the Euthyphro Objection. Lastly I will explain Quinn’s response to the Euthyphro Objection and raise an objection to his treatment of the objection. Before I explain Divine Command Theory first I want to explain morality according to Quinn. Quinn states that morality is based on three concepts: rightness, wrongness, and obligation (515).

Read More

Disagreement: Evaluative Diversity And Moral Realism

1377 Words | 6 Pages

This paper will attempt to summarize and explain the essay How to Argue about Disagreement: Evaluative Diversity and Moral Realism by John M. Doris and Alexandra Plakias. They claim that moral realism has a problem with its assertion that all disagreement is superficial, and would not persist under ideal conditions. They cite an experiment by Nisbett and Cohen in 1996 where there seems to be a fundamental disagreement between northern and southern white American men surrounding acceptable violence. Moral realism is the philosophical idea that morality is based in objective fact.

Read More

Innate Morality

1507 Words | 7 Pages

Questions of morality are abstract and extremely touchy. They are subject to enduring debates regarding its origins, nature, and limits, with no possibility of a consensus. Although the theories on morality often pursue diverse angles, among the most interesting ones that have come up in recent times revolve around the question whether human beings are born with an innate moral sense. Some scholars hold the view that humans are born with an inherent sense of morality while others believe the opposite that humans are not born with an innate moral sense holds true. By using Steven Pinker’s

Read More

Grounding For The Metaphysics Of Morals, By J. S. Mill

2236 Words | 9 Pages

Moral concepts “have their seat and origin completely a priori in reason, and indeed in the most ordinary human reason as much in the most highly speculative” (Grounding 411). This explains how moral concepts are founded and have their origin completely in a “priori in reason” or carefully founded in reason, and solely reason, with no prior experience being relied on to make the moral law. With this purity “of their origin lies their very worthiness to serve us as supreme practical principles” (Grounding 411). Essentially, the purity of the moral principles, being founded in complete reason, is the very worthiness that allows us to follow them as our moral principles. If we were to constrain scientific knowledge, this decision would not be made out of reason because of how illogical it is.

Read More

Victor Frankenstein Morality Analysis

908 Words | 4 Pages

Morality. It has been questioned, emphasized, and respected since the beginning of time. Yet even today, not one human being can say what is morally right. Rather, morality is a matter of opinion. It was the opinion of Victor Frankenstein which stated that it was alright to create a “monster”.

Read More

Thesis Statement: Origin Of Morality: Religion And Philosophy

1634 Words | 7 Pages

Thesis Statement: Origin of Morality Outline A.Universal Ethics 1.Karl Barth, The Command of God 2.Thomas Aquinas, The Natural Law 3.Thomas Hobbes, Natural Law and Natural Right 4.Immanuel Kant, The Categorical Imperative B.Morality and Practical Reason 1.Practical Reason a.Practical Reason and Practical Reasons C.Evolution of Morality 1.What makes Moral Creatures Moral 2.Explaining the Nature of Moral Judgments F. Answering Questions 1. What is the origin of Morality: Religion or Philosophy? 2. What does religion say about morality?

Read More

Morality And Utilitarianism

121 Words | 1 Pages

As explain the article that some of them concepts under of the modern utilitarianism state that people are free to do as the individuals please unless that those actions produces a negative effect other persons

Read More

Ayer's Argumentative Analysis

683 Words | 3 Pages

At the beginning of the twentieth century, the dominant style of moral philosophy was overthrown by European influences. G.E. Moore, a British philosopher, challenged the idea that goodness was a measurable quality. This critique of American naturalistic ethics was followed by A.J. Ayer, a member of the Vienna Circle, who argued that the philosophy of morals was a “pseudo-concept” that could not be argued for or against. Charles L. Stevenson brought Ayer’s thinking to America where he incorporated the ideas of logical positivism into the discussion of ethics.

Read More

The Divine Command Theory

797 Words | 4 Pages

In terms of the second part God commands these actions because they are right, this statement places morality separate from God, there is an independent standard of moral right and wrong that undermine the omnipotence and Omni benevolence of God (Leibniz, 1951). This point is also a response to the objection of the divine command theory, in making morality and God independent we ignore the greatness of God, who as the creator has the right to command and we are obligated to obey His commands (Rachels, 1969). Some other critiques of the divine command theory and its failure that have been brought up includes the pluralism objection which describes the matter of the number of religions practised around the world and the differing understandings and the possible misunderstandings that could arise due to conflicting views (Wierenga, 2009). Some moral theists argue that without religion there is no basis for morality, without God then everything including the unsavoury actions mentioned previously is

Read More

Hutcheson's Moral Sense

1093 Words | 5 Pages

The point is that moral approvals and disapprovals done by our moral sense are specific in nature and only operate when there is an action that can be appropriately judged of by our moral sense. Reasoning and information can change the evaluation of the moral sense, but no amount of reasoning can or does precede the moral sense in regard to its approval of what is for the public good. The moral sense approves of the good for others. This concern for others by the moral sense is what is natural to humankind, Hutcheson contended. Reason gives content to the moral sense, informing it of what is good for others and the public good

Read More

Essay On Ethics And Religion

929 Words | 4 Pages

Once morality requires justification, it stops being moral and becomes a

Read More

More about Absolutist Theory Of Morality

Related Topics

Open Document